Sensing Murder

Richard

Muse
Joined
Aug 1, 2001
Messages
960
Here is a letter that I'm sending to media here in Sydney. Does anyone know the real deal with Etta Smith? She was given as an example of a real psychic who sovled a crime.

--------------------

I am writing to you to voice my protest at Network TEN for producing the TV series, ‘Sensing Murder’.

I assure you this is no knee-jerk, ‘all psychics are rubbish’, reaction. My concern is based on two grounds: first, that the claim so-called psychics can and have played a role in solving crimes is false; and second, that their meddling in criminal investigations is, to say the least, counterproductive.

If ‘psychics’ really could solve crimes, wouldn’t every police force around the world have ‘psychic’ division? Imagine the dramatic improvement in clear-up rates, and the deterrent effect on would-be criminals. Imagine the relief to the families of the missing and murdered when the ‘psychics’ provided the answers they so desperately were seeking. I’m afraid that imaging is all you can do as you know as well as I that this is just not the case.

In fact, in terms of criminal investigations, ‘psychics’ are regarded as pests. They waste police time and resources and consistently fail to provide investigators with any information that could lead to the solution of crimes or the discovery of missing persons. And far from helping the families of the missing and murdered, psychics often hound these unfortunate people, using their suffering as a tool of self-promotion.

The great damage that this show will do, apart from giving false hope to the families of the murder victims, is to promote the mistaken belief that ‘psychics’ can and do help the police by using their supposed supernatural powers. The farce that is ‘Sensing Murder’ will no doubt add to this sad situation. All this in the name of ratings as after all, it is a TV show format designed to get bums on seats, not to solve crimes.

If I’m wrong, then where is the evidence? After all these years, which criminal has been convicted, which missing person found due to vital information from ‘psychic powers’?

‘Sensing Murder’ and Network TEN are now in the running to win the annual Bent Spoon Award at our National Convention being held this November in Sydney.

I would also now like to praise the 7 Network for the show, ‘Forensic Investigators’, a fascinating series that promotes the real work of scientific criminal investigations that DO solve crimes.

I leave you with a quote from the father of Genette Tate, a 13-year-old English girl who disappeared in 1978.

Many people came to us offering threads of hope. We clutched at them desperately in the early days… But the promises of the psychics were all lies. They raised false hope in us. At times we really believed we were onto something. The suggestions and ideas preyed on our minds… But always, when it came to the crunch, the so-called leads and ideas led absolutely nowhere but into a pit of despair…

We discovered that the work of the psychics was not just ludicrous and laughable. It was sinister and evil. Once we got into that web of deceit-and that is what it was-we found it very hard to struggle free. None of it ever led anywhere except to despair and disappointment, misery and confusion. We had become enslaved to the suggestions of the psychics.

(From Lynne Kelly’s book, The Skeptic’s Guide To The Paranormal, pp. 154-155)


Yours truly,
 
I was half watching it last night. It was an absolute disgrace, particularly the part where one psychic claimed that the 'spirit' of the victim could not find rest because the family had moved from the area. Absolutely outrageous.

There was nothing new at all that was revealed by the psychics. All the information on the 'gang' that was accused of the murder was common knowledge from the local media.

Rebecca Gibney should be totally ashamed of herself for fronting the show, Ten for being so exploitave of a familie's tragedy, actually interviewing them, then running that comment about them betraying their daughter.

The whole thing was a shambles. They spent half the night rambling on about Paul Denyer, who is a convicted serial killer, then completely drop that train of thought for a completely different one for no reason at all, other than that he didn't have anything to do with it.
 
I refused to watch it on principle. So I have no comment...that is printable here anyway.
 
I know, it’s hard to watch this swill. It’s also hard to go to see ‘psychics’ on stage, but there is a reason I do it. I need to know what the hell I’m talking about. I need to learn more tricks of cold reading. And I have, it seems, at last, caught a well known media ‘psychic’ cheating in his/her (I cannot give the name just yet) stage show. By that I mean using a mentalism routine and not just wishy-washy cold reading. If I play it right and follow up on investigation, I may get this ‘psychic’ to be exposed for the fraud he/she is.

Even though it’s awful to watch or read this ‘psychic’ drivel, it can and does pay off.

BTW, see :

http://www.users.on.net/~ct/skeptic/sensingmurder.jpg
 
Hm, I thought the Etta Smith name sounded familiar, I just read something about her, just a few days ago when reading up about the topic of forensic psychics after Randi mentioned it:

http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/forensics/psychics/8.html?sect=21

(the other chapters are quite intersting as well - you never saw a more wretched hive of scum and villainy as many of theose mentioned in this long article represent)
 

Back
Top Bottom