• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories
  • You may need to edit your signatures.

    When we moved to Xenfora some of the signature options didn't come over. In the old software signatures were limited by a character limit, on Xenfora there are more options and there is a character number and number of lines limit. I've set maximum number of lines to 4 and unlimited characters.

Twitter has started blocking unregistered users

shemp

a flimsy character...perfidious and despised
Joined
Nov 5, 2002
Messages
65,611
Location
People's Democratic Republic of Planet X
Twitter has started blocking unregistered users

If you currently try to access Twitter without logging in to your user account, you may find you’re unable to see any of the content that was previously available to the wider public. Instead, you’ll likely be met with the Twitter window that asks you to either sign in to the platform or create a new account, effectively blocking you from viewing tweets and user profiles or browsing through threads unless you’re a registered Twitter user.

Several members of The Verge team have been able to replicate the issue, and it appears to be affecting web access on both desktop and mobile devices. Prior to this change, Twitter allowed people limited access to the platform without an account — you could view public tweets and user profiles, for example, but couldn’t like or leave comments. A window that prevented readers from viewing additional posts until they signed in also previously appeared after the viewer had scrolled past an undisclosed number of tweets, though that at least allowed some access to the platform.

Now, regardless of how you try to access the website — be that the homepage or a direct link to a tweet or profile — you’re immediately met with a sign-in prompt that completely obscures your view. It doesn’t even tease the content with a swift redirect. You simply can’t see anything.

Well, I'm not going to sign up. So I won't be posting any more links to Twitter. I wouldn't give Elmo the time of day. Hell, if I saw him drowning in a river, I'd throw him a cement block.
 
I noticed. I always did think it was kind of hilarious that you could view Twitter without ads if you were not logged in, but if you were logged in you got them. The opposite model would have been better for them and their registered users.
I actually do have an account, which I created semi-accidentally, but have no idea how to get into it or desire to do so.
 
I only check it on occasion to check trending subjects. But their one-word Trending lists are practically useless. When I do find something I might be vaguely interested in, the bog of negativity is unpleasant. Seriously, I don't think there's been a single pleasant thing I've seen on that app.
 
Oh dear, no more Twitter reading for me, oh woe is me.

I know, right. I'm sitting here literally crying in my beer.

I only check it on occasion to check trending subjects. But their one-word Trending lists are practically useless. When I do find something I might be vaguely interested in, the bog of negativity is unpleasant. Seriously, I don't think there's been a single pleasant thing I've seen on that app.

I only ever end up there when following a link posted in this forum.
 
Either that, or Elon is so full of himself that he thought if he blocked unregistered users we'd all sign up just to see what he's saying!

Isn't it obvious, the more registered members he has the more advertisers pay him.
 
What's with this rubbishing Elon vibe?
He rescued Twitter from the anti discussion democrat nutbars surely.I have been following stuff on free Twitter for the first time.
 
Last edited:
Maybe this will convince ISF members to link to something other than tweets. It's annoyed me for awhile. Especially in Russian invasion posts.

What I find most confusing is when people link to a Tweet that is itself a link to an actual news story.

Why not just link to the story? Is Elon paying you?
 
What I find most confusing is when people link to a Tweet that is itself a link to an actual news story.

Why not just link to the story? Is Elon paying you?

Lots of people use Twitter almost as a portal so for them it's "natural" to point folk to the Tweets that they followed to get the new story.
 
What's with this rubbishing Elon vibe?
He rescued Twitter from the anti discussion democrat nutbars surely.I have been following stuff on free Twitter for the first time.


He took away the authoritarian left's ability to censor their political opposition and they ******* hate him for it.
 
Trausti said:
Apparently only temporary.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1674865731136020505

Temporary emergency measure. We were getting data pillaged so much that it was degrading service for normal users!
Really, Elon? The software was so weak that "data could be pillaged" without logging in? Can I suggest that it wasn't the login that was the problem. Or that you are simply inventing a fib out of thin air.

"Let that sink in" indeed. :rolleyes:
 
Elon Musk may have consulted /pol/ about the scraping thing yesterday. He may have posted as 'The Antichrist !SATANZ0Gpo.' and 'The Antichrist !ImUpO/666'. A user recommended rate limits and issues with rate limits are being reported today. Below is a post from 'The Antichrist !SATANZ0Gpo', in reponse to the rate limit suggestion, that says: "Bringing up these ideas with the engineers right now." (the thread isn't safe for work).
http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/432771634/#q432780864

There are a couple of other threads from yesterday where 'The Antichrist !SATANZ0Gpo.' and 'The Antichrist !ImUpO/666' explain a little more about what's going on with twitter. I'm indifferent toward Elon Miusk but I hate twitter and I hope it fails.
 
Last edited:
Twitter has been bad all day, lots of "Cannot retrieve tweets at this time" messages when trying to read threads
 
He took away the authoritarian left's ability to censor their political opposition and they ******* hate him for it.

That's what all the ex lefties I know think, so it's weird to see how hated he is on this forum.
I am not sure how but I see Twitter fine still. I think I must have made an account on this Samsung some time back but treat it as read only.
 
My guess is that this is the first day of a new quarter and Twitter literally has no cash to pay its cloud vendors so they have to cut usage.

Someone said their google hosting expired on June 30.
 
Last edited:
Thinking about it, it's probably more along the lines of, something went badly wrong and they don't know what it was, or how to fix it because, Elon fired all the staff, so they need to pretend they meant to do it, so people don't realise how woefully incompetent the remaining staff are.
 
Last edited:
This could be the heart of it
I might have made a good guess about Google servers earlier.

More platform instability could be in Twitter's near future. In 2018, Twitter signed a $1 billion contract with Google to host some of its services on the company's Google Cloud servers.

Platformer reports Twitter recently refused to pay the search giant ahead of the contract's June 30th renewal date.

Twitter is reportedly rushing to move as many services off of Google's infrastructure before the contract expires, but the effort is "running behind schedule," putting some tools, including Smyte, a platform the company acquired in 2018 to bolster its moderation capabilities, in danger of going offline.

https://www.engadget.com/twitter-ha...-pay-its-google-cloud-contract-161936042.html
 
Last edited:
It's better than that. And Musk is a bigger fool than I thought.

Elon Musk

@elonmusk
To address extreme levels of data scraping & system manipulation, we’ve applied the following temporary limits:

- Verified accounts are limited to reading 6000 posts/day
- Unverified accounts to 600 posts/day
- New unverified accounts to 300/day

Yes I did just check. That is genuine
 
I'm sure the advertisers are going to be thrilled that user engagement is being so heavily restricted.
 
- Verified accounts are limited to reading 6000 posts/day
- Unverified accounts to 600 posts/day
- New unverified accounts to 300/day

I find those number astounding. Limited to those amounts? No one is "reading" that many posts. Obviously it's data miners, but I can't see what useful info they would get from Twitter. (No, you don't have to tell me what it would be. Don't care.)
 
It seems to be effecting a hug number of unverified users though, you soon zip through 600
 
I find those number astounding. Limited to those amounts? No one is "reading" that many posts.

The language here is misleading, though. Yes, no average user genuinely reads 600 tweets a day; but the average user could easily view (read: scroll past) more than 600 tweets in a five to ten minute session or two, assuming he's only stopping to engage with a handful that catch his interest.

Recall that Musk recently began reclassifying "views" as the number of times a given tweet appears on a user's browser screen for any length of time, in order to inflate certain users' engagement numbers.
 
It's a way of forcing people to pay for the blue 'verified' tick
Also the number of spam 'promoted' advert tweets has increased over the last few months, you get one for every three or four regular tweets in a thread
 
It's a way of forcing people to pay for the blue 'verified' tick
Also the number of spam 'promoted' advert tweets has increased over the last few months, you get one for every three or four regular tweets in a thread

Yep, to both of these. The 'promoted' stuff is all crypto, gold, and AI spam.

Meanwhile Musk has announced a slight rise in temporary limits. Posting a link for the evidences; apologies to PC users.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1675214274627530754
 
At least one person has observed that Twitter's implementation of the block to non-logged-in views neglected to account for the fact that its own web app will continuously ping Twitter's servers until it retrieves content to populate the page with. Since that is now "never" thanks to the block, Twitter is effectively DDOSing itself because every time someone loads the home page without being logged in the web app begins spamming ten server requests per second in an endless loop.
 
This is amazing.

I've never had a twitter account but over the last year I've followed lots of links to tweets posted here and elsewhere regarding the war in Ukraine. Now if I click on a link I get an error message and twitter launches a DDOS attack on itself.

We are in the presence of genius.
 

Back
Top Bottom