Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.
I don't know if anyone has mentioned this at any point in time given the fact that I've only been on here a couple of months but there is something I just thought of. Its said, by the TM, that the towers fell at free fall speed. The spped of course as we all know is 9.2 seconds. That is...
How many times have we heard 9/11 CT'ers say this? We don't need the pesky facts! Common sense tells us it was a CD, there was no plane, it wasn't Islamic Terrorists, it was a new pearl harbor, fill in the blank ...
I just posted this OpEd piece from the L.A. Times over in the Science Section...
Dylan Avery attempts to prove...something...in his analysis of a video, and inadvertently ends up disproving "freefall speed". Discovered by XXX:
The video: http://www.loosechange911.com/download/south_tower_ground_NBC.divx
So, by Do-Over's estimation, the first debris hit the ground some...
The 9/11 CTers are always going on about how the WTC collapsed "faster than freefall". Have any of them ever proven this? That is, told us the speed of a object free-falling through the air, and then told us the precise speed of fall of the WTC?
I don't believe in the controlled demolition theory, but I am constantly puzzled by the skeptics denial that the towers fell essentially in freefall. It appears to be another case of just refuting truthers arguments simply because they are truthers.
NIST themselves admit this in Section 6.14.4...
I remember reading a few links about how CTers completely disagree with the freefall "collapse" of the Twin Towers, but I can't seem to find it around here.
Anyone know which links I am talking about?
Skunkrider,
Please provide a clear definition by what you mean by the phrase, "collapsed partly in free fall speed" and provide substantiating evidence to support your definition and conclusions.
I never saw such an idiotic freefall calculation. Read myname is from his very first post and watch how his detractors get banned. Now we know where the woowoos get it :D
http://www.proxygem.com/cgi-bin/nph-proxy.cgi/010110A/http/z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php=3fshowtopic=3d2346
A co-worker seems to have bought into the MIHOP scenarios, and he had a new take on the "OMGzors the buildings fell faster than free-fall" issue.
Put simply, he said that the wave of destruction travels downwards faster than free-fall, and that this is the controlled demolition being triggered...
From "What we saw"
WTC7 on the left.
A little later, the "spire"
Any help from physicists gratefully received.
The intermediate shots and timings are available at
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5370762387415552903
Apologies if you've seen all this stuff before .. it's...
I am no expert in conspiracy theories, neither am I an engineer or a demolitions expert. It seems to me, though, that the folks claiming that the buildings were brought down by "controlled demolition" are missing something.
Aren't demolition charges rather noisy when they detonate?
There...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.