frank greening

Just posting this here so that people interested can Download Franks Latest study. http://www.scientificmethod911.org/new_listings.html Comments welcome, from those who know what this means.

Posted yesterday by Metamars on The 9/11 Forum; apparently Kevin Barrett is interviewing Frank Greening this morning. http://the911forum.freeforums.org/dr-g-former-darling-of-jref-anti-9-11-truth-debunkers-t200.html Yes, folks, you heard it here first: Frank Greening is the only honest...

This makes for some entertaining reading. The original exchange begins here. Legge's attack on Greening is here. Is this a fair assessment of Greening's error? I don't pretend to know who's right in this discussion, but it got a certain Mormon to use some pretty colorful language.

What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York I have read subject article by Bazant, Le, Greening and Benson (BLGB below) in Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 134 (2008), with great interest and would like to make the following observations: There is no need to...

Dr. Greening has submitted a withering critique of the new WTC7 draft reports to NIST as public comment. If this is the best NIST can do after 7 years, they should start considering alternative hypotheses.

I've been cleaning up the odds and ends for v2.1 of my whitepaper, and tried to access www.nistreview.org. Got a placeholder. Is this site gone? It had some real nonsense from Dr. Jones, but it also had some thoughtful content from Dr. Greening, Eric Douglas, and others on it. Is this...

I have been looking at the recent article by Kurt King entitled “WTC Dust Cloud Energetics and Implications”, published in Volume 1 of the 9/11 Scholars Review at: http://www.911scholarsreview.org/current.html I have started an e-mail exchange about this article with Mr. King and I thought...

Some truther came up with this regarding Bazant et al.'s paper "Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers: What did and did not cause it" This must be just another lie from the moronic America-haters.

Anyone else read this yet? http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/00%20WTC%20Collapse%20-%20What%20Did%20%26%20Did%20Not%20Cause%20It%20-%205-2007.pdf

Apologies if this has already been addressed, but I saw today that Scholars for 9/11 Truth are organizing a "Let's Settle Our Differences" get-together in Madison, WI in August. See announcement at link - I don't know when it was posted. http://911scholars.org/ What caught my eye was this...

I just thought this deserved a thread of its own. Thanks to Horace Wheeljack and AW Smith for the links to it. http://checktheevidence.com/audio/911/Frank%20Greening%20-%20WTC%20-%20Dynamic%20Duo%20-%20Jim%20Fetzer%2004%20Apr%202007.mp3 I've got to admit, despite Fetzer's pressing and...

Having antagonized far too many people here with my political views, I think it's time to get back to conspiracy theories. Here is an e-mail exchange between Dr. Frank Greening and Steven Jones: Dear Dr. Jones, I have recently read the latest version of your paper "Why Indeed Did the WTC...

Ace Baker's 'Hunt the Rubble' game has drawn fire from rationalists outraged at another sneering know-nothing's mockery of the victims of the jihadist attacks of 9/11/01. Baker, who posts here as Truthseeker1234, paraded his scientific expertise on a Conspiracy Smasher thread, "Dumb Doesn't Even...

Frank Greening is divorced from reality. He imagines a scenario that is easily, thoroughly refuted by the the video evidence. Greening says: Yo, Frank. Look at this. Your "Stage 2" begins before "Stage 1".

Consider Gordon Ross' paper: http://worldtradecentertruth.com/Journal_5_PTransferRoss.pdf (remove space after h) Frank Greening's attempted criticism: http://worldtradecentertruth.com/Article_2_Greening.pdf (remove space after h) and Ross' reply to Greening...