Since you mentioned Lockerbie, I have to watch ... seems to just come at the whole array of paranoia and skepticism. He seems fairly open minded and of good humor. Takes a long time to even get to the stated issues... 26:10 that starts.
The first attack and CT is new to me, so that's interesting. Not sure what to make of it. I expected a debunking, but he seems to frame the CT claims favorably and notes government secrecy. Seems like something I might study closer someday.
Lockerbie starts about 34:00. "among the 7 deadliest airliner fatalities" is a curious phrase. It's re: Iran Air 655, actually. Unfortunately, he's nowhere near as knowledgeable on this issue as the first. I'll have to look at Barkham's A-Z list again, but it's cited as a source. Patrick Haseldine isn't an investigative journalist. He seems to find these arguments bunk, and they come across as jumbled theories opposed to evidence and conviction. He fails to notice any positive evidence of Megrahi's innocence (there's plenty), nor any specific problems with the amazingly flawed case and trial, and ends with pointing out he's still alive in Libya, hinting a conspiracy in itself, which he doesn't pause to explore. It's immediately onto 9/11.
From there, whatever.
