Or, as Carl Sagan said;
To be fair to Ray-Gun the reich only ever praised him on what they say he did not what on what he or his cabinet actually did. Based on what actually was done, one would be forced to admit that Ray-Gun was a biblical plague inflicted on the country.
“Original Sin”, by that well-known MAGA author Jack Tapper.
Very true, especially if the recent Canadian federal election is anything to go by. The "Trump-light" Pierre Poilievre was a shoo-in for Prime Minister until Trump started his shenanigans and Canada-bashing. The governing Liberals, who were certain to lose the election, instead almost got a majority government.
Canadian politics are not in fact something to go by in regards to US politics.
Just like Alex Jones.
To be fair they were right to laugh at Columbus, famous for proving the earth is pear shaped not remotely round.
Nobody cares how far from Canada you personally are. North Dakota (with its massive 3 electoral votes) might care about what happens in Ottawa, but most Americans do not. Most Americans don't pay any attention to Canadian politics. Most Americans probably can't even name the new Canadian Prime Minister, or even know that an election recently took place. There is no reason to expect Canadian political trends to have any significant effect on American politics.
Only if you are completely incompetent - bombs are released long before you reach the target, obviously.
You do understand that the expression isn't supposed to be taken that literally, right? That I'm not actually flying a plane, I'm not dropping real bombs, and your responses aren't real flak. You do get the concept of metaphorical language, right? To nitpick it as if the correspondence needed to be exact in every respect is to miss the forest for the trees. Oops, there I go again, now you're going to say something about how you can't miss a forest if you're seeing the trees since the forest is the trees.
And yet, who here is actually arguing that Biden was mentally competent, that his handlers didn't understand that, that they were transparent with the public about his condition, or that the public should have been kept in the dark? It's all just tu quoques. The actual substance of what I said isn't really being challenged at all.
Because it's the capital of Canada, the seat of Canada's government, and you claim that you care about Canadian politics.
No ◊◊◊◊. But you asked why we would care about Ottawa. I answered your question.
Look, YOU made it about the Canadian Prime Minister, not me. Either you think his election matters, or it doesn't. If it matters, then what happens in Ottawa matters, because that's where the Prime Minister governs from, not Manitoba. If you only care about what happens in Manitoba and not Ottawa, then you have no reason to care who is Prime Minister.
You are correct, you didn't. Blue Mountain did. And then you joined in on the conversation in support of him. I assumed, incorrectly, that you were actually agreeing with him. More below.
You didn't actually pay attention to Blue Mountain's post when you inserted yourself into our exchange. His post wasn't about whether our relationship with Canada improved or soured, nor was it a comparison of Biden vs. Trump in regards to Canada. He made a claim that the direction of Canadian elections were an indicator of how future US politics might move. Your claim in this post has nothing to do with that. Whatever your opinion about US/Canada relations, they have little to do with what US voters will do, because US/Canada relations are not a top priority for any significant number of US voters.
You do understand that the expression is stupid, based on the assumption that being criticized must mean that you are right, right?
Republicans aren't responsible for Biden's team hiding his decline. Republicans aren't responsible for choosing Biden as the Democratic nominee in 2020. Republicans aren't responsible for making Biden run again, despite the fact that his decline was so far progressed they couldn't successfully hide it anymore. Republicans aren't responsible for the Democrats not running a real primary in 2024. Your hatred for Trump isn't an excuse for any of those choices.
Republicans ARE the other Party in a 2 Party system. It is their responsibility to nominate a Candidate who will follow the Constitution instead of abusing it for personal profit. And when in the Majority, it is their Sworn Duty to oppose any violations by the President, be it a Democrat or Republicans instead of licking his boots 24/7.
Again, this thread isn't about Trump or the Republican party. Nothing they do is an excuse for the coverup of Biden's decline.
Stop with the tu quoque excuses for the coverup of Biden's decline.
when to shoe fits
You mean like the fact that they are not a significant fraction of US voters?
emersoncollegepolling.com
Then my claim is correct.
Except I'm not ignorant, because my claim was correct.
Yes, an autopen signature can be legal. The Department of Justice has stated that the President can direct a subordinate to affix their signature to a bill, which includes using an autopen. There is no federal law prohibiting the use of an autopen for signing documents.
the ONLY person who can determine whether the use of autopen was authorized - before or after it's use - is Biden, no one else.
