• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories
  • You may need to edit your signatures.

    When we moved to Xenfora some of the signature options didn't come over. In the old software signatures were limited by a character limit, on Xenfora there are more options and there is a character number and number of lines limit. I've set maximum number of lines to 4 and unlimited characters.

Who will win next weeks presidential debate?

Who will win next week's presidential debate?


  • Total voters
    63
  • Poll closed .
It's been my personal policy since before the Orange Weakling. While I can't stop anyone else from doing, I have mentioned why I think it's a bad idea.
 
Trust me, we all know what you mean.

Your statement doesn't even make sense. Why would yo ubeleive someone who just tells you what they are? We're discussing an event where people purposefully try to spin events in their own favor. And you say we should take people at their word? Irrespective of everything else they present?

You have no concept of things like "context".

Some of us have repeatedly been directed to believe whatever people say they are, regardless of the evidence in front of our eyes... because if we don't then we're evil people.

Thus my snarky commentary.
 
Which is more important about a person, their mind or their fleshy envelope? Going off your eyes alone is how people in wheelchairs are constantly assumed to be as mindless as they are motionless.
 
Which is more important about a person, their mind or their fleshy envelope? Going off your eyes alone is how people in wheelchairs are constantly assumed to be as mindless as they are motionless.

Advanced age is not analogous to paraplegia in this context. And people do not go off their eyes alone, when taking advanced age as a proxy indicator of possible mental decline.
 
Which is more important about a person, their mind or their fleshy envelope? Going off your eyes alone is how people in wheelchairs are constantly assumed to be as mindless as they are motionless.

No one thought Stephen Hawking was derelict even when he only spoke through a computer voice.
HIs mind was fine and he was famous for it .
Bidens legs are ok...for his age. It is his brain that is filling with destructive holes..
Stop with all the cope. These are the arguments of children.
 
Which is more important about a person, their mind or their fleshy envelope? Going off your eyes alone is how people in wheelchairs are constantly assumed to be as mindless as they are motionless.

Biden's problem isn't that he can't walk. It's his inability to call Trump lies on the spot.
Although his walking ability declined quickly. Remember when he occasionally stumbled when leaving a plane ? See the post debate celebration. His wife is helping him to step down 2 small steps on the stage. He barely makes it. He will use the wheelchair sooner or later.
 
Watching the sudden flip from denial & excusery to admitting it, during the "debate" and immediately afterward, was psychologically fascinating... but watching the denial & excusery come creeping back a few days later is even more psychologically fascinating.
 
Biden's problem isn't that he can't walk. It's his inability to call Trump lies on the spot.
Although his walking ability declined quickly. Remember when he occasionally stumbled when leaving a plane ? See the post debate celebration. His wife is helping him to step down 2 small steps on the stage. He barely makes it. He will use the wheelchair sooner or later.

FDR was the most consequential president of the 20th Century from a wheel chair.
 
FDR was the most consequential president of the 20th Century from a wheel chair.

Yeah, but his wheelchair wasn't due to progressive physical and mental decline arising from advanced age.

That said, if Biden does win a second term, he could very well become the most consequential president of the 21st century, from a wheelchair.
 
FDR was the most consequential president of the 20th Century from a wheel chair.

Do you think wheel chairs affect brain function?
Do you know very stupid persons who think that it does?

Have you seen the governor of Texas lately?
 
Watching the sudden flip from denial & excusery to admitting it, during the "debate" and immediately afterward, was psychologically fascinating... but watching the denial & excusery come creeping back a few days later is even more psychologically fascinating.

We live in an age of media, social media and societal Alzheimers.

We are racing from one outrage to another.
 
Watching the sudden flip from denial & excusery to admitting it, during the "debate" and immediately afterward, was psychologically fascinating... but watching the denial & excusery come creeping back a few days later is even more psychologically fascinating.

The whole affair is going to be memory-holed over the next month or two.
 

Back
Top Bottom