jim hoffman

Don't got time to bleed! OK, I am paraphrasing, but I found Gage's answer rather pathetic in this interview for the upcoming issue of Skeptical Inquirer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=UhYn1Kdi78c

I've been too lazy to do anything about the many requests to find a new home for my 47-minute video "World Trade Center Not a Demolition," which had been pulled by Google a couple of years ago. Mike Williams of 911myths.com contacted me and generously offered to convert and host the video, so...

I don't know if the rest of you know but if you do and Mackey did indeed debunk Hoffman post the link so I can read it. As we all know, Mackey wrote a 300 page critique on Griffin's chapter on the NIST report. http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/Mackey_drg_nist_review_2_1.pdf Hoffman, however...

Thermitic Pyrotechnics in the WTC Made Simple Three Points of Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe that Anyone Can Understand by Jim Hoffman Version 0.7, April 18, 2009 Introduction The scientific paper Active Thermitic Material...

I have been working through the text of Jim Hoffman’s slide presention . (http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/towers/text/index.html ) I am filling in a lot of information that he has wrong, left out or has distorted as I am dealing with a truther who is pretty convinced that he has presented the...

I have been posting on Diane's blog for a few days now, and she has had several e-mail exchanges and phone calls with Jim Hoffman in the past. I asked, if she could ask Hoffman to appear on Hardfire. Here is the reply: "I’ve written to Jim Hoffman, and he has replied telling me that he would...

That was originally proposed in, you guessed it, the Journal of 9-11 Studies. Jim Hoffman demolishes the elephant plane paper that made up 1/4 of the first issue's "scholarly" content. Of course, the folks over at the Journal of Debunking 9-11 Studies took that ridiculous paper out ages ago.