Orphia Nay
Penguilicious Spodmaster., Tagger
/me scrolls to the bottom and clicks "OK".
IANAL, so I have no idea what I'm signing off on, but I agree.
PS. Can we make sure all members, including SusanB-M1 (see four posts above) and others, can access this info as well?
Sure, but I would also like confirmation of LashL's answer from Darat or icerat if possible.
From 08/19/2014 from another thread:Why the state of New York?
We're using servers here in Sweden and in the UK, but most of the JREF traffic is in North America, with UK and Oz coming in next. US makes the most sense performance wise. Thought about CDN's but I've had hit and miss experiences with the lower price ones. NYC should give reasonable access for Europe and US and is better than Europe for the Aussies et al.
The Reptilians are taking over! You foolish sheeple!
ETA: The Reptilians don't seem any worse than the previous overlords, so I'll just go ahead and agree
It may have escaped your notice but most of the world doesn't live there.
Those agreements were always public. (as far as I know)
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=30
Everything looks good to me.
Suggestion/Question: What about language protecting the forum from lawsuits by disgruntled members and non-members (something that the JREF has had to deal with before)?
Mods do not have access to the database, so cannot look up details at will. However, names do occasionally get disclosed in the moderation area for operational reasons.
Is there something in the T&C banning the use of Comic Sans? If there isn't, there should be.
Is there something in the T&C banning the use of Comic Sans? If there isn't, there should be.
That's kinda covered by this:Everything looks good to me.
Suggestion/Question: What about language protecting the forum from lawsuits by disgruntled members and non-members (something that the JREF has had to deal with before)?
You are responsible for the content of the messages you post and any consequences that
flow from such posting(s);
or similar?while every reasonable effort will be undertaken by the mod/admin team to address any violation of the T&C's in a reasonable timeframe, the forum/tribetech bears no liability for individual members posts.
It looks good.
That copyright notice is pretty daunting.
Hey! No discrimination against us short people!We could put up a sign:
" You must be this tall to post in the forum."
Thanks. No further questions.Yes, it's being hosted in New York.
Plus I've never been to New York, so if someone wants to sue it gives me an excuse to visit
This is a chestnut:
Copyright on content generated prior to TribeTech’s hosting of the Forum remains with the member, and such content has been republished on the Forum by the James Randi Educational Foundation pursuant to its license. All TribeTech content, the selection, compilation, arrangement and presentation of all materials, and the overall design of the Forum are copyrighted by TribeTech, and are protected by U.S. and international laws. Use of our content without our express prior written permission is strictly prohibited.
No, sorry, the JREF's license to publish does not and cannot transfer along with the database, no matter how often equivocation and other logical fallacies are applied. The JREF will not be publishing the posts because ownership and management of the forum is being transferred to Tribe Tech, and they do not hold license to the posts until and unless a user agrees to that license by posting on the new forum.
I suppose some rather tedious arguments could be made and probably have been made, however, the JREF does not own the content. License to publish applies only to the JREF is the publisher, not an heir or assign such as Tribe Tech, and if JREF insists and agrees that yes, indeed, The JREF is publishing forum content on Tribe Tech's forum, then lo and behold, the JREF will also have to assume responsibility for legal issues arising out of that publishing--boilerplate disavowal of responsibility for posts notwithstanding. You can't have it both ways without sharing the burden.
Either the JREF is separating the forum from its ownership and management or it is not.
WHATever...as long as personal, private information is removed it really doesn't matter much to anybody outside of a small circle of friends.
I've only just quickly read this stuff, so my understanding might be off, but isn't it that the data are being moved, then you get a chance to agree to new forum's t&c?Yeah, there's really no issue here.
Most of the world doesn't live in ANY small geographic region. Fallacy ad Newyorkism.It may have escaped your notice but most of the world doesn't live there.
The JREF has decided to publish the content it has right to publish on the new forum. The cut off date will be anything before the change of ownership of the forum. Think of it this way the JREF has a licence to publish the content of members' posts in a book, the JREF does not have its own printing press so the book is printed and distributed by a book publisher. The book publisher does not own the copyright and the JREF is not seeking to reassign its licence.I've only just quickly read this stuff, so my understanding might be off, but isn't it that the data are being moved, then you get a chance to agree to new forum's t&c?
So what happens to transferred data if you don't agree to the new forum's t&c? Does a Jref forum member's content get deleted from the new owner's forum? If not, how will the new forum differentiate between content to which it has rights, and content to which it has none?
Leaving aside whether a mere licensee can assign anything, the new forum owner is seeking rights greater than those that Jref has. If a member whose content is transferred does NOT agree to the new terms and conditions, the new forum owner may not deal with that content in the same way that it may deal with content of those who do agree. How is it going to differentiate between old content and new content? It'll have acquired everything, but may have rights to deal with only some of it.The book publisher does not own the copyright and the JREF is not seeking to reassign its licence.
Leaving aside whether a mere licensee can assign anything, the new forum owner is seeking rights greater than those that Jref has. If a member whose content is transferred does NOT agree to the new terms and conditions, the new forum owner may not deal with that content in the same way that it may deal with content of those who do agree. How is it going to differentiate between old content and new content? It'll have acquired everything, but may have rights to deal with only some of it.
Avatars aren't dated, are they?There is the date of the post.
Leaving aside whether a mere licensee can assign anything, the new forum owner is seeking rights greater than those that Jref has.
And I'm confused by this, too. Neither JREF nor the new owners are claiming ownership of avatars.Avatars aren't dated, are they?
copyrightWhat extra rights do you mean?
"content"are claiming ownership of avatars.
copyright
"content"