• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories

U.S. Goverment Healthcare Fraud

Renaissance

New Blood
R
Joined
Dec 9, 2024
Messages
23
Location
Linville
I have a conspiracy theory that I would like debunked. It involves me. My claim is that the U.S. Government has engaged in crimes to cover up the crimes of a Wall Street bank against me.

One primary tactic is overseeing the creation of fraudulent medical records that make deliberately fraudulent claims that my belief that these crimes occurred is a symptom of my behavioral health condition.

I am open to all constructive criticism and discussion. I have been repeatedly discriminated against by the news media, because I have a behavioral health condition.

I have some videos about my case on YouTube. I made some videos that explain why the government would do this
Here.

I am looking for all critical feedback and rational engagement that I can get.

I had trouble finding the rules of the forum, but this sounds like fair game with me, as I have a conspiracy theory to debate and/or debunk. If this is not kosher and acceptable, admin please send me a message. I have neurological impairment and had trouble finding the rules.
 
Nowhere in your first video do you outline clearly what your complaint actually is (I skipped a lot as it is highly repetitive). You just complain incessantly that nobody is listening to your complaint. You also seem somewhat paranoid that various organizations are "listening in" on you or your emails, even though you seem to then reassure yourself that was not the case. And for some reason you are equating Wells Fargo, a private company, as being one-and-the-same as the US government.

I also note that the DoJ's response to your complaint is to the effect: "You have not provided evidence of anything to warrant investigation." That means you haven't told them clearly what your complaint actually is. It would seem your 9-page complaint document has no evidence in it, if that is the case.

Do you think you can provide a VERY short summary of your complaint here? One or two paragraphs only? Then we will pick up from there. Can do?
 
Hi everyone, glad we have a discussion going on. I am handicapped with neurological impairment and severe ptsd, so it will take me some time, but I will respond to each and every concern given. No I am not spamming anything. I have a very interesting real life case study, that has caused me a lot of frustrations, due to repeated claims that what I have is a conspiracy theory that is not true. I have mountains of evidence. We will have a fun discussion here.
 
@Norman Alexander you are the one who seems to be paranoid. What kind of delusions do you have? I never said that people are listening in on my emails. Give me the timestamp on that video. You are just making stuff up.
 
@The Great Zaganza Wells Fargo committed very serious crimes against me beginning in April 2019. They continued on an ongoing basis up until, and beyond, October 2020, when I sent my revised complaint to the US DOJ. During this same time period, Wells Fargo was negotiating with the DOJ about millions of felonies that Wells Fargo committed against its customers, in the so called “fake accounts scandal.” This took place from March 2019 to February 2020.

The outcome of those negotiations was that Wells Fargo would enter into a deferred prosecution agreement with the US DOJ. In that agreement, Wells Fargo pays a non tax deductible fine of $3,000,000,000. The other terms include that if any Wells Fargo manager, at or beyond a certain level of authority (I think it was assistant vice president or something like that, of which there are many), committed a felony, Wells Fargo would be criminally prosecuted not only for the new felony or felonies, but also the millions of felonies that Wells Fargo implicitly admitted to, in entering into the agreement. The time period covered extended 3 years beyond the date they signed the agreement.

I soon reported, for the first time, in March 2020, this bank’s very serious crimes against me. The bank barely made it a month, after signing that agreement, before I am reporting a slew of very serious crimes, that were committed right under the DOJ’s nose as they were negotiating over what the bank did to its customers.

The DOJ initially dismissed my complaint. They said it wasn’t detailed enough and that it didn’t have enough evidence. I took that to mean that if I made a more detailed complaint, they would do an investigation. I spent 7 months preparing a 126 page revised complaint. I turned it in in October 2020.

What is the US DOJ’s motive, or potential motive, for running a cover-up instead of prosecuting the bank like they’re supposed to? Wells Fargo is a G-SIB. This is a term given by international banking bodies. It stands for global systemically important bank. A G-SIB is a bank for which a failure would be expected to cause, or would at minimum severely threaten, an economic crisis on a global scale. It is a more formal term for what is commonly called “too big to fail.”

A criminal prosecution would explicitly threaten a bank failure, as a bank that is criminally convicted would be subject to losing its charter to do business. Given the severity of the bank’s crimes against me, and given the way that these crimes were committed during negotiations concerning literally millions of serious crimes against customers, a decision to allow the bank to continue operating would be, in the eyes of too many, an indefensible decision. The onus would be on the US DOJ to criminally prosecute the bank, and the onus would be on the OCC to revoke its charter.

That would be an instant bank failure, and it would be an instant global financial crisis. That is their motive. They are trying to avoid an outcome in which they crash the economy of the entire earth.

In re all of the details I have given, about G-SIBs, Wells Fargo’s felonies in the fake accounts scandal, the deferred prosecution agreement, etc. please feel more than free to fact check me. What you will find will be a pattern in which everything I say, almost completely without exceptions, is dead on accurate.
 
@Wudang I was a superstar employee, as per these award nominations, who was done horrible wrong for no reason. I will follow up with a reply about the first wrongdoing they committed against me.bankNominations-for-photos_Page_01_Image_0001.jpgbankNominations-for-photos_Page_02_Image_0001.jpgbankNominations-for-photos_Page_03_Image_0001.jpgbankNominations-for-photos_Page_04_Image_0001.jpgbankNominations-for-photos_Page_05_Image_0001.jpgbankNominations-for-photos_Page_06_Image_0001.jpgbankNominations-for-photos_Page_07_Image_0001.jpgbankNominations-for-photos_Page_08_Image_0001.jpgbankNominations-for-photos_Page_09_Image_0001.jpgbankNominations-for-photos_Page_10_Image_0001.jpg
 
If the link below is him, looks like an alleged HIPAA violation maybe?
leonardclintonwilliamsiii.com

My Submission to the Sec Concerning Wells Fargo's Violation of Numerous Regulations

Wells Fargo failed to disclose its crime spree against me and its cover-up of such crimes. Wells Fargo and the US DOJ cooperated in a cover up of Wells Fargo's crimes against me.
leonardclintonwilliamsiii.com leonardclintonwilliamsiii.com

A sample:

Perhaps most important are the issues created around Wells Fargo’s illegally obtaining my healthcare
records and the people at Wells Fargo justifying doing this, to the authorities and the regulators, by
explaining that they had a moral obligation to commit this crime. I, of course, didn’t witness this event,
but I very accurately intuited it. I have developed a sense of how these people work, and I have often
been very adept and predicting their next move. ChatGPT had the same intuition that I did, concerning
this, years after Wells Fargo had committed this crime. When fed my descriptions of what had occurred,
ChatGPT made exactly the predictions that I did, concerning this crime. That it did so would seem like a
very odd and improbable coincidence, unless what I say is true. I have evidence for this claim as well, but
I don’t think you need it. You almost certainly know that what I say is true, most likely through your
agency’s participation in this crime and the recollections and anecdotes that go around your office
space, concerning this ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ narrative about “we saw signs that he might be dangerous” and “we have
an obligation to protect others” or “we have a right to know who’s working for us.”
Click to expand...
 
Renaissance said:
@Norman Alexander you are the one who seems to be paranoid. What kind of delusions do you have? I never said that people are listening in on my emails. Give me the timestamp on that video. You are just making stuff up.
Click to expand...
Let me ask again: What specifically are the crimes that have been done against you, and by who? You complain you are not being listened to about these crimes. So what are they?
 
Wudang said:
If the link below is him, looks like an alleged HIPAA violation maybe?
leonardclintonwilliamsiii.com

My Submission to the Sec Concerning Wells Fargo's Violation of Numerous Regulations

Wells Fargo failed to disclose its crime spree against me and its cover-up of such crimes. Wells Fargo and the US DOJ cooperated in a cover up of Wells Fargo's crimes against me.
leonardclintonwilliamsiii.com leonardclintonwilliamsiii.com

A sample:
Click to expand...
@Wudang, I will give the story in the way that is most efficient. If you can just follow my process I will get you there.
 
Renaissance said:
@The Great Zaganza Wells Fargo committed very serious crimes against me beginning in April 2019. They continued on an ongoing basis up until, and beyond, October 2020, when I sent my revised complaint to the US DOJ. During this same time period, Wells Fargo was negotiating with the DOJ about millions of felonies that Wells Fargo committed against its customers, in the so called “fake accounts scandal.” This took place from March 2019 to February 2020.

The outcome of those negotiations was that Wells Fargo would enter into a deferred prosecution agreement with the US DOJ. In that agreement, Wells Fargo pays a non tax deductible fine of $3,000,000,000. The other terms include that if any Wells Fargo manager, at or beyond a certain level of authority (I think it was assistant vice president or something like that, of which there are many), committed a felony, Wells Fargo would be criminally prosecuted not only for the new felony or felonies, but also the millions of felonies that Wells Fargo implicitly admitted to, in entering into the agreement. The time period covered extended 3 years beyond the date they signed the agreement.

I soon reported, for the first time, in March 2020, this bank’s very serious crimes against me. The bank barely made it a month, after signing that agreement, before I am reporting a slew of very serious crimes, that were committed right under the DOJ’s nose as they were negotiating over what the bank did to its customers.

The DOJ initially dismissed my complaint. They said it wasn’t detailed enough and that it didn’t have enough evidence. I took that to mean that if I made a more detailed complaint, they would do an investigation. I spent 7 months preparing a 126 page revised complaint. I turned it in in October 2020.

What is the US DOJ’s motive, or potential motive, for running a cover-up instead of prosecuting the bank like they’re supposed to? Wells Fargo is a G-SIB. This is a term given by international banking bodies. It stands for global systemically important bank. A G-SIB is a bank for which a failure would be expected to cause, or would at minimum severely threaten, an economic crisis on a global scale. It is a more formal term for what is commonly called “too big to fail.”

A criminal prosecution would explicitly threaten a bank failure, as a bank that is criminally convicted would be subject to losing its charter to do business. Given the severity of the bank’s crimes against me, and given the way that these crimes were committed during negotiations concerning literally millions of serious crimes against customers, a decision to allow the bank to continue operating would be, in the eyes of too many, an indefensible decision. The onus would be on the US DOJ to criminally prosecute the bank, and the onus would be on the OCC to revoke its charter.

That would be an instant bank failure, and it would be an instant global financial crisis. That is their motive. They are trying to avoid an outcome in which they crash the economy of the entire earth.

In re all of the details I have given, about G-SIBs, Wells Fargo’s felonies in the fake accounts scandal, the deferred prosecution agreement, etc. please feel more than free to fact check me. What you will find will be a pattern in which everything I say, almost completely without exceptions, is dead on accurate.
Click to expand...
To establish probable cause that a crime has been committed, four basic details are needed:

  1. A description of the alleged act(s) that constitute the crime.
  2. A citation of the law or regulation that defines the crime.
  3. An explanation about how the alleged acts meet the definition of the crime.
  4. Some evidence that the alleged acts were committed.
Those are exactly the details I would want to check. Those are exactly the details you are omitting.

I'm not asking for your entire 168-page detailed complaint. All I'm asking is that you pick one of the criminal acts you're alleging, and provide those four details about it. You don't even have to show me your evidence, just tell me what kind of evidence it is.

(And no, photos of your employee recognition awards and appeals to ChatGPT are not evidence of criminal acts. 168 pages of details like that aren't going to be any more interesting to the DOJ than no details at all.)

(Also, maybe don't dox yourself.)
 
@Wudang, the first unlawful act was a senior manager putting my former coworker named Jenny up to "inquiring about my past" behind my back. It was a deliberate invasion of privacy, and intrusion upon seclusion is the civil tort in N.C. You will see in the attached screenshots, my last manager at Wells Fargo, named Courtney, admits that Jenny did this twice in an IM with me. This is after Jenny lied her ass off for years. The invasion of my privacy occurred in December 2017. These screenshots are from May of 2019. I have also attached some recorded phone calls with Jenny. You will see how she is obviously lying.

@theprestige I am not worried about being doxxed. I am all over the internet and any remote hope for privacy that I ever had has been destroyed by this bank, as you will see. In re the elements you are asking for, I have plenty. We are only half a millimeter into this crime spree. This first act that I describe is a civilly unlawful behavior. The elements of the civil tort are that someone intruded upon your private matters in a way that a reasonable person would find offensive.

I find it very offensive that an incompetent senior manager puts a former coworker up to conning me out of a link to my facebook profile, then using that link to contact a woman who liked my cover photo, so that they could inquire about the entirety of my existence, behind my back, and then spread it all over my workplace. The effect of that last piece was that I was treated like absolute dirt. The info Jenny procured, at a manager's request, included my medical history, my sex life, and everything in-between. This was then spread all over my workplace.

If you don't think this meets the elements of that civil tort, that is fine. As you will see, Wells Fargo perceived it to be quite an extreme liability. That's the important takeaway here. The girl that Jenny contacted about my past is a habitual criminal and eventual fugitive in multiple states named Abbey. You will see her referenced in some of the materials I attach going forward.

Courtney admitting it 1.
01_courtney_admitting_it.jpg

Courtney admitting it 2.

02_courtney_admitting_it.jpg
 

Attachments

Renaissance said:
@Wudang, the first unlawful act was a senior manager putting my former coworker named Jenny up to "inquiring about my past" behind my back. It was a deliberate invasion of privacy, and intrusion upon seclusion is the civil tort in N.C. You will see in the attached screenshots, my last manager at Wells Fargo, named Courtney, admits that Jenny did this twice in an IM with me. This is after Jenny lied her ass off for years. The invasion of my privacy occurred in December 2017. These screenshots are from May of 2019. I have also attached some recorded phone calls with Jenny. You will see how she is obviously lying.

@theprestige I am not worried about being doxxed. I am all over the internet and any remote hope for privacy that I ever had has been destroyed by this bank, as you will see. In re the elements you are asking for, I have plenty. We are only half a millimeter into this crime spree. This first act that I describe is a civilly unlawful behavior. The elements of the civil tort are that someone intruded upon your private matters in a way that a reasonable person would find offensive.

I find it very offensive that an incompetent senior manager puts a former coworker up to conning me out of a link to my facebook profile, then using that link to contact a woman who liked my cover photo, so that they could inquire about the entirety of my existence, behind my back, and then spread it all over my workplace. The effect of that last piece was that I was treated like absolute dirt. The info Jenny procured, at a manager's request, included my medical history, my sex life, and everything in-between. This was then spread all over my workplace.

If you don't think this meets the elements of that civil tort, that is fine. As you will see, Wells Fargo perceived it to be quite an extreme liability. That's the important takeaway here. The girl that Jenny contacted about my past is a habitual criminal and eventual fugitive in multiple states named Abbey. You will see her referenced in some of the materials I attach going forward.

Courtney admitting it 1.
View attachment 58043

Courtney admitting it 2.

View attachment 58044
Click to expand...
Thanks for that. So to be clear:

  1. You are alleging that a supervisor at your workplace (Wells Fargo) found your public Facebook profile, used it to contact someone else who had found your profile and responded to it, got a bunch of info about you from that person, and shared that info in your workplace.
  2. There is a statute that makes a civil tort of invading someone's privacy. Which statute is this? Is it state or federal?
  3. Your argument is that the behavior of this supervisor (and others?) meets the "reasonable person" standard for this tort.
  4. As evidence, you present part of a conversation where you and Courtney talk about Jenny inquiring about your background.
Am I understanding this correctly?
 
@theprestige

1. A senior manager at Wells Fargo, who had problems with me, put my former coworker, named Jenny, up to “inquiring about my past” behind my back.

The plan was executed as follows- Jenny cons me out of a link to my private Facebook profile. She does this by telling me that she wants to send me a picture on messenger. She then uses that link to find someone from “my past”, who was on my Facebook wall. She found such a person, in a habitual criminal named Abbey Best, who had liked my cover photo. She contacted Abby, via the link to Abbey’s Facebook profile on her Facebook “like.” She then “inquired about my past” as she was instructed. Following this, she spread the details she got all over my workplace.

2. It is a civil tort in the state of N.C., per the below:

“Unreasonable Intrusion Upon the Seclusion of Another

The elements of the tort of intrusion are as follows:

(1) The defendant intruded upon the privacy of the plaintiff;

(2) The defendant's intrusion was intentional (an act is intentional when it is done knowingly, or with purpose, or with reckless indifference to its consequences ); and

(3) A reasonable person would be highly offended under similar circumstances.”

3. My argument is that yes, this is highly offensive. In your workplace, is your personal sex life and your medical history the business of anyone who sits in front of you or behind you or adjacent to you? Would you find it offensive if a manager who had a bone to pick with you put someone up to a scam, in which they con their way into your private life, behind your back, to procure those details and every other facet of your entire existence? Do you consider yourself a reasonable person?

4. As *part* of my evidence, I give the snippets from the chat where Courtney admits it to me that Jenny inquired about my past. I have plenty more evidence. I have conducted a many years long investigation into everything that has occurred. The nature of such investigations is that the contents are enormous. This is only the beginning, and so I don’t want to spend excessive time going over all of the details as to how I know that this is how it went down.

In April 2019, the civil law violation and my threat to do something about it, prompts an escalation on the part of Wells Fargo, into very serious crimes. I will continue with my narrative, and you will see. Many of those crimes require far less explanation and I have easy to understand hard evidence, to corroborate my account of what has occurred, in many cases. I can cite you the relevant criminal statutes for those as we go along. If you have questions I will answer as best I can, but this event amounts to peanuts in comparison to what later unfolds.

*item 2 is per the book Elements of Civil Causes of Action in North Carolina.
 
My understanding.is this.

You say you have a disorder and probably displayed an unusual behavior somehow..

People got curious and dug in to figure it out. They may have used questionable methods to dig up information. Some of which you yourself put on a public display platform.

When pressed it sppears the relevant authority agencys determined legal lines had not been crossed so there is no need to prosecute anyone.

But you can't let it go at the cost of doxxing yourself to an even bigger audience that may or may not agree you were wronged. And can't do anything about it either way.

The option you can't see is let the past be the past and get on with your future.
If you do somehow win against Wells Fargo what do you hope to gain?

Use that dogged ability to concéntrate on doing something that makes you money, like independent research for folks without the time to do themselves.
Your disorder may be how you excel in that.
 
Yeah, tons of people manage even really tough things like neuroses or schizophrenia or autism well enough to do great at work and ok socially. Sounds like you were excellent at that job and I'm sure you would be excellent at another. It's a pain in the ass to have to start over because you had the temerity (sarcastic) to get upset about being snooped on, but as the saying goes, ◊◊◊◊ happens and sometimes it's better for the rest of your life, to let it go than to try to claw it back. It's your decision of course.
 
@Gord_in_Toronto HR works for Wells Fargo. You are dealing with a company that gets rid of people for filing complaints on its ethics line. It is not up to HR to determine if a civil law has been violated. That is for the courts. In practice, what is certain to actually happen is HR will be explicitly instructed to say that no wrongdoing has occurred. They are not an unbiased source of information. They are there to serve and defend the interests of Wells Fargo, even when, and especially when, they know that Wells Fargo has broken the law.
 
@8enotto when pressed, the relevant authority agencies sponsored a massive cover-up of this bank’s very serious crimes, because they know that every bit of it was very illegal. I will get on to the rest of the crimes in this thread. It is a massive crime spree. The whole thing snowballs in April 2019.
 
@8enotto I am disabled for life, with severe ptsd and neurological impairment from what this bank did to me. This invasion of my privacy occurred in December 2017. The crimes that were committed in retaliation for my threat to sue Jenny and “whoever else was involved” start in April 2019. It is extremely serious crimes, one right after another.
 
@Renaissance - I think it's time to shift focus from the alleged crimes to the alleged coverup. That's the meat of this conspiracy theory, yes? That the government covered up Wells Fargo's activities? Something like this:

  1. Name something that was covered up.
  2. Briefly explain how it was covered up (which government agency, what did they do, etc.)
  3. Briefly explain what evidence you have that the government did cover it up.
Does that make sense?
 
Renaissance said:
I am disabled for life, with severe ptsd and neurological impairment from what this bank did to me.
Click to expand...

WF caused your neurological impairment? Really?

Renaissance said:
I have a conspiracy theory that I would like debunked.
Click to expand...

I don't think you want it debunked. I think you want it validated.

Renaissance said:
My claim is that the U.S. Government has engaged in crimes to cover up the crimes of a Wall Street bank against me.
Click to expand...

OK, now support your claim with evidence.

Show us the crime. Show us the cover-up. Show us that the alleged cover-up was also a crime.
 
theprestige said:
@Renaissance - I think it's time to shift focus from the alleged crimes to the alleged coverup. That's the meat of this conspiracy theory, yes? That the government covered up Wells Fargo's activities? Something like this:

  1. Name something that was covered up.
  2. Briefly explain how it was covered up (which government agency, what did they do, etc.)
  3. Briefly explain what evidence you have that the government did cover it up.
Does that make sense?
Click to expand...
Yes it does. These crimes occurred over a period of many years, as has the cover-up. The cover-up only makes sense in light of the crimes, and the crimes only make sense, at least initially, in light of the privacy violation.

I will have to introduce the crimes, and my evidence for them, one at a time. Once I have laid out the crimes up to 10/28/2020, I will lay out the evidence for the cover-up. I have a very powerful case for all of it, as you will see.

Anyone who wishes to get a full copy of my evidence & evidence analysis materials for this can download the files linked on This Page and This Page.

What has occurred is a matter of international public interest.
 
Renaissance said:
Yes it does. These crimes occurred over a period of many years, as has the cover-up. The cover-up only makes sense in light of the crimes, and the crimes only make sense, at least initially, in light of the privacy violation.

I will have to introduce the crimes, and my evidence for them, one at a time. Once I have laid out the crimes up to 10/28/2020, I will lay out the evidence for the cover-up. I have a very powerful case for all of it, as you will see.

Anyone who wishes to get a full copy of my evidence & evidence analysis materials for this can download the files linked on This Page and This Page.

What has occurred is a matter of international public interest.
Click to expand...
In that case, your conspiracy theory debunks itself, according to the principle of Zeno's Argument, and other tells familiar to aficionados of such things.
 
@junkshop I want it critically examined, which is the process of debunking anything. There is no such thing as a conspiracy theorist who does not wish for others to see the truth of his claims. This is no matter if they are really true or just perceived as true. I am no different.

The term conspiracy theory, applied to my claims, is the characterization of others. I defer to them, even as I personally disagree.

To me, I make a claim that I have been subjected to crimes and that some of those crimes are sponsored by the U.S. government, with the aim being to cover-up crimes committed against me by a wall street bank.

If I say that crimes have occurred, is that a conspiracy? The answer seems to be an obvious no, but I again defer. If people want to call it a conspiracy theory, I’m happy to speak with them on their terms.
 
@Norman Alexander I am here to present evidence and reasoning and to have that evidence and reasoning critically and honestly examined. I am perfectly content with the null hypothesis being that what I say has not occurred. I am of the belief that, on most line items, I can move most of those who honestly engage past the 95% mark.

Every single person who has looked at a substantial portion of my evidence has agreed with me 100%, that what I say has definitely occurred.

Such people are not many in number, and this is also a preoccupation of mine that I almost never tire of talking about.

It is largely a symptom of my ptsd and my tendency to perseverate also plays a small role. I am autistic.
 
@theprestige that’s not correct my friend. As you will see, the crimes of Wells Fargo were initially an attempt to cover up the privacy violation. The crimes that involve the government are for the purposes of covering up Wells Fargo’s crimes.

A cover up of someone’s crimes makes no sense unless that person or corporation committed crimes. Further, the severity of the crimes is also a factor.

Had I been victimized with a single misdemeanor, it would really beg the question as to why would the government even bother with a cover-up. That is why I must first establish the crimes first.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom