Lothian
should be banned
Who are these "Asians" - how do I identify them?
Cameras.
Who are these "Asians" - how do I identify them?
It's on-topic here because two racists are trying to use their grouping of humans by "race" to "explain" why the real problem is with the "race" they label as "blacks", and one at least is trying to use pseudoscience as the reason for their racism. They can tart it up as much as they like but that is their position.
My position is the current scientific one:
Also see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_categorization)#Modern_scholarship
Who are these "Asians" - how do I identify them?
Our ancestors? Do you mean Australopithecus? If more recent then perhaps Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Picts, Celts, Danes, Norse, Ordovices, Demetae, Silures, Deceangli or Gaels
Then in the last few hundred years it got far more complicated. I mean look at our royal family! I think scientists have shown that the only person in the UK who can trace all the way back to the first person to step on to English soil is Danny Dyer.
What about the Welsh, the Scottish, the Irish are they also a nationality and an "ancestory"? Are they "racially" different to the English?
Who are these "Asians" - how do I identify them?
Since race has no objective meaning in regards to humans of course people will decide what they consider a race is. What did you think they were doing - using science to come up with what they call a "race"?
Since race has no objective meaning in regards to humans of course people will decide what they consider a race is. What did you think they were doing - using science to come up with what they call a "race"?
You've seen it here with the photo of the British person I've used, according to Trausti that person isn't a member of the "English race" and they can tell simply by looking at them. It's apparently obvious who your "ancestry" is, it's probable that she has more of an "English ancestry" than I have - indeed as my ancestry of being English is only 2 generations as by my great parents none of my ancestors as far as can be traced back are of "English ancestry". But for a racist like Trausti if you look "Asian", "English" or "Black" to them then that's your race. It goes back to the "one drop rule" concept.
And it is important to tackle it in this thread because someone is trying to use their idea of "race" to explain why the USA has high levels of gun killings, whilst side stepping the blaringly obvious reason, which has nothing to do with race of any description.
ETA:
One English person
[qimg]https://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_165cb48e048b30.jpg[/qimg]
Another English person
[qimg]https://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_144f883075c0a9.jpg[/qimg]
Apparently the second one is of the "English race" despite only having at the most two generations of English ancestry, and you can tell that by just looking at their photos.
That doesn't mean there's not English Ancestory. When is the last time an Englishman and a Mongolian shared a common ancestor?
Not suprising. Whenever progressives bray about racial economic or social disparties, Asians cease to exist.
English is both a nationality and an ancestory. This is not hard.
Yoko.Here are an example for you to try:
- LeBron James
- Elizabeth Warren *
- Yoko Ono
- Taylor Swift
Can you find the asian?
There are 4000 Mongolians in the UK. Any that had a child in Mongolia and another in the UK would be a common ambassador. Same the other way with an English person in Mongolia. Not sure that your point is.
Are you saying Japanese and Arabs are the same race? They're both endemic to Asia... well most Arabs are some are Africans.
Oh, my sides!
How do parse someone born in Wales of parents born in England, with ancestry including Irish, Scots, French, English, Scandiwegian various and a couple of other odds and sods? Who is married to someone with similar messiness, but including some east European Jewish ancestry?
How about an English person who is not mixed. You knew that was the point, didn't you?
I honestly don't believe you have one.
Racists continue to be Racist. Surprise surprise.
There are no English people who are not mixed, as anyone who knows the slightest thing about English history should know. The neolithic inhabitants were invaded by the Bell Beaker people, who were invaded by Celts, who were invaded by Romans, who were invaded by Angles, Saxons, and Jutes, who were invaded by Norman French, and that is just the starting point. Britain, more than anywhere else, has always been a melting pot of ancestries and cultures.How about an English person who is not mixed. You knew that was the point, didn't you?
There are no English people who are not mixed, as anyone who knows the slightest thing about English history should know. The neolithic inhabitants were invaded by the Bell Beaker people, who were invaded by Celts, who were invaded by Romans, who were invaded by Angles, Saxons, and Jutes, who were invaded by Norman French, and that is just the starting point. Britain, more than anywhere else, has always been a melting pot of ancestries and cultures.
There are no "pure", unmixed English people. English cultural and genetic identity is - by definition - mixed.
Yeah, but, white people tear down streetlamps and set cars on fire after their team wins.
Yeah, but, white people tear down streetlamps and set cars on fire after their team wins.
A white guy wouldn't have picked a football parade, teaming with cops, to do a mass shooting.
Hmm?
Where'd that come from, anyway?
Inasmuch as the entirity of Europe has a shared ancestry, I guess. Because that's where English DNA came from. Depends on how absurdum you want to take this reductio. Ultimately, all humans have shared ancestry.You really don't think that English people have shared ancestory? That if you took a DNA sample that they're not going to have a nearly zero Fst when compared to someone from India?
Inasmuch as the entirity of Europe has a shared ancestry, I guess. Because that's where English DNA came from. Depends on how absurdum you want to take this reductio. Ultimately, all humans have shared ancestry.
A white guy wouldn't have picked a football parade, teaming with cops, to do a mass shooting.
It'll take the poor guy a week to clean out this thread.![]()
Teeming. How do you come to this conclusion?
More than 800 police officers were already on the scene to monitor the parade.
From the earlier link:
Why?
Why is the rate disproportionately high?
Inasmuch as the entirity of Europe has a shared ancestry, I guess. Because that's where English DNA came from. Depends on how absurdum you want to take this reductio. Ultimately, all humans have shared ancestry.
That doesn't mean there's not English Ancestory. When is the last time an Englishman and a Mongolian shared a common ancestor?
Yes, all humans have shared ancestry. All mammals have shared ancestry, too. But, obviously, an Englishman is closer in relation to another Englishman than he is to a Sentinelese.
You really don't think that English people have shared ancestory? That if you took a DNA sample that they're not going to have a nearly zero Fst when compared to someone from India?