Merged Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? Pt 2

[The Man]

Like next one, a february 8 - 9 days tornado outbreak.

Tornado "outbreak" where? Do try to be precise.

Yes, Coincidentally, the big earthquake in Turkey happened right when there was a full moon, so we were also in the area between the Moon and Saturn.

Too bad you didn't predict it.

It could have been born by chance today, but maybe it was the expanding dark energy that the expanding nuclei of atoms circulate among themselves.

Nope, most likely plate tectonics.

For the same reason, we haven't needed that much sleep the previous two nights. Especially last night.

Who the frick is "we"?

On a small scale, more energy than normal has been available to the cells.

Since cells get energy from sugar and oxygen I suggest you try to cut down if you are having trouble sleeping (the sugar part that is). Don't forget that carbs become sugars, though over a longer period of time.

I predict that biologists will notice this when they bother to study the energy levels of the cells and follow these alignments.

��

I predict biologists already know better than to bother.

 

[Pixie of key]

Earth will be activated more on February 8-9. First, the Earth is in the region between the Moon and Venus, and right after it is in the region between the Moon and Neptune. On February 9, the Moon and Jupiter are still in the transit area. That's why there is a big risk for Tornado Outbreak on February 8 - 9. Snowstorms and heavy rains are known with a delay.

Of course, the risk of earthquakes and volcanic activations is also high, as 5.2 was already a full moon, when the Earth was in the area between the Moon and the Sun, so that early on 6.2 in the area between the Moon and Saturn.

The dark energy originating from Saturn would meet the dark energy originating from the Sun, the Earth and the Moon over a long distance, which would activate that dark energy so that much less of it was pushed through the Earth than normal.

That is, more of it collided with the nuclei of the Earth's atoms and thus the internal pressure of the Earth increased.

If I am correct, this was a factor in the February 6 earthquakes in Turkey, Syria and the USA.

 

[The Man]

Earth will be activated more on February 8-9. First, the Earth is in the region between the Moon and Venus, and right after it is in the region between the Moon and Neptune. On February 9, the Moon and Jupiter are still in the transit area. That's why there is a big risk for Tornado Outbreak on February 8 - 9. Snowstorms and heavy rains are known with a delay.

Of course, the risk of earthquakes and volcanic activations is also high, as 5.2 was already a full moon, when the Earth was in the area between the Moon and the Sun, so that early on 6.2 in the area between the Moon and Saturn.

The dark energy originating from Saturn would meet the dark energy originating from the Sun, the Earth and the Moon over a long distance, which would activate that dark energy so that much less of it was pushed through the Earth than normal.

That is, more of it collided with the nuclei of the Earth's atoms and thus the internal pressure of the Earth increased.

If I am correct, this was a factor in the February 6 earthquakes in Turkey, Syria and the USA.

Ok so no actual predictions, just "a big risk for Tornado Outbreak on February 8 - 9. Snowstorms and heavy rains are known with a delay". So anything that happens you'll just claim has been predicted even if something happens later, it'll just be your "delay". Since you do claim such things are "known with a delay" you already know they tend not to happen when you think your convergences should make it so.

Again, this has to be the dreariest astrology ever, nothing but bad crap is claimed to have been predicted.

 

[Pixie of key]

And from Earth, Saturn is right there in the background of the Sun, almost behind the Sun.

Sun had Massive Plasma Ejection

https://youtu.be/Hu97kFH31Vc

This is how the dark energy originating from Saturn met the dark energy originating from the Moon and the Earth in the opposite sphere inside the Sun on the morning of February 6th.

And now, with a delay, Solar flares are pushing out from the Sun in that very area.

Inside the Earth, the concentrations of dark energy originating from the Moon and Saturn met each other in the opposite sphere on the morning of February 6th.

At the same time, there were big earthquakes in Turkey, Syria, the USA and somewhere else.

Everything is connected to everything.

Is it the case that the current atomic model describes matter completely incorrectly?

Savorinen asks.

Savorinen

 

[Pixie of key]

I was right again. I correctly predicted the timing of February's first tornado outbreak early in January.

Lets start looking timing 2.00

https://youtu.be/vaPJUMKPefk

First i say why february 6 going to be very interesting day.

And yes, it was, you know.

Earthquakes in Turkey and Syria. It was also more than normal in other places, I think, on the day in question.

Then I'll tell you why a tornado outbreak was expected on February 8-9.

The prediction of the Tornado Outbreik time of January 12 was also successful in advance!!!!

February 12 in the area between Uranus and the Moon.

February 14 still in the area between the Moon and Mars.

Of them, Maapallo is still being activated. Some Tornds possibly, but not such a big risk for Outbreak.

February 20th is not a solar eclipse, but the Earth, Moon and Sun are aligned so that Saturn is still in the background of the Sun.

Possibly some degree of activation is also possible then.

Otherwise, the 14th day after February is almost three weeks without activations due to alignments.

Mars seems to be delayed somewhat, but otherwise it should be calm.

Until March 6, the new activation period begins. Saturn and Neptune then play a big role in the background of the Sun.

Let's follow the situation.

The solar eclipse will then be on April 20.

Then Jupiter lurks in the background of the Sun.

 

[The Man]

I was right again. I correctly predicted the timing of February's first tornado outbreak early in January.

Right about what specifically?

Lets start looking timing 2.00

https://youtu.be/vaPJUMKPefk

No one needs to look at your videos. Just write exactly what you were predicting then link to some confirmation of that actually happening.

First i say why february 6 going to be very interesting day.

And yes, it was, you know.

"very interesting day" is an opinion not a prediction because you could apply such an opinion to anything.

Earthquakes in Turkey and Syria. It was also more than normal in other places, I think, on the day in question.

What was "more than normal in other places"? Again is disaster and suffering all your astrology tells you?

What about the 7.3 magnitude Fukushima earthquake in February 2021

The 6.8 offshore in the Tonga region, south of the Fiji Islands February 2022

The 7.0 offshore of Kuril Islands, Russia in February 2020

The 7.5 in Pastaza, Ecuador in February 2019

The 7.2 in Oaxaca Mexico in February 2018

Heck, any of the 15 magnitude 5 to 6.9 earthquakes February 2017

Historically a major earthquake in February, somewhere, is a fairly sure bet.

Then I'll tell you why a tornado outbreak was expected on February 8-9.



The prediction of the Tornado Outbreik time of January 12 was also successful in advance!!!!

"Tornado Outbreik" where? What exactly constitutes an "Tornado Outbreik" in January and /or February? While the slowest part of the year Tornadowise, approaching 200 total by the end of February ain't that unusual.

February 12 in the area between Uranus and the Moon.

February 14 still in the area between the Moon and Mars.

Of them, Maapallo is still being activated. Some Tornds possibly, but not such a big risk for Outbreak.

Again what exactly constitutes an "Outbreak". Historically going into March is always a bigger risk, Tornadowise, than going into February.

February 20th is not a solar eclipse, but the Earth, Moon and Sun are aligned so that Saturn is still in the background of the Sun.

Possibly some degree of activation is also possible then.

Otherwise, the 14th day after February is almost three weeks without activations due to alignments.

Mars seems to be delayed somewhat, but otherwise it should be calm.

Until March 6, the new activation period begins. Saturn and Neptune then play a big role in the background of the Sun.

Let's follow the situation.

The solar eclipse will then be on April 20.

Then Jupiter lurks in the background of the Sun.

So possibly something "interesting" could happen but possibly not or it could even be "delayed somewhat". What exactly constitutes "calm", particularly considering just historical trends? You aren't predicting anything except your own postdiction later.

 

[Pixie of key]

Right about what specifically?



No one needs to look at your videos. Just write exactly what you were predicting then link to some confirmation of that actually happening.



"very interesting day" is an opinion not a prediction because you could apply such an opinion to anything.



What was "more than normal in other places"? Again is disaster and suffering all your astrology tells you?

What about the 7.3 magnitude Fukushima earthquake in February 2021

The 6.8 offshore in the Tonga region, south of the Fiji Islands February 2022

The 7.0 offshore of Kuril Islands, Russia in February 2020

The 7.5 in Pastaza, Ecuador in February 2019

The 7.2 in Oaxaca Mexico in February 2018

Heck, any of the 15 magnitude 5 to 6.9 earthquakes February 2017

Historically a major earthquake in February, somewhere, is a fairly sure bet.



"Tornado Outbreik" where? What exactly constitutes an "Tornado Outbreik" in January and /or February? While the slowest part of the year Tornadowise, approaching 200 total by the end of February ain't that unusual.



Again what exactly constitutes an "Outbreak". Historically going into March is always a bigger risk, Tornadowise, than going into February.




So possibly something "interesting" could happen but possibly not or it could even be "delayed somewhat". What exactly constitutes "calm", particularly considering just historical trends? You aren't predicting anything except your own postdiction later.

Sorry

Too much for you

Dont worry, be happy

 

[steenkh]

Sorry [emoji846]

Too much for you [emoji846]

Yes, too much garbage. You can take any event at any time, and claim that some planet somewhere is causing it, or that the effect is delayed, so it was caused later. If it is not an earthquake, then it could be a tornado, or flooding, or something else. There will always be something.

 

[The Man]

Sorry

Too much for you

Dont worry, be happy

I'm certainly not worried nor is anything here too much for me. Evidently you can't understand that a prediction needs to actually predict something specific, the more specific the better. Not just broad and general claims of something "interesting", "Possibly" "possible", "delayed somewhat" or "calm".

 

[The Man]

Yes, too much garbage. You can take any event at any time, and claim that some planet somewhere is causing it, or that the effect is delayed, so it was caused later. If it is not an earthquake, then it could be a tornado, or flooding, or something else. There will always be something.

That's the thing of it steenkh, this has to be the dreariest most dismal astrology ever. Everything is always negative and destructive never any positivity to it.

Expanding pushing force saved a kitten up in a tree? Nope it destroyed the whole trailer park with a tornado.

Expanding pushing force shake free the soccer ball stuck on your roof? Nope, it collapsed the whole building with an Earthquake.

Expanding pushing force making the weather mild for a bit? Nope that's the lack of 'activation' calm before (after and even during) some astrology alignment strom.

 

[Pixie of key]

Savorinen tells what caused Japan’s big earthquake in March 2011

https://youtu.be/lNxAgU-QAe8





Major Solar Flare Erupts, May Make Auroras Visible in Northern U.S.
By Tariq Malik
published March 10, 2011

”The sun unleashed another major solar flare Wednesday (March 9), a solar storm so powerful it could spawn dazzling northern lights displays that could be visible from even New York City.”
https://www.space.com/11088-northern-lights-major-solar-flare.html

””After four years without any X-flares, the sun has produced two of the powerful blasts in less than one month: Feb. 15th and March 9th,”Spaceweather.com wrote.”
.

.
Coincidentally, the sun had already been very active for a month before the great Tohoku earthquake and Tsunami on March 11, 2011 in Japan.

The question is.

What activated Sun at that time?

And the answer is, the dark energy that all atomic nuclei circulate with all other atomic nuclei.

That is, whenever we have alignments in the Solar System, there is an activation of matter.

From the end of January to the end of March, the inner parts of the Sun were activated with dark energy originating from the planets more than normal because of more than normal alignments where the Sun was in the area between two different planets.

The biggest effect was on Jupiter and Saturn, in the area between which the Sun is at intervals of about 20 years.

Then the Sun was also in the area between Earth and Mars for a long time since the end of January, when it was also briefly in the area between Venus and Uranus and right after that between Venus and Jupiter.

February 15 still in the area between Mars and the Earth, and then also Neptune in the background of Mars. So the Sun was then also in the area between the Earth and Neptune.

And all the time in the region between Jupiter and Saturn.

So it’s no wonder that on February 15, 2011 there was a very powerful solar flare.

And it’s no wonder that the Sun was particularly active for a long time at that time.

And that activates the Earth strongly, of course.

Especially all terrestrial solar flares that are already known to be associated with earthquakes.

In addition to this, all the planets in the background of the Sun activated the Earth, because the dark energy originating from them collided with the cores of the Earth’s atoms more than normal.

The biggest role was played by Uranus, from which the long journey quite directly towards the Sun, a little past the Sun towards the Earth.

That is, the dark energy particles / condensations originating from Uranus met relatively oppositely the dark energy particles / condensations originating from the Sun, pushing through which caused the energy in them to disperse in connection with pushing through each opposing particle into a larger area of space, etc., etc.

Ditto for particles / condensations from Mars.

Mercury, Jupiter and Neptune also played a role to some extent, but Uranus and Mars played the biggest role.

Their influence was greatest inside the Earth always in the area between the center of the Earth and Uranus and in the area between the center of the Earth and Mars.

Then there is this earthward energy released from the Sun on March 9, 2011, which contained much more energy than it is possible to register with our devices.

And this is how the Tohoku earthquake and Tsunami in Japan on March 11, 2011 is explained.

 

[steenkh]

Savorinen tells what caused Japan’s big earthquake in March 2011

So, back in 2011 you made another impressive postdiction!

 

[The Man]

Savorinen tells what caused Japan’s big earthquake in March 2011

https://youtu.be/lNxAgU-QAe8





Major Solar Flare Erupts, May Make Auroras Visible in Northern U.S.
By Tariq Malik
published March 10, 2011

”The sun unleashed another major solar flare Wednesday (March 9), a solar storm so powerful it could spawn dazzling northern lights displays that could be visible from even New York City.”
https://www.space.com/11088-northern-lights-major-solar-flare.html

””After four years without any X-flares, the sun has produced two of the powerful blasts in less than one month: Feb. 15th and March 9th,”Spaceweather.com wrote.”
.

.
Coincidentally, the sun had already been very active for a month before the great Tohoku earthquake and Tsunami on March 11, 2011 in Japan.

Ok, so not only didn't you predict the earthquake you didn't even predict the solar flare.

The question is.

What activated Sun at that time?

And the answer is, the dark energy that all atomic nuclei circulate with all other atomic nuclei.

That is, whenever we have alignments in the Solar System, there is an activation of matter.

From the end of January to the end of March, the inner parts of the Sun were activated with dark energy originating from the planets more than normal because of more than normal alignments where the Sun was in the area between two different planets.

The biggest effect was on Jupiter and Saturn, in the area between which the Sun is at intervals of about 20 years.

Then the Sun was also in the area between Earth and Mars for a long time since the end of January, when it was also briefly in the area between Venus and Uranus and right after that between Venus and Jupiter.

February 15 still in the area between Mars and the Earth, and then also Neptune in the background of Mars. So the Sun was then also in the area between the Earth and Neptune.

And all the time in the region between Jupiter and Saturn.

So it’s no wonder that on February 15, 2011 there was a very powerful solar flare.

And it’s no wonder that the Sun was particularly active for a long time at that time.

And that activates the Earth strongly, of course.

Especially all terrestrial solar flares that are already known to be associated with earthquakes.

In addition to this, all the planets in the background of the Sun activated the Earth, because the dark energy originating from them collided with the cores of the Earth’s atoms more than normal.

The biggest role was played by Uranus, from which the long journey quite directly towards the Sun, a little past the Sun towards the Earth.

That is, the dark energy particles / condensations originating from Uranus met relatively oppositely the dark energy particles / condensations originating from the Sun, pushing through which caused the energy in them to disperse in connection with pushing through each opposing particle into a larger area of space, etc., etc.

Ditto for particles / condensations from Mars.

Mercury, Jupiter and Neptune also played a role to some extent, but Uranus and Mars played the biggest role.

Their influence was greatest inside the Earth always in the area between the center of the Earth and Uranus and in the area between the center of the Earth and Mars.

Then there is this earthward energy released from the Sun on March 9, 2011, which contained much more energy than it is possible to register with our devices.

And this is how the Tohoku earthquake and Tsunami in Japan on March 11, 2011 is explained.

You still seem to be confusing postdiction as prediction.

 

[Blue Mountain]

I just checked this tread for references to Turkey and Syria. There is absolutely nothing there until after the earthquake that has so far claimed over 37,000 lives.

Pixie of key, your asinine "activation" idea heavily concerns itself with earthquakes, tsunamis, and other natural disasters. But what bloody use is it if it can't predict a freaking huge earthquake in a heavily populated country?

 

[Pixie of key]

I just checked this tread for references to Turkey and Syria. There is absolutely nothing there until after the earthquake that has so far claimed over 37,000 lives.

Pixie of key, your asinine "activation" idea heavily concerns itself with earthquakes, tsunamis, and other natural disasters. But what bloody use is it if it can't predict a freaking huge earthquake in a heavily populated country?

Yes, it can't, yet

Or I can't.

If all existing information is fed into a computer related to alignments and natural disasters, then artificial intelligence would be able to predict natural disasters much better than I can.

What is essential when entering data is what season and what time of day it was during the natural disaster.

Where the other planets and the Moon were then.

Had there been terrestrial solar flares before that? How powerful when.

Had strong energy pulses penetrated the Solar System. E.g. from the magnetar star of our own galaxy.

That would be a good start.

Yes, the exact locations where and at what time the natural disaster occurred or intensified rapidly.

Where was the Earth in relation to the Sun, the other planets, the Moon and the supermassive object at the center of the galaxy.

 

[The Man]

Yes, it can't, yet ��

Or I can't.

Well, then stop lying and claiming that you have.

If all existing information is fed into a computer related to alignments and natural disasters, then artificial intelligence would be able to predict natural disasters much better than I can.

Currently just weather models and seismologists can do it much better than you can.

What is essential when entering data is what season and what time of day it was during the natural disaster.

Where the other planets and the Moon were then.

Had there been terrestrial solar flares before that? How powerful when.

Had strong energy pulses penetrated the Solar System. E.g. from the magnetar star of our own galaxy.

That would be a good start.

Yes, the exact locations where and at what time the natural disaster occurred or intensified rapidly.

Where was the Earth in relation to the Sun, the other planets, the Moon and the supermassive object at the center of the galaxy.


��

Well then, you best get started.

If you don't have the inclination to collect your own data, why should anyone else?

Exactly what type of software or AI do you think it would take to make such predictions once you do have your data collected?

What relations do all theses factors take to each other or is your notion simply just 'stuff was like this whan that happened so let's guess that if stuff was like this again that might happen again'?

That is generally referred to as Cargo cult science^WP. Where simply trying to make apparent conditions similar supplants actual understanding of causal relations for an expected result.


However, now having clearly stated that you know you can't make such predictions you can dispense with the pretence that you did, could, have or will.

 

[Pixie of key]

Huge young Galaxies seen by JWST may upend our models of the universe
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...by-jwst-may-upend-our-models-of-the-universe/

"Galaxies spotted by the James Webb Space Telescope seem far too massive to have formed so early on in the universe's history, which could be a problem for our ideas of Galaxy formation.

Many Galaxies in the early universe seem to be far more massive than expected. Researchers using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) spotted Galaxies with masses up to 100 billion times that of the sun that must have formed faster than current models can explain.”



This is exactly what I predicted to be observed with the James Webb telescope.

So it's not space that expands.

Galaxies expanding in space were formed rapidly from the inside / center outwards.

In other words, the supermassive objects that expand in the space of the centers of galaxies were first born in their own 3 big bangs already "far" from each other into the already existing 3 D space. This way, there is no need for a space that expands little by little, and it does not need to expand explosively

From these expanding supermassive objects in space, expanding dark matter is constantly pushed out in zillions of separate expanding dark matter densifications, from which a very large number of new stars expanding in space were born at a rapid pace without a magical pulling force and without the hok-pokke curved space.

That is, at the point when two supermassive objects expanding in space passed close to each other, a new galaxy expanding in space was born from the inside / center outwards.

Or possibly two separate galaxies expanding in space from the inside / center out.

Here is a visually rough description of the birth of one star expanding in space without any pulling forces.

https://youtu.be/QboDTgped1E




In the video, if you could still see how inside these expanding densifications, more and more of what everything basically consists of is pushed inside, then it is avot

Of course, the recycling of this energy / pushing force dispersing into space would also be good to show in a video

Perhaps how the expanding electrons and photons are created from this space-dispersing/expanding dark energy that the expanding atomic nuclei recycle with all other expanding atomic nuclei, it would be good to have it presented as a 3D animation visually

Yay



"While these young Galaxies are massive, they are also surprisingly compact. "What could be going on is that the centers of Galaxies form very early, earlier than we thought, then the rest of the Galaxy builds up around them," says van Dokkum. "I suspect that we're looking at not finished products, but beginnings that happened very quickly."



"then the rest of the Galaxy builds up around them"

Not like this.

That matter has not accumulated little by little into stars in such a way that the stars would then have accumulated little by little into galaxies due to some inexplicable pulling force.

New observable matter expanding in space has been created all the more from the expanding dark matter that is constantly being pushed out of these expanding supermassive objects of expanding galaxies.



"The exact mechanism behind this "fast-track" Galaxy formation - or galactic core formation, as it may be - remains to be seen."



It will be really interesting to watch at what point it occurs to others to consider a completely different way of galaxy formation

Maybe one of us should go and tell these guys how it works.



"If these findings do hold up, it may be a problem for our understanding of the universe more generally, not just Galaxy formation. "It was pointed out to us after we submitted the paper that there wasn't actually enough gas in the universe at that point to form [as many Massive Galaxies as this study suggests] – and that was a bit of a shocker," says Labbe. "If you form these monsters, and they contain more stars than the available gas in the universe, that's a bit of a problem." That may mean we have to take a close look at our models of the early universe and its contents.”



""It was pointed out to us after we submitted the paper that there wasn't actually enough gas in the universe at that point to form [as many Massive Galaxies as this study suggests] – and that was a bit of a shocker," says Labbé.”



Just like this.

More proof that I've been right all along about how the universe really works. How galaxies expanding in space have been born quickly from the inside / center outwards, seemingly as if out of nowhere.

That is, there was no need for visible gas clouds.

The stars expanding in space were born directly from the expanding dark matter, seemingly out of thin air.

But of course that expanding matter was there.

In the dark for us, i.e. unregistered.



Here's a video that roughly shows how stars expand in space

https://youtu.be/QboDTgped1E

 

[The Man]

Huge young Galaxies seen by JWST may upend our models of the universe
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...by-jwst-may-upend-our-models-of-the-universe/

"Galaxies spotted by the James Webb Space Telescope seem far too massive to have formed so early on in the universe's history, which could be a problem for our ideas of Galaxy formation.

Many Galaxies in the early universe seem to be far more massive than expected. Researchers using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) spotted Galaxies with masses up to 100 billion times that of the sun that must have formed faster than current models can explain.”



This is exactly what I predicted to be observed with the James Webb telescope.

No it isn't, you claimed the James Webb telescope would show that galaxies were formed from the inside out and nothing in that article or from the James Webb telescope supports your claim.

So it's not space that expands.

Galaxies expanding in space were formed rapidly from the inside / center outwards.

In other words, the supermassive objects that expand in the space of the centers of galaxies were first born in their own 3 big bangs already "far" from each other into the already existing 3 D space. This way, there is no need for a space that expands little by little, and it does not need to expand explosively

From these expanding supermassive objects in space, expanding dark matter is constantly pushed out in zillions of separate expanding dark matter densifications, from which a very large number of new stars expanding in space were born at a rapid pace without a magical pulling force and without the hok-pokke curved space.

That is, at the point when two supermassive objects expanding in space passed close to each other, a new galaxy expanding in space was born from the inside / center outwards.

Or possibly two separate galaxies expanding in space from the inside / center out.

Here is a visually rough description of the birth of one star expanding in space without any pulling forces.

https://youtu.be/QboDTgped1E

Again nothing in your cited article or from the the James Webb telescope supports your claims above.

In the video, if you could still see how inside these expanding densifications, more and more of what everything basically consists of is pushed inside, then it is avot

Of course, the recycling of this energy / pushing force dispersing into space would also be good to show in a video

Perhaps how the expanding electrons and photons are created from this space-dispersing/expanding dark energy that the expanding atomic nuclei recycle with all other expanding atomic nuclei, it would be good to have it presented as a 3D animation visually

Yay



"While these young Galaxies are massive, they are also surprisingly compact. "What could be going on is that the centers of Galaxies form very early, earlier than we thought, then the rest of the Galaxy builds up around them," says van Dokkum. "I suspect that we're looking at not finished products, but beginnings that happened very quickly."

See, by your own quotation from it, your own citation (as usual) directly contradicts your claims.

"then the rest of the Galaxy builds up around them"

Not like this.

That matter has not accumulated little by little into stars in such a way that the stars would then have accumulated little by little into galaxies due to some inexplicable pulling force.

Well, that's because stars don't become galaxies. Current theories assert that galaxies form from nebula gas clouds and stars form within them.

New observable matter expanding in space has been created all the more from the expanding dark matter that is constantly being pushed out of these expanding supermassive objects of expanding galaxies.

Again, not only does your own citation say nothing of the sort, it contradicts your claims

"The exact mechanism behind this "fast-track" Galaxy formation - or galactic core formation, as it may be - remains to be seen."



It will be really interesting to watch at what point it occurs to others to consider a completely different way of galaxy formation

A ""fast-track" Galaxy formation" isbn't "a completely different way of galaxy formation" it just speeding up the same "way of galaxy formation".

Maybe one of us should go and tell these guys how it works.



"If these findings do hold up, it may be a problem for our understanding of the universe more generally, not just Galaxy formation. "It was pointed out to us after we submitted the paper that there wasn't actually enough gas in the universe at that point to form [as many Massive Galaxies as this study suggests] – and that was a bit of a shocker," says Labbe. "If you form these monsters, and they contain more stars than the available gas in the universe, that's a bit of a problem." That may mean we have to take a close look at our models of the early universe and its contents.”



""It was pointed out to us after we submitted the paper that there wasn't actually enough gas in the universe at that point to form [as many Massive Galaxies as this study suggests] – and that was a bit of a shocker," says Labbé.”



Just like this.

More proof that I've been right all along about how the universe really works. How galaxies expanding in space have been born quickly from the inside / center outwards, seemingly as if out of nowhere.

Again, not in the least, they neither imply, suggest nor hint at anything of the sort. Nor can you even infer such, as their assertions require the opposite. What one can assert from the article is that there may have been more nebula gas around than previously thought. Which would simply mean more or bigger first or early generation stars. Not that surprising since they had no actual observational data to go by when calculating such things.

So, not only is this article not any kind of support for your notions it's not even the blow to current early galaxy formation theories you might like to infer it to be.

That is, there was no need for visible gas clouds.

The stars expanding in space were born directly from the expanding dark matter, seemingly out of thin air.

But of course that expanding matter was there.

In the dark for us, i.e. unregistered.



Here's a video that roughly shows how stars expand in space

https://youtu.be/QboDTgped1E

Again, by all means, please, show observational evidence that stars, galaxies electrons or photons, anything at all, is expanding the way you claim? By just your own assertions you can't because the devices we would use to observe such expansion would themselves be expanding. All you are left with form this word salad of yours is your assertion of matter for stars and galaxies coming "seemingly as if out of nowhere", which we don't observe either.

 

[Pixie of key]

March 8, 2023 seems worrisome considering earthquakes and volcanoes.

The last time the Earth was activated due to alignment was on February 14th. We were then in the region between the Moon and Mars.

The 5th day of February was a full moon and right from the morning on the 6th day the Earth was in the area between the Moon and Saturn.

At the same time, on the 6th of February, the big earthquakes in Turkey and Syria. In my opinion, the rest of the Earth was more active than normal.

The fact that Saturn was almost behind the Sun caused the Earth to be activated more strongly than normal.

I assume so.

It would be about the energy that the nuclei of atoms circulate. About energy that our devices cannot register. From the energy that creates registrable particles such as electrons and photons.

The energy that light waves consist of. Of the zillions of separate dark energy condensations that are needed for the zillions of one electron or photon to be born.

Normally, a lot of this dark energy from other planets and the Moon is pushed through the Earth.

During alignments, less of it is pushed through the Earth. That is, more of it collides with the cores of the Earth's atoms. It increases the Earth's internal pressure.

On March 6, the Earth is in the region between the Moon and Saturn, so that Saturn is on the right side of the Sun's background as seen from the Earth. From there almost to the opposite sphere with the condensations of dark energy originating from the Sun. To an even more direct countersphere with the dark energy densifications from the Moon and Earth.

That is, with the dark energy that is pushed towards the Earth. Dark energy originating from the Earth always meets dark energy originating from other planets directly in the opposite sphere. If the Alignment is completely straight, then the dark energy originating from the Moon meets that dark energy pushing towards the Earth also directly to the opposite sphere, and the straighter the alignment, the more condensations of dark energy push through the counters during their journey before the trajectory hits the Earth.

The more direct the alignment, the stronger the Earth is thus activated.

If Saturn were directly behind the Earth as seen from the Moon tomorrow, then the situation would be very worrying.

But rarely are these alignments so direct. Seen with the solar simulator, Venus was in the region between Earth and Jupiter on March 2, but Jupiter was nowhere near directly behind Venus. If there had been, we would have seen strong weather phenomena on Venus with a delay. Sure, Venus was activated to some extent at that time.

Ok, on the night between March 6 and 7, the Earth will be in the area between the Moon and Mercury.

March 7 is the turn of the full moon, which means that then the Earth is in the area between the Moon and the Sun. Fortunately, there is no Lunar Eclipse. Then the Sun would be directly behind the Earth. In my opinion, after Lunar eclipses, the probability of earthquakes is higher.

From the morning of March 8, the Earth will be in the area between the Moon and Neptune, so that when viewed from the Earth, Neptune is to the left of the Sun in the background.

Where Saturn was on the 6th of February in the early morning.

I don't know how straight that alignment was on February 6th, but if on March 8th the Moon, Earth and Neptune are as straight as the Moon, Earth and Saturn were on February 6th, then there is reason to be worried.

There have been tremors in Turkey from time to time even after February 6. An earthquake of more than 6 on the Richter scale was reported on February 20. It happened to be a new moon then. That is, the Sun, the Moon and the Earth were aligned in such a way that the dark energy originating from the Sun and the Moon was pushed towards the Earth from the same direction.

Dark energy originating from the Earth and the Moon was pushed into the opposite sphere by dark energy originating from the Sun and thus it was activated, etc.

So yes, I am worried about the situation in Turkey, thinking about the sixth, seventh and eighth days of March.

And the sixth day is already tomorrow.

Ps. Even though the previous alignment was on the 14th of February, Maapallo has been activated even after that. There have been several terrestrial solar flares. There have been earthquakes since then.

Some have predicted them and e.g. Thomas Wiren has videos on YouTube related to these predictions.

https://youtu.be/HLuom9-god0



I myself made a video related to the alignments of the following days.

https://youtu.be/0MlRlVaGtls




Let's follow the situation.

Oh yeah. The sun was really active.

It was in the region between the Earth and Saturn and soon in the region between the Earth and Neptune.

Maybe more solar flares.

9th and 10th of March possibly many Tornadoes in USA. Of course, there is a big chance for them already on March 8. And they occur elsewhere too.

 

[The Man]

[Snipped set up for more postdiction astrology]

Have you forgotten some posts back where you admitted you can't actually predict anything? Perhaps you have acquired and programed a super computer since then?

 

[Pixie of key]

Savorinen’s prediction is coming true, the world view is being revolutionized by Webb’s observations


The world’s newest space telescope just found something that shouldn’t exist

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/tech...shouldnt-exist/ss-AA18jlwa?li=AAggNb9#image=2

This is the discovery changing everything we know about our universe

”The James Webb Space Telescope was built by the international community to help humanity better understand the stars, but images captured during a recent space survey may have just made our understanding of the universe even more complicated.”



The Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey

”Pictures taken during the exploration of a patch of night sky close to the Big Dipper found several abnormally old galaxies that should not exist.”



Six massive galaxies

”Hidden within images taken by the James Woods Space Telescope were subtle traces of six massive galaxies that astrophysicists argue must have come into existence shortly after the Big Bang, galaxies so old and so large that they couldn’t possibly be real.”



Way larger than we expected to find

”“These objects are way more massive​ than anyone expected,’ said Joel Leja, a professor of astronomy and astrophysics at Penn State University and one of the researchers who modeled light from the discovered galaxies according to the science news website phys.org.”





Savorinen, that is, I predicted such a noticeable! Galaxies expanding in space were born quickly from the inside / center outwards, and it didn’t need pulling forces or curved space.





Mature galaxies from the dawn of time

””We expected only to find tiny, young, baby galaxies at this point in time, but we’ve discovered galaxies as mature as our own in what was previously understood to be the dawn of the universe,” Leja added.”



“They’re also gigantic”

”“They’re also gigantic,” Strain continued, adding that each galaxy contained “almost as many stars as the modern-day Milky Way Galaxy.””



”These galaxies should not have had time to form”

“”You just don’t expect the early universe to be able to organize itself that quickly. These galaxies should not have had time to form,” Nelson added.”



This changes everything we know

”Leja echoed Nelson’s statement, saying that the “revelation that massive galaxy formation began extremely early in the history of the universe upends what many of us had thought was settled science.””



”Universe breakers”

”According to Leja, several members of the research team have been informally referring to the six supermassive galaxies they discovered as “universe breakers” because of the implications they could have for what we know about the cosmos.”



99% of cosmology models are wrong

”While the science is difficult to understand, it essentially boils down to each of the six galaxies being so large that they cannot coexist with what Leja said was 99% of our current cosmology models.”



Everything is in question now

””It turns out we found something so unexpected it actually creates problems for science. It calls the whole picture of early galaxy formation into question.””




If you want to know how the universe really works.

How the galaxies expanding in space were born quickly from the inside / center outwards into the already existing 3 D space, so start with my first text here on my Uusi Suomi blog.

If some text start with my motherlanguage, there is also english.

Did Albert Einstein lead physicists and cosmologists on a 100-year delusion? Einstein oli väärässä?

https://puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi/ju...sikot-ja-kosmologit-100-vuoden-harharetkelle/

 

[The Man]

Savorinen’s prediction is coming true, the world view is being revolutionized by Webb’s observations


The world’s newest space telescope just found something that shouldn’t exist

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/tech...shouldnt-exist/ss-AA18jlwa?li=AAggNb9#image=2

This is the discovery changing everything we know about our universe

”The James Webb Space Telescope was built by the international community to help humanity better understand the stars, but images captured during a recent space survey may have just made our understanding of the universe even more complicated.”



The Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey

”Pictures taken during the exploration of a patch of night sky close to the Big Dipper found several abnormally old galaxies that should not exist.”



Six massive galaxies

”Hidden within images taken by the James Woods Space Telescope were subtle traces of six massive galaxies that astrophysicists argue must have come into existence shortly after the Big Bang, galaxies so old and so large that they couldn’t possibly be real.”



Way larger than we expected to find

”“These objects are way more massive​ than anyone expected,’ said Joel Leja, a professor of astronomy and astrophysics at Penn State University and one of the researchers who modeled light from the discovered galaxies according to the science news website phys.org.”





Savorinen, that is, I predicted such a noticeable! Galaxies expanding in space were born quickly from the inside / center outwards, and it didn’t need pulling forces or curved space.

Yet none of your quotes or, i expect, the linked article say any such thing. Given your citation history I expect the article even says the galaxies formed from the accretion of nebular clouds but can't be bothered to check your citations for you. So no 'prediction' coming true there. What were your projected rates of galaxy development for that epoch anyway?

Mature galaxies from the dawn of time

””We expected only to find tiny, young, baby galaxies at this point in time, but we’ve discovered galaxies as mature as our own in what was previously understood to be the dawn of the universe,” Leja added.”



“They’re also gigantic”

”“They’re also gigantic,” Strain continued, adding that each galaxy contained “almost as many stars as the modern-day Milky Way Galaxy.””



”These galaxies should not have had time to form”

“”You just don’t expect the early universe to be able to organize itself that quickly. These galaxies should not have had time to form,” Nelson added.”



This changes everything we know

”Leja echoed Nelson’s statement, saying that the “revelation that massive galaxy formation began extremely early in the history of the universe upends what many of us had thought was settled science.””



”Universe breakers”

”According to Leja, several members of the research team have been informally referring to the six supermassive galaxies they discovered as “universe breakers” because of the implications they could have for what we know about the cosmos.”



99% of cosmology models are wrong

”While the science is difficult to understand, it essentially boils down to each of the six galaxies being so large that they cannot coexist with what Leja said was 99% of our current cosmology models.”



Everything is in question now

””It turns out we found something so unexpected it actually creates problems for science. It calls the whole picture of early galaxy formation into question.””




If you want to know how the universe really works.

How the galaxies expanding in space were born quickly from the inside / center outwards into the already existing 3 D space, so start with my first text here on my Uusi Suomi blog.

If some text start with my motherlanguage, there is also english.

Did Albert Einstein lead physicists and cosmologists on a 100-year delusion? Einstein oli väärässä?

https://puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi/ju...sikot-ja-kosmologit-100-vuoden-harharetkelle/

And once again nothing about "How the galaxies expanding in space were born quickly from the inside / center outwards" in your cited quotes. So, as usual, I expect the article to directly counter your claims and assert, directly, the accretion of nebular clouds for galaxy formation. As this has been the historical outcome, if you can't quote your own citation to assert what you claim, in relation to them, I'm just going to assume, as usual, it actually says the exact opposite.

 

[Little 10 Toes]

March 8, 2023 seems worrisome considering earthquakes and volcanoes.

[Big snip about February]

9th and 10th of March possibly many Tornadoes in USA. Of course, there is a big chance for them already on March 8. And they occur elsewhere too.

Where's the earthquakes and volcanos? What happened to the tornadoes in the US?

 

[Pixie of key]

Where's the earthquakes and volcanos? What happened to the tornadoes in the US?

The Turkish region was very active on the 6th and 7th of March.

https://m.emsc.eu/

Fortunately, there were those landward solar flares at the turn of February and March. Without them, the Earth would not have been activated at all for three weeks. And then there would have been that 6-8 march aktivations so that the full moon was 7 days.

We still have to get through the night of March 14 - 15, when Mars, Earth, the Moon, the Butterfly cluster and the supermassive object in the center of the galaxy are about on the same line.

About the corresponding alignment was January 15, 2022.

And then Honga Tonga erupted like an explosion.

Fortunately, an eruption of that size is quite rare.

But with bad luck, the river of gases and water molecules pushing towards the surface from the center of the Earth is diverted out of the Earth from where the volcano is.

Unlikely, but sometimes it happens.

https://youtu.be/BVk5crQtqUs

 

[steenkh]

Fortunately, there were those landward solar flares at the turn of February and March. Without them, the Earth would not have been activated at all for three weeks. And then there would have been that 6-8 march aktivations so that the full moon was 7 days.

We still have to get through the night of March 14 - 15, when Mars, Earth, the Moon, the Butterfly cluster and the supermassive object in the center of the galaxy are about on the same line.

The force of astrology is strong in this one

 

[Little 10 Toes]

The Turkish region was very active on the 6th and 7th of March.

https://m.emsc.eu/

Fortunately, there were those landward solar flares at the turn of February and March. Without them, the Earth would not have been activated at all for three weeks. And then there would have been that 6-8 march aktivations so that the full moon was 7 days.

We still have to get through the night of March 14 - 15, when Mars, Earth, the Moon, the Butterfly cluster and the supermassive object in the center of the galaxy are about on the same line.

About the corresponding alignment was January 15, 2022.

And then Honga Tonga erupted like an explosion.

Fortunately, an eruption of that size is quite rare.

But with bad luck, the river of gases and water molecules pushing towards the surface from the center of the Earth is diverted out of the Earth from where the volcano is.

Unlikely, but sometimes it happens.

https://youtu.be/BVk5crQtqUs

This means nothing. There have been earthquakes in the last 14 days. That's before AND after the 8th of March

Also you specifically called out volcanoes. Nothing happened.

You specifically called out tornadoes. Nothing happened.

You have not commented on those misses.

Why do you still believe when what you claimed did not happen?

 

[Pixie of key]

This means nothing. There have been earthquakes in the last 14 days. That's before AND after the 8th of March

Also you specifically called out volcanoes. Nothing happened.

You specifically called out tornadoes. Nothing happened.

You have not commented on those misses.

Why do you still believe when what you claimed did not happen?

I just practise

Now I know that these earthbound Solar Flares can mess up predictable events.

This time in a good way.

They brought balance to the Earth.

There is currently an imbalance in the solar system, which is why the Earth is sometimes activated several times in a short period of time and then not at all for up to three weeks.

Except if there happen to be these Earth-oriented Solar Flares.

 

[The Man]

I just practise

Wait, you "practise" an ability you yourself claimed you don't have and would need a super computer for?

Now I know that these earthbound Solar Flares can mess up predictable events.

Events you've already claimed you can't actually predict yet. So it's not "earthbound Solar Flares" messing up your predictions. By your own assertions it is just that you can't make such predictions.

This time in a good way.

They brought balance to the Earth.

How, by giving you an excuse for your disaster porn postdictions?

There is currently an imbalance in the solar system, which is why the Earth is sometimes activated several times in a short period of time and then not at all for up to three weeks.

Except if there happen to be these Earth-oriented Solar Flares.

So **** can happen then not happen and you still can't predict what or when but continue to pretend that you have.

 

[The Man]

The force of astrology is strong in this one

That's 'recycled pushing force' of astrology.

Though, now we seem to have a 'landward solar flare' interloper that just messes everything up for the predictions our thread astrologer claims he can't even make, without a supercomputer.

 

[steenkh]

Though, now we seem to have a 'landward solar flare' interloper that just messes everything up for the predictions our thread astrologer claims he can't even make, without a supercomputer.

He should stick to the good old postdictions. He has reliably shown that he can make these with reasonable precision.

 

[Pixie of key]

We had allignment with Mars, Earth, Moon, Butterfly Cluster snd galaxy centre supermassive concentration.

Yesterday we had at least 5 over Five Richter EarthQuakes.

Is this normal day with EarthQuakes?

 

[The Man]

We had allignment with Mars, Earth, Moon, Butterfly Cluster snd galaxy centre supermassive concentration.

Yesterday we had at least 5 over Five Richter EarthQuakes.

Is this normal day with EarthQuakes?

Sure, about average.

How Often do Earthquakes Occur

With about 1,670 earthquakes at 5 M_L or over annually and 365 days in a year that works out to about 4.6 per day on average. Your alignments don't appear to be 'activating' much of anything out of the ordinary. Though, of course you've now got your "earthbound Solar Flares" boogieman to mess up your disaster porn postdictions.

 

[Pixie of key]

Sure, about average.

How Often do Earthquakes Occur

With about 1,670 earthquakes at 5 M_L or over annually and 365 days in a year that works out to about 4.6 per day on average. Your alignments don't appear to be 'activating' much of anything out of the ordinary. Though, of course you've now got your "earthbound Solar Flares" boogieman to mess up your disaster porn postdictions.

Dont Worry, Be Happy

There was also at least one EarthQuake which was over 6 richter.

Also you have there in USA some Huge SnowStorms again.

As you remember. These heavy rains and floods, as well as blizzards and avalanches, are easiest to predict in advance with a delay after these alignments.

It's not about climate change.

It's about the imbalance that the Solar System currently has.

All the gas planets are on the same side of the Solar System and in the spring on the other side of the Solar System than the Earth and us.

 

[Pixie of key]

March 6 Earth Was between Saturn and moon.

March 7 Earth Was Between Sun and Moon.

March 8 Earth Was between Neptune and Moon.

And Now you have these Big Storms over there.

Yes.

About March 14 - 15 there Was also allignment with Mars, Earth, Moon, Butterfly Cluster and galaxy centre supermassive concentration.

And if i remember right.

Earth was between Jupiter and Moon March 9

And between Venus and Moon March 10.



7 activations in 8 days. No wonder there are big storms going on there again.

The activations will continue for the planets and the Moon next time until about the third day of April, and during the six days from that, Saturn, Neptune, Sun, Jupiter, Mercury, Uranus and Venus.

The day of concern is the sixth of April when Jupiter is behind the Sun to the left.

First, the full moon, i.e. in the area between the Sun and the Moon.

And during the same day in the region between Jupiter and the Moon.

From that bunch of activations for February, own storms ago.

Mars later only on the 12th of April.

Be Ready.

 

[The Man]

Dont Worry, Be Happy

Who's worried?

There was also at least one EarthQuake which was over 6 richter.

"over Five Richter" would include "over 6 richter".

Also you have there in USA some Huge SnowStorms again.

Wow, snowstorms in winter, who could have predicted?!?!

As you remember. These heavy rains and floods, as well as blizzards and avalanches, are easiest to predict in advance with a delay after these alignments.

"in advance with a delay" doesn't sound like much of a prediction just sounds like an excuse for postdiction. If "These heavy rains and floods, as well as blizzards and avalanches, are easiest to predict" then why aren't you actually predicting them? Why did you claim you needed a supercomputer to make predictions.

Weather services didn't seem to have a problem predicating them, without delay, and without considering your astrological "alignments".

It's not about climate change.

It's about the imbalance that the Solar System currently has.

All the gas planets are on the same side of the Solar System and in the spring on the other side of the Solar System than the Earth and us.

So what exactly would constitute "ballance", when would that be and what should we expect to happen? Even just by your own assertions your "earthbound Solar Flares" "brought balance to the Earth." with "All the gas planets are on the same side of the Solar System". So even just by your own assertions, your imbalance is, well, balanced.

 

[The Man]

March 6 Earth Was between Saturn and moon.

March 7 Earth Was Between Sun and Moon.

March 8 Earth Was between Neptune and Moon.

And Now you have these Big Storms over there.

Yes.

About March 14 - 15 there Was also allignment with Mars, Earth, Moon, Butterfly Cluster and galaxy centre supermassive concentration.

And if i remember right.

Earth was between Jupiter and Moon March 9

And between Venus and Moon March 10.

��������

7 activations in 8 days. No wonder there are big storms going on there again.

The activations will continue for the planets and the Moon next time until about the third day of April, and during the six days from that, Saturn, Neptune, Sun, Jupiter, Mercury, Uranus and Venus.

The day of concern is the sixth of April when Jupiter is behind the Sun to the left.

First, the full moon, i.e. in the area between the Sun and the Moon.

And during the same day in the region between Jupiter and the Moon.

From that bunch of activations for February, own storms ago.

Mars later only on the 12th of April.

Did you forget your balancing "earthbound Solar Flares"?

https://earthsky.org/sun/sun-activity-solar-flare-cme-aurora-updates/

G2 (moderate) geomagnetic storm is ongoing at the time of this writing. Unsettled to active conditions should remain for the rest of the day. More G1 (minor) geomagnetic storming is anticipated for tomorrow, March 16, and could reach G2 (moderate). All this is due to the flanking effects of the series of arriving CMEs from March 10 through 12, 2023.

Be Ready.

��

Be ready for what? More of your, even postdiction, failures or you ignoring your own "brought balance to the Earth." excuses for such failures?

 

[steenkh]

A strong tornado has devastated a town in the US. Where are the postdictions?

 

[Pixie of key]

A strong tornado has devastated a town in the US. Where are the postdictions?

There was nothing surprising about it. There have been several strong landward solar flares recently. Heavy rains and floods with a delay. Apparently, too Rare Tornadoes Touch Down in Southern California.

 

[steenkh]

There was nothing surprising about it. There have been several strong landward solar flares recently. Heavy rains and floods with a delay. Apparently, too Rare Tornadoes Touch Down in Southern California.

Yes, I also thought that it would be no problem for you to use something (flares, planetary alignments, or whatever) to make statements after the fact.

And since we are close to solar maximum, you’ll have plenty of excuses to postdict just about anything!

Which reminds me: what is a “landward” solar flare? Where do the seaward flares go?

 

[Mojo]

There was nothing surprising about it. There have been several strong landward solar flares recently.

Why didn't you warn people about it?