So what form does the resistance take?

Sometimes soldiers do more than that. Does anybody else remember this?
Assassination of Anwar Sadat (Wikipedia)
Sadat’s assassination is not the best analogy, because although the soldiers rid Egypt of a dictator, they also did it to establish a religious state. This did not happen, but they did get a new dictatorship.
ETA: Somebody should tell Trump the story about Sadat. It might make him wet his pants (again?) instead of enjoying his birthday parade.
That is very right. Trump should know that about of the soldiers did not vote for him, and a lot will positively hate him because of the toxic policies that he has created.

But then, Trump probably believes many of his own lies, and really thinks that he is extremely popular with 100% of the soldiers.
 
All analogies only work to some extent. There are always details that distinguish them from what they are analogous to. Otherwise, they wouldn't be analogies.
I don't think Trump believes most of his own lies. He knows who came up with them. If he had actually believed that all Greenlanders love him, he wouldn't have had Vance shift his visit from Nuuk to the Pituffik Space Base. In fact, he would have gone to Nuuk himself, expecting to bathe in the adulation of the Inuits waiting impatiently for him to turn them red, white and blue.
 
It is the sworn duty of every soldier to disobey an illegal order.
And yet, all soldiers are well aware that disobeying any order is the easiest way to make life difficult for themselves. It's drilled into them.
It is not as if the U.S. Army Basic Combat Training is a 10-week program designed to turn civilians into well-trained anti-authoritarian whistleblowers.
In fact, Google's AI doesn't mention it at all.
 
PS.
Sadat’s assassination is not the best analogy, because although the soldiers rid Egypt of a dictator, they also did it to establish a religious state. This did not happen, but they did get a new dictatorship.
That is very right. Trump should know that about of the soldiers did not vote for him, and a lot will positively hate him because of the toxic policies that he has created.
But then, Trump probably believes many of his own lies, and really thinks that he is extremely popular with 100% of the soldiers.
You left out this part of my post, which refers to a another interesting parallel:
When Sadat came into power, he did a lot of stuff that resembled what Trump is attempting to do to 'make Egypt great again'.
Corrective revolution (Egypt) (Wikipedia)
A shorter version:
On 15 May 1971, Sadat announced his Corrective Revolution, purging the government, political and security establishments of the most ardent Nasserists. (Wiki)
Trump and RFK Jr.'s corrective revolution is still ongoing, and they are still purging.

In the case of Sadat, there is this twist to the story:
Sadat encouraged the emergence of an Islamist movement, which had been suppressed by Nasser. Believing Islamists to be socially conservative he gave them "considerable cultural and ideological autonomy" in exchange for political support.
I.e. he empowered the people who went on to assassinate him.
Remember that the guy who got close to shooting Trump was a member of the Republican Party. Possibly disgruntled, but I think that his motive remains unknown. There are more actually disgruntled Republicans now than in the summer of '24, and Republicans tend to own more guns.
 
SCOTUS has ruled that anything President Trump does while presidenting is legal so any order, direct or indirect, is a legal order
That is 100% false. SCOTUS ruled that most of his actions fall under the category of Official Acts, and he cannot be held criminally liable for Official Acts.

That doesn't mean that he can order the FBI to assassinate me cuz I like chocolate.
 
That is 100% false. SCOTUS ruled that most of his actions fall under the category of Official Acts, and he cannot be held criminally liable for Official Acts.

That doesn't mean that he can order the FBI to assassinate me cuz I like chocolate.
So you hope. The definition of official acts is not, I think, well established. It might differ, for example, if he decides for some official reason (which need not, it seems, be true or reasonable) that chocolate, its cultivation, importation and consumption, threatens the pure blood of proper white Americans; it might turn out to be legal to arrest all chocolate eaters, and qualified immunity might protect the occasionally overzealous shooting by an FBI agent who swears he thought he saw a Mars bar bulge in your back pocket as you fled...

IN any case, your rather absurd example does not cover the legality of orders to the military, of whom Trump is, regrettably, commander in chief, meaning that commands uttered in that capacity might well be judged official no matter how odious they are. The obligation, both moral and legal, to disobey such orders might well be confirmed, but unfortunately more likely posthumously.

If you live long enough, we can hope your viewpoint will be vindicated by history, but in the meantime, we'd better tighten our safety belts, cuz it's gonna be a bumpy ride!
 
SCOTUS has ruled that anything President Trump does while presidenting is legal so any order, direct or indirect, is a legal order
No, SCOTUS has ruled that President Trump cannot be prosecuted for anything he does while presidenting, regardless of whether what he does (as an official action of the presidency) is legal.

Another way to put it: SCOTUS has ruled that US presidents have a legal right to commit official actions that break the law.
 
No, SCOTUS has ruled that President Trump cannot be prosecuted for anything he does while presidenting, regardless of whether what he does (as an official action of the presidency) is legal.

Another way to put it: SCOTUS has ruled that US presidents have a legal right to commit official actions that break the law.
Wrong.

He can still be held liable in civil court AND be impeached.

Can he be then criminally prosecuted for official acts that he was impeached for? I believe yes.
 
Wrong.

He can still be held liable in civil court AND be impeached.

Can he be then criminally prosecuted for official acts that he was impeached for? I believe yes.
Yes, I forgot to mention an important caveat. The Supreme Court's decision may indeed allow prosecution of a US president who has been impeached and has also been convicted following that impeachment. It is unclear to me whether the SCOTUS decision would allow any actual investigation of the illegal official acts for which the US president was both impeached and convicted.

As a non-lawyer, I tend to think of prosecution as something to do with criminal acts. But you are right, civil prosecution is an actual thing, and Donald Trump has often been prosecuted for the illegality of his civil acts. In particular, Swalwell v. Trump is a civil prosecution that was filed in the DC District Court. Trump filed to dismiss on grounds of absolute presidential immunity, but the court has already rejected that claim.
 
Arthwollipot's link appears to be broken. Could someone say what it was about?

e.t.a. if you copy the URL that still appears in Arth's post, it will take you to the original video, which is of a US soldier explaining why what Trump is doing is a bunch of ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊. Gutsy, considering she's just the sort of person Fearless Leader and his minions want out of the army already. But maybe she's already on the hit list and figures to say her piece first. In any case, worth the link.
 
Last edited:
They were Just Following Orders, right?
They'd also been told that the people they were using "enhanced interrogation techniques" on were terrorists who presented an immediate threat to American safety and the information they had threatened thousands upon thousands of American lives.

Under those circumstances, perhaps they could be convinced to follow orders
 
I was wondering what Danish anti-Trumpers would do with the slogan No Kings, but they have come up with a solution that won't offend King Frederik or Danish royalists: No Tyrants Protest in Copenhagen (Democrats Abroad)

NO TYRANTS: Copenhagen, Denmark

Time: Saturday, June 14
1:45 – 3:30pm EDT

Location: Kongens Nytorv (in the square across from Magasin)
23 Kongens Nytorv
13:45-15:30 CEST, local time in Copenhagen!

Join us on Saturday, June 14th, 2025 for a No Tyrants - Stand Up for American Democracy march in Copenhagen from Kongens Nytorv to the U.S. Embassy.

It was probably a good idea to change the slogan since the march will pass the Amalienborg Castle on the way from Kongens Nytorv to the U.S. embassy.

ETA:
I can see that the Brits and the Canadians also go with No Tyrants, unlike the Germans, the French, the Swiss and the Italians.
Some European cities, e.g. Vienna, Austria, combine pride parades with anti-Trump protests:
Vienna Pride Parade: No Kings, Only Queens! Pride is Power!
 
Last edited:
Going to local protest by car. Once there it will be an hour or two, and that is how much parking you can get. We had planned to go by bike (my poster is small, nobody reads them when there are over 500) but our third member going made her sign too big to carry by bike.
Not posting anything on social media as I have travel planned. And I have reduced a lot of my presence as well, including all blogs other than hobbies.
 
Very nice protest, mayor has it under control. police in two cuisers, never got out of the car. Governor has some national guard ready in case we start looting and burning. But not at state capitol, the other city.
Enthusiastic honking by drivers on main drag got a little tiresome after an hour.
 
I live in a small city in one of the United States whose name is not California. Our "No Kings" rally was attended by about 1 in 50 of the city's residents. The rally was completely peaceful, as has been true for most or all of today's rallies.

There were four No Kings rallies within an hour's drive, all scheduled at different times, which allowed an organized vehicular counter-protest to show up at all four. I assume most of the relatively small number of folks who drove past multiple times to offer a view of their digitus medius were aligned with that counter-protest.

Police SUVs drove past at regular intervals, and I saw at least one vehicle that identified itself as belonging to the sheriff's department. The nearest thing to a confrontation that I saw occurred when a flat-bed truck pulled in next to the sidewalk where the flag- and sign-holders were standing. It so happened that I was the only male standing along that stretch of sidewalk, which may be why the middle-aged male driver edged his truck forward until he could stare directly at me across his cab and open window. He seemed to want nothing more than a staring contest, so I just stared back. After a minute or so, he began to move his truck forward, apparently seeking greater joy. He didn't notice a police SUV arrive in the opposite lane. It turned on its flashing light and signalled for a U-turn. As the police officer waited for traffic to move out of the way so he could complete his U-turn, a rather agitated middle-aged woman stepped from the sidewalk out into the street in front of me, obviously intent on offering the truck driver her opinion of his behavior. A couple of us pulled her back onto the sidewalk, pointing out that she was obstructing the path of a police vehicle. The police officer conducted the apparent equivalent of a traffic stop, talking to the truck driver for a few minutes before going back to his vehicle, writing for a bit, and then returning for a short discussion with the truck driver. Back in his SUV, the officer waited for the truck driver to pull back into traffic and then followed him down the street.

That's today's news from Lake Wobegon Trump country.
 
Some bikers showed up at the Clark Park demonstration here in Detroit. There was a bit of a fight, but the cops broke it up.

No, I wasn't there. I'm a tad too old for that kinda line dance.
 
There were some rallies here in Norway, too. They renamed them No Dictators because, well, we have a king, so they found that name kinda awkward when applied here :P .
 
I went to one on Long Island. A friend told me they thought 2000 showed up. I saw no clashes and one trumper drove by shouting from a bullhorn but nothing came of it.
 
It's my party, and I'll cry if I want to, cry if I want to, cry if I want to ...

This footage of Trump 'enjoying' his parade is wonderful!
WATCH Trump’s SAD FACE After NO ONE SHOWS UP (Keith Edwards on YouTube, June 15, 2025 - 10:05 min.)
Keith Edwards discusses former President Trump’s gloomy reaction at his militarized birthday celebration on June 14, 2025—where turnout was surprisingly sparse despite the pomp of a $25–45 million parade tied to the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. He captures the contrast between Trump’s sour expression and the subdued atmosphere, noting that key figures like Melania Trump seemed disinterested and that many attendees quietly drifted away before his speech.

OMG: Trump HUMILIATED at his OWN military parade (Bryan Tyler Cohen on YouTube, June 15, 2025 - 8:01 min.)

WATCH: Trump FALLS ASLEEP At His Own Birthday Military Parade (Occupy Democrats on YouTube, June 15, 2025 - 5:39 min.)


Demonstration mod Trump i København (TV2.DK, June 14, 2025)
 
Last edited:
I live in a small city in one of the United States whose name is not California. Our "No Kings" rally was attended by about 1 in 50 of the city's residents. The rally was completely peaceful, as has been true for most or all of today's rallies.

There were four No Kings rallies within an hour's drive, all scheduled at different times, which allowed an organized vehicular counter-protest to show up at all four. I assume most of the relatively small number of folks who drove past multiple times to offer a view of their digitus medius were aligned with that counter-protest.

Police SUVs drove past at regular intervals, and I saw at least one vehicle that identified itself as belonging to the sheriff's department. The nearest thing to a confrontation that I saw occurred when a flat-bed truck pulled in next to the sidewalk where the flag- and sign-holders were standing. It so happened that I was the only male standing along that stretch of sidewalk, which may be why the middle-aged male driver edged his truck forward until he could stare directly at me across his cab and open window. He seemed to want nothing more than a staring contest, so I just stared back. After a minute or so, he began to move his truck forward, apparently seeking greater joy. He didn't notice a police SUV arrive in the opposite lane. It turned on its flashing light and signalled for a U-turn. As the police officer waited for traffic to move out of the way so he could complete his U-turn, a rather agitated middle-aged woman stepped from the sidewalk out into the street in front of me, obviously intent on offering the truck driver her opinion of his behavior. A couple of us pulled her back onto the sidewalk, pointing out that she was obstructing the path of a police vehicle. The police officer conducted the apparent equivalent of a traffic stop, talking to the truck driver for a few minutes before going back to his vehicle, writing for a bit, and then returning for a short discussion with the truck driver. Back in his SUV, the officer waited for the truck driver to pull back into traffic and then followed him down the street.

That's today's news from Lake Wobegon Trump country.

A Ron DeSantis fan?
Ron DeSantis Says Drivers Have Right to Hit Protesters—Is He Right? (Newsweek, June 14, 2025)
 
Some bikers showed up at the Clark Park demonstration here in Detroit. There was a bit of a fight, but the cops broke it up.
No, I wasn't there. I'm a tad too old for that kinda line dance.
What is it with Trump and bikers?
Bikers for Trump (Wikipedia)
I remember that a German friend of mine back in the 1980s described biker gangs like Hell's Angels and Bandidos as "apolitical fascists," i.e. they emulate the 'virtues' of fascism and/or army life, toxic masculinity, but without political intentions or aspirations. However, Trump is a decrepit old softie who hides away at any sign of a physical altercation.
Trump took shelter in White House bunker as protests raged (AP, June 1 2020)
Unlike Harris, he is not a woman, but what else would he have going for him in the eyes of bikers?
 
This footage of Trump 'enjoying' his parade is wonderful!
I've read some speculation that it might actually have been something other than old man tiredness or jerk grumpiness going on: apparently later Melania (of all people) had to guide him to a podium and keep him from wandering off. Dementia is what is being said, not about ol' Dementia Biden but about Trump. With some comparisons to his speech and manner not in his last term but just a month ago. Time will tell, of course. But Trump's never before stayed quiet while sulking, has he?

Personally, I think the deliquescence of his brain has reached the tipping point where there's now more liquid than solid matter in there. What happens next depends on who around him is ready to seize the reins. Thiel's creature? Or will Musk have wormed his way (back?) in? Or that coterie of Fox News jerks? Interesting times, to be sure.
 
Rep. Jack Kimble on X, June 15, 2025
Before saying not many people showed up, remember this was a military parade and they had both face painting and camouflage booths everywhere. There are tens of thousands of people there, but you just can't see them.

Image

Rep. Jack Kimble:
Republican Representing CA's 54th Dist. & co-sponsor of Poe's Law. Detective Jesus #1: Thou Shalt Not Kill is out on Amazon http://amzn.to/3aDgUmi.
 
Last edited:
Dammit! I was hoping to wake up and enjoy some kickass riot footage with my morning coffee but all I get is a parade of White boomers from Reddit.
 

Back
Top Bottom