• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories
  • You may need to edit your signatures.

    When we moved to Xenfora some of the signature options didn't come over. In the old software signatures were limited by a character limit, on Xenfora there are more options and there is a character number and number of lines limit. I've set maximum number of lines to 4 and unlimited characters.

Predict Trump's first revenge prosecutions!

Liz Cheney's reply to Trump

January 6th showed Donald Trump for who is really is - a cruel and vindictive man who allowed violent attacks to continue against our Capitol and law enforcement officers while he watched television and refused for hours to instruct his supporters to stand down and leave.
The January 6th Committee's hearings and report featured scores of republican witnesses, including many of the most senior officials from Trump's own White House, campaign and Administration. All of this testimony was painstakingly set out in thousands of pages of transcripts, made public along with a highly detailed and meticulously sourced 800 page report.
The Department of Justice conducted its own independent investigation and reached the same fundamental conclusions.
Now, Chairman Loudermilk's 'Interim Report' intentionally disregards the truth and the Select Committee's tremendous weight of evidence, and instead fabricates lies and defamatory allegations in an attempt to cover up what Donald Trump did. Their allegations do not reflect a review of the actual evidence, and are a malicious and cowardly assault on the truth.
No reputable lawyer, legislator or judge would take this seriously." Liz Cheney
 
It's looking bad for Liz

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Liz Cheney has been exposed in the Interim Report, by Congress, of the J6 Unselect Committee as having done egregious and unthinkable acts of crime. At the same time, however, she helped the Democrats lose the Election by giving her support - She is so unpopular and disgusting, a real loser!
 
It's looking bad for Liz
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Liz Cheney has been exposed in the Interim Report, by Congress, of the J6 Unselect Committee as having done egregious and unthinkable acts of crime. At the same time, however, she helped the Democrats lose the Election by giving her support - She is so unpopular and disgusting, a real loser!
The worst thing in Trump's eyes is to be a "loser". Also, he didn't write that. He doesn't know the word "egregious". Sounds like a flunky-edited rant.
 
Last edited:
When asked about the egregious, Trump replied "Very fine people, the egregians, some of them".
Ancient egregian vase, showing peace negotiations in what is now known as Panama.
wringg8t0cz31.jpg
 
Bump! We've gotta be getting close now, what's your bet?
Just guess a category:
Political opponents? Hillary, Kamala, Biden, Dem congresscritters, RINO's?
Those who've prosecuted/persecuted him? Judges, prosecutors, FBI, etc?
Journalists or commentators? He hates lots of those.
Maybe someone in government? Can't be enough just to fire them!
 
Bump! We've gotta be getting close now, what's your bet?
Just guess a category:
Political opponents? Hillary, Kamala, Biden, Dem congresscritters, RINO's?
Those who've prosecuted/persecuted him? Judges, prosecutors, FBI, etc?
Journalists or commentators? He hates lots of those.
Maybe someone in government? Can't be enough just to fire them!
Problem is, if he goes after someone and loses in court (which he could very well do... the US justice system is broken but convictions are not guaranteed) it will harm both his reputation and his ego.

Its quite possible he will do what he did with Hillary Clinton in his first term... spend the time sniping at various targets, but never actually pulling the trigger on any sort of prosecution.
 
Problem is, if he goes after someone and loses in court (which he could very well do... the US justice system is broken but convictions are not guaranteed) it will harm both his reputation and his ego.

Its quite possible he will do what he did with Hillary Clinton in his first term... spend the time sniping at various targets, but never actually pulling the trigger on any sort of prosecution.
A good point, but there's always venue shopping.
 
Problem is, if he goes after someone and loses in court (which he could very well do... the US justice system is broken but convictions are not guaranteed) it will harm both his reputation and his ego.
A good point, but there's always venue shopping.
I will defer to legal experts, but I think they are kind of restricted when it comes to venue shopping in criminal cases, since the location has to be associated with crime that was committed. (So they would have a hard time convicting Fauci or Cheney in North Dakota since none of their supposed crimes were associated with that location, regardless of how many right-wing jury members they could find.)
 
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Liz Cheney has been exposed in the Interim Report, by Congress, of the J6 Unselect Committee as having done egregious and unthinkable acts of crime. At the same time, however, she helped the Democrats lose the Election by giving her support - She is so unpopular and disgusting, a real loser!
STFU, felon.
 
I will defer to legal experts, but I think they are kind of restricted when it comes to venue shopping in criminal cases, since the location has to be associated with crime that was committed.
Correct. For federal criminal charges, Fed. R. Crim. P. 18 requires the charges to be brought in the district where the crime occurred. If this is ambiguous, the venue is the district in which the major part of the crime was allegedly committed. It's that "major part" that leads to arguments over proper venue. Since federal criminal cases generally involve interstate activity and commerce, this can be slightly difficult. But it's not the same as civil cases where everyone just goes to Amarillo, Texas.

(So they would have a hard time convicting Fauci or Cheney in North Dakota since none of their supposed crimes were associated with that location, regardless of how many right-wing jury members they could find.)
The D.C. district court would be the proper venue for charges of criminal activity while engaged in government service in Washington D.C.
 
Witches, witches, everywhere they look they find witchcraft and all kinds of abominable things. So eggregiously, obviously criminal, like you wouldn't believe.

Yet so far it seems to fall a bit short on the whole bringing any actual charges against any people thing. Which is starting to smell a bit like the wrong end of a bull.
 
"Why are my fellow leopards eyeing me hungrily?"
Pretty much, and given that Galaxy Brain Musk's wealth and power is based on loans heavily leveraged on the value of a meme stock dependent on government grants for liquidity, he's pretty easy to take down.

Cut government funding to Tesla and SpaceX and Musk's panhandling inside a month.
 
Pretty much, and given that Galaxy Brain Musk's wealth and power is based on loans heavily leveraged on the value of a meme stock dependent on government grants for liquidity, he's pretty easy to take down.

Cut government funding to Tesla and SpaceX and Musk's panhandling inside a month.
Looking forward to the Night of the Long Fangs, for so many reasons 🐆🐆🍿.
 
Back
Top Bottom