• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories
  • You may need to edit your signatures.

    When we moved to Xenfora some of the signature options didn't come over. In the old software signatures were limited by a character limit, on Xenfora there are more options and there is a character number and number of lines limit. I've set maximum number of lines to 4 and unlimited characters.

UK Rape Gangs

Jack_by_the Hedge said (see above)


It's very silly to talk about this demographic as though it has just arrived.


<snip>





Trying to make out the rape gangs - a tiny criminal minority - is due to being primitive peasants is pure dog whistle racism by Badenoch as she thinks that is what appeals to people.


Let's quit the misinformation and
look unflinchingly at the issue.
Most of us did - years ago.
 
Yet strangely, to combat the horrible evils of Pakistani child rapists the golden boy of the UK alt right is Andrew Tate, a convicted child rapist and human traffiker.
 
Whereas you're trying to make out that rape gang behaviour is due to something other than rural poverty, presumably something which couldn't be mistaken for racism I suppose.
Is it OK to call out the Catholics and the Anglicans who flock to the priesthood for nefarious reasons? Are those clearly identifiable sectors 'racist' to call out? Does it taint all Catholics and Anglicans or does it just provide a useful framework for future safeguarding?
 
I'm not sure what your point is. Would it be useful to identify people who join the priesthood for nefarious reasons? Sure. Do you think it's a useful step towards that to note they're clearly identifiable as members of their religions? Umm, no, that's not very helpful.
 
Campaigner Maggie Oliver has sent Labour's Yvette Cooper a 'letter before action' demanding immediate implementation of Alexis Jay's 27-point recommendations.. Cooper in the interim has announced a rapid three-month audit of the situation and local investigations, pledging to reopen old cases, if necessary.

 
"The use of inflammatory language over grooming gangs risks vilifying entire communities and could lead to atrocities such as the mosque massacre in New Zealand that killed more than 50 people, the health secretary has warned."


So now you know why you are not allowed to mention the elephant in the room...or at least, that is Streeting's pathetic rationale for covering up the grooming gangs scandal..
:rolleyes:
And yet people, generally noisy, ignorant idiots and Mushies, are mentioning the matter......
 
On the other side of the coin - according to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, imams from countries that practise Sharia Law say that women should stay out of sight and should cover themselves up otherwise the expectation is that men will behave like animals.

Have you a less biased source for that assertion?
 
Blaming women when men can't control themselves is not something only Moslems do.
No it's a popular stance in the far-right conservative demographic that idolises cretins like Mush and the Tates too.
As Poxy said:
If the definition of rape is stretched so far to include women who have not given consent, then I am absolutely a serial rapist.
 
Source or actual argument?
:rolleyes:
You could go and look at the demolitions of her "arguments" and the exposures of the numerous lies in her "autobiography".
Start with people like Kiran Grewal, Nathan Lean, Ibrahim Hooper, Adam Yaghi, Rula Jebreal and others.
 
Perhaps you should stop telling me what I should do? And maybe study other sources too, not only those that fit your picture of the world.
:rolleyes:
This is truly hilarious. I've visited about sixty countries in my life, lived in eight, met and talked to people from a range of nations, beliefs, cultures and situations. But you refuse to enter a mosque because you've lapped up lies.
 

She is no feminist, just a fanatical convert with a huge axe to grind.
Pity, if she had focused more on doing good than on looking out for no.1, she might have been doing actual good in the world instead of promoting hate and violence against all Muslims.
And the money. Don't forget the money. She grabbed onto the Islamophobic gravy train after 11SEP with both hands.
 
It would have been difficult for them to get much here earlier, certainly...


Oh, and what do you by mean 'here', exactly? Your displayed location is not in the UK.
Oddly, and a bit OT, the last Pakistani I spoke to here in Ireland (I think) runs a chip shop and had to deal with a man bleeding on his floor recently while wanting to be arrested.
The world is sometime a strange place.
 
Campaigner Maggie Oliver has sent Labour's Yvette Cooper a 'letter before action' demanding immediate implementation of Alexis Jay's 27-point recommendations.. Cooper in the interim has announced a rapid three-month audit of the situation and local investigations, pledging to reopen old cases, if necessary.

It would have been nice if she'd done the same to Suella Braverman, Grant Shapps, James Cleverly and their respective Prime Ministers.......
 
Former Tory MP Andrew Bridgen claims that he knows people flying kids into the UK for abuse. He gave names to the government, but no action was taken.
They use small, unsecured airports apparently, he informed MI5 and the National Crime Agency, but nothing happened.
The kids are used in sex trade for 3 years, then organ harvested.
 
Former Tory MP Andrew Bridgen claims that he knows people flying kids into the UK for abuse. He gave names to the government, but no action was taken.
They use small, unsecured airports apparently, he informed MI5 and the National Crime Agency, but nothing happened.
The kids are used in sex trade for 3 years, then organ harvested.
Sounds like conspiratorial nonsense. Same dude thinks covid vaccines are akin to the holocaust, so not a lot of credibility there I'm afraid.
 
Embarrassingly for the UK Conservatives, and those Useful Idiots who've jumped on the Mushie bandwagon, the former chair of the child abuse inquiry has described the Conservative response to the recommendations from her inquiry as "awful".

Speaking to the Commons home affairs committee, [Prof Alexis] Jay said the written response to the 20 recommendations – which followed a seven-year inquiry – had been “inconsequential, insubstantial, committed to nothing”.

As PA Media reports, Jay told MPs that while the initial response from home secretary Grant Shapps to the report when first published in October 2022 left her feeling “much encouraged”, that had been “the high point” of the experience with the Conservative government on the issue.

The government’s written response in May 2023 to the report under the next home secretary Suella Braverman was “awful”, Jay said. She said:

It was awful. I cannot tell you how it felt to constantly read the response, when we got the final printed version of the government’s response.

It was inconsequential, insubstantial, committed to nothing. And the wording that was used very often amongst the 20 recommendations was ‘we accept the need for’ whatever it was, but made no specific commitment to delivering it or any timescale whatsoever at that stage.

The reaction of all of us, but mostly victims and survivors, was such huge disappointment and anger at what they had pinned a great deal of hope and anticipation on, that the recommendations we made would be delivered.
Not good news for the idiots bashing Starmer.
 
30p Lee says of the Scottish rape gang just convicted

Lee Anderson MP

@LeeAndersonMP_

I said import the third world then get third world behaviour.

Not sure whats so difficult to understand. Let me spell it out for you. Disproportionately compared to any other demographic Pakistani rape gangs are responsible and outnumber any group for the systematic rape of young, vulnerable British white girls.


Also the eneral consensus among the Gammons and Reform supporters is their sentence is an example of Starmer's Two Tier justice.

Pakistani rape gangs get light sentences or don't go to trial at all.
 
:rolleyes:
This is truly hilarious. I've visited about sixty countries in my life, lived in eight, met and talked to people from a range of nations, beliefs, cultures and situations. But you refuse to enter a mosque because you've lapped up lies.
(1) What does it have to do with the topic?
(2) What makes you think I don't have enough experience in my life?
(3) Would it be possible to talk about the subject without making any ad hominem statements?
 
(1) What does it have to do with the topic?
(2) What makes you think I don't have enough experience in my life?
(3) Would it be possible to talk about the subject without making any ad hominem statements?
:rolleyes:
Travel and experience with other cultures tends to broaden one's mind. You should give it a try. Rather than being too scared of new things to even enter a mosque.

And you should learn what 'argumentum ad hominem' actually means before using the term.
 
:rolleyes:
Travel and experience with other cultures tends to broaden one's mind. You should give it a try. Rather than being too scared of new things to even enter a mosque.

And you should learn what 'argumentum ad hominem' actually means before using the term.

Oh, two new pieces of advice in one short message! Wonderful. Keep going! :)
 
Back
Top Bottom