flight 175

Hello. For my first post, void of links, a lesson for victims of Pilots for 9/11 Truth's video "9/11: Identify," specifically the portion on YouTube with ID# PhqZQqQdjyk titled "Murray Street Engine." You'll see my comments there. I'm CTV911. I plan to participate in a thread created here some...

The "Nose in Nose out" is the strongest evidence that Flight 175 was NOT a CGI plane No planers claim that the "nose out" shot is the "smoking gun" that flight 175 was a CGI plane. But in fact it's the single strongest evidence that it was real. Since the nose-out was captured by every single...

I'm sure it's here somewhere, but can someone steer me to the debunk of this rubbish-

Lots of graphs and mathy stuff. I can't comment on the strengths nor weaknesses of the paper, but so far I find Monaghan poses some interesting hypotheses. I look forward to reading the competing commentary, and as usual, with hope that discourse might be civil and directed at the methods and...

Why does Balsamo make up fake Vg diagrams? What is a Vg diagram and how does it relate to Deets? Who cares ... Balsamo, the leader of p4t delusions, uses "experts" to increase DVD sales, spread the same old moronic delusions and mislead people with his paranoid anti-intellectual...

I think that these photos show a plane. Anyone else? http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Image:Flight_175_Adair.jpg http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Image:Flight_175_Bursuker.jpg http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Image:Flight_175_Luke_Cremin.jpg...

Ryan, In your paper "On Debunking 911 Debunking" you make the statement that one of the reasons the damage to the South Tower core was greater was that the aircraft was only pitched down 6 degrees at impact vs. the 10 degree downward pitch angle of the North Tower aircraft at impact, and that...

The Challenge: What one piece of evidence(even though the evidence has all been seized & one needs to concentrate on catching them in lies/evasiveness in their answers) would convince you the WTC attack was genuine. THE REPLY: The screenshots from the Bureau Of Transportation Statistics Web...

Wondering if some of our aviation gurus can help. What was the fuel load carried by the hijacked jets on 9/11? Various sources give anywhere from 9,000 to 11,000 gals. Boeing specs list 767-200ER has having max fuel load of 23,980 gal (90,770l) which I take as being used only for long...

Greetings! Looking for picture of aircraft debris at WTC. Been fighting some truther loons who insist that all the aircraft debris, specifically jet engines, were all "planted". Picture I'm looking for is piece of landing gear inbedded in trunk of car on street. Try explaining that to...

Does anyone here have any ideas on how amateur pilots were able to maintain control of the planes at the speeds claimed let alone not have the planes fall apart in mid-flight? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2upl977dsY Added: September 21, 2007 From: pumpitout Here is a clip confirming what...

Last night I viewed, for the third or fourth time, the Discovery-Times documentary "Flight 175: As the World Watched." I can't begin to describe how intensely moving I found the experience. It's one of the main reasons I got into the debunking business. If you haven't already seen this...

--- Greetings Everyone! Max Photon here. Here is an article I wrote. MAX-MIHOP Says: The Aluminum Components of Flights 11 and 175 Were Used as Aluminum Powder for Phreato-Thermatic Explosions I welcome your comments and criticism. Regards, Maxwell C. Photon Department of Lighting ---

http://www.acebaker.com/9-11/PinocchioStudy/Chopper5Velocity.html Breach of Rule 6 removed. Several of your other posts have just been deleted since they were nothing but spamming this Forum with your own material.

175 did NOT hit the South tower. A remote controlled flight from Offutt AFB did. 1. Raytheon, in Aug 2001, flew a passenger jet, take off – flight around – landing. (Der Spiegel). 2. Raytheon deal in small executive jets, there is no reason for them to fly large passenger planes by remote...

I was watching the 9/11 Commision video presentation (aired on C-SPAN) that tracks the flight paths of the four planes, and I noticed that it portrays UA 175's flight over Staten Island as involving some very jerky manouvers. Around 9:01:35, the plane is above the Westerleigh neighborhood of...

I recently came across a very useful PDF document Here It's a big one - over 120 pages. Not sure on its specific origins, but it's some sort of staff report from Aug 2004 regarding the four flights on 9/11. It has a detailed timeline for each flight, amongst other things. Very useful...

Check this thread... http://forum.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=messageboard.viewThread&groupID=100649623&page=0&EntryID=30249957&CategoryID=0&get=1&adTopicId=16&lastpagesent=1&Mytoken=C5526F8A-8B8D-43DA-9E3614146A4DE00D48688277

Check out this video: http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=4631948562959650929 It shows two camera views that are supposedly from the same spot and yet show different flight paths. Um, except that they aren't in the same spot. A screen shot from the end of the video: I don't even need...

IfxjBfQZ9qU Actually a (relatively*) valiant attempt at analysing some footage. Unfortunately for him, and inevitably, it has obvious fatal flaws. He predicts where the plane should be at the start of the footage by using a rate of descent (and speed) extrapolated from the last ~0.5 seconds...

Can someone clarify for me what happened to the “black boxes” from flights 11 and 175? Didn’t two FDNY firefighters say they found the black boxes but were supposedly told to hush up about it by the FBI? Was their story at all credible? Thanks in advance.

I've done some preliminary investigoogling but I can't seem to find a reference to an estimate of how fast the planes that hit the two WTC towers were travelling. Can anyone provide a reference? Thanks. It's the last bit of info I need to refute a troofer in a letter to my local paper.

someone posted this at 911 blogger, i hadnt heard this before. Lets see it debunked " Popular Mechanics, while mentioning that an engine from the South Tower airliner landed in the street, neglected to show an engine photo, engine street location, and engine positive identification. Just by...

Arghhhhh I'm debating elsewhere and could really do with a photo/diagram of the undersides of a Boeing 767-22 (WTC2) that I'm sure I saw over here. Can't find it now. I've viewed about a jillion poxy plane photos at airliners.net, but they're mostly unclear as to the undersides of the plane...

The 9/11 commission's claim that NORAD didn't know about flight 175 until after it crashed into the WTC is contradicted by NORAD's first statement, by Captain Michael Jellinek, a Canadian who on 9/11 was overseeing NORAD's headquarters in Colorado, and by Laura Brown of the FAA.