Found you.
Found you bothI would imagine in the beginning, the paramount objective is to increase the number of users, not to immediately try to turn a profit. If someday it becomes a viable alternative to Twitter, then they will be able to think about how to make money off it. (The "why" I assume is the same as for any other social media platform.)
I went ahead and signed up. @anaxagoras17.bsky.social
Good question - it would of course depend on what he posted and how he posted it. But sites like Bluesky aren't really discussion sites, they are for preaching, sorry getting your important words out to people.how long would they have lasted on this forum before being banned ?
Possibly forever. More likely banned in a few months after repeated breaches of the MA, especially rules 0 , 11, and 12how long would they have lasted on this forum before being banned ?
Me too. I started going through the people I was following on Twitter and looking for them on Bluesky. If they were on Bluesky I followed them there and unfollowed them on Twitter. Now I'm down to mostly just government agencies on Twitter. Bluesky is adding about a million people a day.In the last 2 days I've found many of the accounts I used to follow on Twitter now on Bluesky.
Hoot Suite used to do that with multiple platforms. Not sure if it's still the standard or if it does BlueSky.It seems like more of the people I follow are joining every day and I'm trying to recruit the rest.
It has to be tough for journalists who now have to post on multiple platforms to reach the same audience. It would be nice if some third party came out with a tool that allows you to post to your account on multiple services in one step.
looks like I caught a bot on my bluesky account - no posts, follows 400 accounts, is followed by a couple.
Also it doesn't matter how good the operating system is, if you cannot get the software for it. In the case of social media, the analogue is the other users.Me too. I started going through the people I was following on Twitter and looking for them on Bluesky. If they were on Bluesky I followed them there and unfollowed them on Twitter. Now I'm down to mostly just government agencies on Twitter. Bluesky is adding about a million people a day.
I never quite got the hang of Mastodon. It always seemed compare to twitter the way Linux compares to Windows - it works if you want to deal with a steep learning curve and make effort. But not for lazy casual users like me.
Threads works, but I felt like that was just changing out one oligarch (Musk) for another (although in fairness, Zuckerberg is definitely the lesser of those two evils).
Bluesky works and is easy. One can figure out the starter packs and lists and feeds and all that - or you can use it just like twitter with no learning curve and that works fine.
I liked :Okay. I joined BlueSky. Now what? Is democracy restored?
https://bsky.app/profile/explaintrade.com
Dmitry Grozoubinski @explaintrade.com
Appreciate this may not be a universally popular opinion but the less you treat BlueSky as a crusade or cause, and the more you position it as simply a superior user experience with a better governance approach, the more sustainable the growth will be.
Democracy at Bluesky?! Hardly. Their "Trust and Safety Team" reports getting 3000 requests forOkay. I joined BlueSky. Now what? Is democracy restored?
I'd be surprised if that's all the post said.A post by Colin Wright was censored for claiming that
sex is not a spectrum .
Democracy at Bluesky?! Hardly. Their "Trust and Safety Team" reports getting 3000 requests forcensorshipmoderation per hour (that's nearly 1 per second). A post by Colin Wright was censored for claiming that sex is not a spectrum.
Bluesky is a dystopian woke-hole. If that's what you're looking for, act quickly, because their model of censoring everything that isn't in full compliance with their ideology is not sustainable. Unless they democratize, they'll go down the drain the same way Atheist+ did.
I'm enjoying interacting with experts in civil environmentOr maybe most of the users just want to share pictures, video and art or hang out and chat with friends.
Meanwhile, back in the Real World, as opposed to the rightist echo chamber.....Democracy at Bluesky?! Hardly. Their "Trust and Safety Team" reports getting 3000 requests forcensorshipmoderation per hour (that's nearly 1 per second). A post by Colin Wright was censored for claiming that sex is not a spectrum.
Bluesky is a dystopian woke-hole. If that's what you're looking for, act quickly, because their model of censoring everything that isn't in full compliance with their ideology is not sustainable. Unless they democratize, they'll go down the drain the same way Atheist+ did.
It's Wright, he was being deliberately provocative to wind up his followers in the SEGM and the fringe.I'd be surprised if that's all the post said.
Looks like that is still a work in progress. My reading is that the focus is on user experience so the user's "block" request is implemented via their server so they don't see blocked material. Then they seem to suggest that blocking a server would be a community action as is done on Mastodon. I just skimmed it thoughI have read that BlueSky is decentralised, and people can set up their own server. How can they censure and kick out people, then? It doesn’t sound very decentralised to me.
Thanks. I read it, and I think I understand what they are doing. Their main concern seems to be bad actors that implement blocks against others, and they have good ideas for stopping it, or at least keep the impact low.Looks like that is still a work in progress. My reading is that the focus is on user experience so the user's "block" request is implemented via their server so they don't see blocked material. Then they seem to suggest that blocking a server would be a community action as is done on Mastodon. I just skimmed it though
Why are blocks on Bluesky public? | Bluesky
The technical implementation of public blocks and some possibilities for more privacy preserving block implementations — an area of active research and experimentation.docs.bsky.app
Oh, how hard would it be to retool their twitter bots?Reports that Chinese media are worried that their investments in bots, influencers etc on Twitter may be wasted.
Bluesky boom worries Chinese media | Semafor
State outlets, which put considerable resources into amassing millions of followers on Elon Musk’s social media platform, have recently seen their growth plateau.www.semafor.com
Bluesky is designed to be less amenable to such swarms, especially avoiding pile onsOh, how hard would it be to retool their twitter bots?