debunking 911

  1. L

    The best site for 911 research

    is here, or so I was informed by JREFers. Some gave me this youtube clip sometime ago. I have never known quite what to make of it, as there seems to be a very good community of anti-truther opponents here, I can depend on you to give me the right debunking and that is exactly what I want...
  2. T

    Debunking the supposed motivations and benefits of the Inside Job

    Truthers argue that the many forces that were involved in the 9-11 inside job, did it for various reasons, and achieved various results. Some of these reasons include: -to clamp down on freedom in the USA -to install martial law in the USA -to insure Neo-Conservative rule in the USA for...
  3. BenBurch

    Ought there be a "Slaughter Rule" in debunking?

    You know in chicago-style slow-pitch softball, when one team is 15 runs ahead of the other, the game is over. And our present situation with the 911 CTers is; It's the bottom of the first inning. Gravy, our pitcher, struck out the first three Truther batters, and now we have been getting home...
  4. T

    Questions concerning peer review on the Journal of Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories

    On an earlier thread, concerning whether or not Mark Roberts' work on 911 was peer reviewed or not, I was surprised to hear from both him and Ryan Mackey, that although their respective papers appear on the Journal of Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories, that they did not actually submit them to...
  5. GregoryUrich

    Debunking "On Debunking 9/11 Debunking"

    While I respect R. Mackey's knowledge of the NIST reports, I must say that after reading the first section of "On Debunking 9/11 Debunking" that I am dissappointed. My comments are available here. R. Mackey, please let me know if you feel this is not "fair use".

Back
Top Bottom