• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories

U.S. Goverment Healthcare Fraud

Then show us the evidence and reasoning! If you want it to be critically examined, you have to allow us to examine it.
 
So far, all we know is:
  1. You haven't specified which laws have been broken or offences committed.
  2. You haven't shown evidence of a crime that pertains to those laws.
  3. You don't appear to have shown any evidence to a lawyer and sought their opinion.
  4. You continue to insist there was a crime you claim happened.
  5. Your former employer and government legal organisations apparently said there is nothing to action.
  6. You are here to discuss your claims, still without completing the above steps.
  7. You keep saying you will produce all the evidence...eventually...but haven't yet.
Sounds like you are developing a script or novel, not seeking justice. Unless you want to address any of the above points?
 
Renaissance said:
@Norman Alexander I am here to present evidence and reasoning and to have that evidence and reasoning critically and honestly examined. I am perfectly content with the null hypothesis being that what I say has not occurred. I am of the belief that, on most line items, I can move most of those who honestly engage past the 95% mark.

Every single person who has looked at a substantial portion of my evidence has agreed with me 100%, that what I say has definitely occurred.

Such people are not many in number, and this is also a preoccupation of mine that I almost never tire of talking about.

It is largely a symptom of my ptsd and my tendency to perseverate also plays a small role. I am autistic.
Click to expand...
HAVE YOU TAKEN YOUR EVIDENCE TO A LAWYER? They are the FIRST people to advise you in anything legal.
 
Renaissance said:
@theprestige that’s not correct my friend. As you will see, the crimes of Wells Fargo were initially an attempt to cover up the privacy violation. The crimes that involve the government are for the purposes of covering up Wells Fargo’s crimes.

A cover up of someone’s crimes makes no sense unless that person or corporation committed crimes. Further, the severity of the crimes is also a factor.

Had I been victimized with a single misdemeanor, it would really beg the question as to why would the government even bother with a cover-up. That is why I must first establish the crimes first.
Click to expand...
We can easily stipulate the victimization, if you can demonstrate the cover up.

Cut to the chase.
 
Renaissance said:
@junkshop I want it critically examined, which is the process of debunking anything. There is no such thing as a conspiracy theorist who does not wish for others to see the truth of his claims. This is no matter if they are really true or just perceived as true. I am no different.

The term conspiracy theory, applied to my claims, is the characterization of others. I defer to them, even as I personally disagree.

To me, I make a claim that I have been subjected to crimes and that some of those crimes are sponsored by the U.S. government, with the aim being to cover-up crimes committed against me by a wall street bank.

If I say that crimes have occurred, is that a conspiracy? The answer seems to be an obvious no, but I again defer. If people want to call it a conspiracy theory, I’m happy to speak with them on their terms.
Click to expand...
OK, now support your claim with evidence.

Show us the crime. Show us the cover-up. Show us that the alleged cover-up was also a crime.
 
Well, any way the eventual evidence points, you seem like an affable person to talk to, and I and I'm sure others here gladly welcome you. This forum enjoys forthrightness though. My advice is, avoid beating around the bush if you value your existing benefit of the doubt.
 
@theprestige I have lived and breathed this fight for over 5 years. It has consumed nearly every useable hour that I have available for that entire time. I know my case better than you do. I know how to prove it. I am the prosecutor. You are the jury. It is my case to make. Just trust me. With that said, the frameworks you have laid out have thus far been very useful. From here, however, I need to take the lead.

@theprestige, @junkshop, @arthwollipot, @Lithrael you are all going to have to give me time. I am disabled with a lot on my plate. Putting this together in a succinct way is hard as well. Just stay tuned. I will have you some stuff.

@Lithrael I am a gentleman almost always.
 
Renaissance said:
@Norman Alexander I am here to present evidence and reasoning and to have that evidence and reasoning critically and honestly examined. I am perfectly content with the null hypothesis being that what I say has not occurred. I am of the belief that, on most line items, I can move most of those who honestly engage past the 95% mark.

Every single person who has looked at a substantial portion of my evidence has agreed with me 100%, that what I say has definitely occurred.

Such people are not many in number, and this is also a preoccupation of mine that I almost never tire of talking about.

It is largely a symptom of my ptsd and my tendency to perseverate also plays a small role. I am autistic.
Click to expand...
So you have not presented this "evidence" to a lawyer. Which suggests to me you really don't think you have any case at all.
 
Renaissance said:
@theprestige I have lived and breathed this fight for over 5 years. It has consumed nearly every useable hour that I have available for that entire time. I know my case better than you do. I know how to prove it. I am the prosecutor. You are the jury. It is my case to make. Just trust me. With that said, the frameworks you have laid out have thus far been very useful. From here, however, I need to take the lead.

@theprestige, @junkshop, @arthwollipot, @Lithrael you are all going to have to give me time. I am disabled with a lot on my plate. Putting this together in a succinct way is hard as well. Just stay tuned. I will have you some stuff.

@Lithrael I am a gentleman almost always.
Click to expand...
You could help yourself and your case a great deal more by not pissing about here on this forum asking for our help. You would do MUCH BETTER by taking your case to a lawyer. There's plenty of them about who will take on worthy cases pro bono (for free).
 
I'm kind of stuck on the thread title, where's the health care fraud exactly? Also, if there really is a series of crimes, find a lawyer who will take your case for a cut of whatever civil settlement you can get. But to be honest, I'm not seeing an actual crime. Looking someone up on facebook is intrusive, not sure it's a crime. If its a solid case, you should find one that will take it on contingency.

Regarding WF's HR, yes they work for Wells Fargo but they're primary goal is not getting sued. If they thought you were in the right, they'd protect Wells Fargo by punishing you're supervisor and coworker not by covering it up. Why would they be more loyal to your supervisor than to Wells Fargo?
 
Renaissance said:
1. A senior manager at Wells Fargo, who had problems with me, put my former coworker, named Jenny, up to “inquiring about my past” behind my back.
...
4. As *part* of my evidence, I give the snippets from the chat where Courtney admits it to me that Jenny inquired about my past.
Click to expand...
Do you have evidence that the manager instructed the former coworker to investigate you, or do you only have those messages in which they appear to accept it happened?
 
Rena, the crew here us giving you good advice. If you really have a solid case of something a good lawyer would help you.

Postíng on public forums the details of the case or getting advice from the non-lawyer peanut gallery is the WORST thing to do your possible case. Any lawyer will tell you that. But, as you have made the documents you created public access here, it's a bit late.

If that good lawyer sees all your paperwork, studies it and then tells you have nothing believe him. He won't risk his practice on a bad case.
He isn't part of the conspiracy or somehow sold to WF or the DOJ.
Sharks love fat juicy prey. Is that really what you offer?

Of all you can do it's apparent that being clear and concise isn't part of your skill set. It should be. One clear page could possibly sumarise at least 30 pages of your documents. Maybe work on that.
 
Yeah you'll be wasting your time if your intention is to build up history or goodwill before you start laying out your actual case. This forum wants facts to look at, 'stuff in general' and prologues to your story will get you a page or two of engagement and then it will die. We'll ask you for the facts but we mostly won't beg.
 
@Jack by the hedge if you read that chat, in context, Courtney does not “accept” that it happened, she tells me what *did* happen, without me asking or saying anything about someone “inquiring about my past”. And yes, this senior manager had been using Jenny to manage the situation with me for some time before this. He is the obvious source of this. I don’t want to spend much time on the privacy violation, as the eventual crimes that unfold make it obvious that Wells Fargo has a massive liability related to this.
 
Renaissance said:
@Jack by the hedge if you read that chat, in context, Courtney does not “accept” that it happened, she tells me what *did* happen, without me asking ...
Click to expand...
But you haven't given us the context. That chat was clearly not your first conversation on the topic, and we can't guess what went before if you don't tell us. You told us the manager instructed the coworker to investigate you. I asked if you had evidence that happened. It now appears you don't, but rather you decided it was "obvious".
 
@ahhell being loyal to my supervisor is being loyal to Wells Fargo. His actions are legally the actions of the bank. If they fire him, that is an acknowledgement of wrongdoing. It signals to the world that what I say is true, cause they fired him over it. It creates a liability for them and strengthens my case. You have got to realize that you are dealing with a company that fires people for reporting crimes to its ethics line. These people aren’t into creating liabilities for themselves. They are into evading them through crime, as you will see. They are above the law. They know that and they have always known that. I had to learn the hard way.

Healthcare fraud, in my case, involves two things- 1) the creation of fraudulent healthcare records; and 2) attempting to illegally obtain private healthcare information through fraud.
 
If you can't explain concisely what evidence you have that your manager prevailed on your colleage to investigate you then okay, I'll drop it. But please be assured I'm not going to watch your YouTube video or your even longer YouTube video to see if I can glean the information you can't simply tell us here.
 
Renaissance said:
@Gulliver Foyle I’m not going to tolerate your demeaning, bigoted remarks. You will be ignored going forward. Get a life and learn some manners.
Click to expand...
Awww pity about you. But a bit of advice, when trying to fathom others, describing your reflection in a mirror isn't the way to go about it.

The best thing you can do is get the advice of a mental health professional over your rampant paranoia.
 
Yeah, HIPAA can be deeply misunderstood and/but 'go have a poke round somebody's socials and see what you can turn up' is basically never illegal afaik. There's a guy called Money Bug 9423 on Reddit who's as mad about this as you are. Y'all should hang out.

For example, the
FCRA does not apply to an employer that conducts background checks for itself. FCRA only applies if an
employer uses a outside company to check someone's socials. The only illegal part would be discovering and using protected-class information in a discriminatory way.

You'd have a case if, say, you could make the argument that they found out on your facebook that you were black, and fired you because they don't like black people. This is the reason a lot of companies use a third party to conduct social media research; the third party leaves out any protected class info, so the employer can't accuse them of 'really' firing them over that.

After you make the concise version of your complaint, maybe reach out to this person: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1780327

as they've written a wonderfully annoyed discussion paper about these practices.
 
Last edited:
Gulliver Foyle said:
My guess is Renaissance has already been to a lawyer and got told they've no case.
Click to expand...
that's not necessarily true either. years ago i a family member of mine was involved in a serious health incident that, i felt fairly obviously, was handled negligently by his doctor and caused some very serious and life long health complications, and cost us thousands of dollars on top of it. i went to several lawyers, all of which told me it's not that there's not a case, it's that winning it wasn't guaranteed and the millions in cost they'd have to pay up front to bring in medical experts to testify was too much of a risk. multiple firms told me they basically didn't take any cases unless someone had died. i'd have to produce tens of thousands in fees for them to even consider it and it would take years to litigate. i'm still mad that this doctor basically maimed and almost killed my family member and got away with it no consequences.

anyway, i don't know the details of this guy's beef here in this thread and i'm not really qualified to even speak towards it if i did. but i do know that just get a lawywer and sue is way more difficult and complicated than getting a lawyer and suing, and if you have a case and could win even that's often not enough.
 
and i suggest there’s a strong possibility that getting a lawyer not a realistic option irrespective of the facts of the case
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom