They are practically chemically identical.
‘Cos he’s an ignorant maga moron.
Of course there are nuts on both sides. But the nuts on the left are perceived as nuts by most. The nuts on the right are running the country. I perceive a little bit of difference there.
My wife suffers from fructose maltolerance. While it is probably not poisonous as such, it certainly makes her writhe in pain, so a ban would not be something I oppose. But then apples (and lots of other stuff) gives her the same pains, and nobody are suggesting that apples should be banned.
High fructose corn syrup is very different from the natural sugar you get from apples oranges watermelon peaches etcetera
No it really isn't. Fructose is fructose, no matter which plant it comes from.
No, high fructose corn syrup is DIFFERENT than normal natural fructose.
And how is that fructose different to fructose sourced in other ways and/or produced by other methods ?
You clearly haven't looked into the well-known negative health effects of fructose, especially HFCS.
Enlighten me as to how HFCS is chemically different to fructose obtained from other sources.
Ive given you a link which discusses how HFCS and fructose in general has many negative health effects that regular glucose and sucrose do NOT.
If you're referring to the Wikipedia article, it does the opposite of what you claim and you still haven't provided any evidence that HFCS is chemically different from fructose from other sources.
Because I have been forced to look into the problems of fructose, I tend to agree with you, but the fructose in HFCS and regular fructose is identical. Most people can digest a certain amount of fructose without ill effects. However, we all know stories about children who get stomach pains after eating too many apples.
Of course apples and sweet fruits should be banned. The problem is Fructose in any form including the 50% that makes up sucrose, it should be pure glucose for sweetening or nothing.
Just like chemicals from natural sources are totally different than the same chemicals from artificial. We need to get rid of Insulin and go back to using natural insulin instead of this artificial insulin they use now.
Yep an apple a day is poison!
You know sucrose is half fructose, so it is poison too. Pure glucose or nothing!!!
Fructose from fruit is surrounded by a large quantity of fiber, and has much less fructose than foods with added HFCS like soda, candy, cookies, etc.
Ok, maybe its not chemically different, but fructose is definitely bad for you in the quantities supplied unnaturally, UNLIKE for naturally occurring fructose in fruit.
Oranges contain practically no fructose
Thank you for the clarification.
Presumably as a diabetic, sucrose causes issues as well
Its in the link I posted. Fructose reacts very differently to the body that sucrose and glucose. Its not new science.
And of course sucrose is poison as well as it is half fructose.
Which link ?
Not literally poison, but too much of it is very bad for the body, in a way that is severely worse than too much glucose or sucrose.
I dont have all the details remembered, but some of it involves I believe how its processed by the pancrease. Glucose and sucrose cause the body to release a hormone to tell it when it is full. Fructose does not do this. And I believe too much fructose over time causes insulin resistance.
Shouldn't have more that 25 grams a day. Can still have a donut once in awhile, contrary to that stupid diabetes awareness commercial where the nosy Karen says to the donut eating diabetic "I thought diabetics shouldn't eat donuts." Yeah you can Karen, just not very often, and only with a balanced diet.
