Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through
If we're in a bidding war, you can have the rights to my story for only 27 million.
Dave
Dave
The same gibberish and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.Astronomers use split images of quasars to produce a new estimate of the Hubble constant ...
The same gibberish and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.How to escape a black hole: Simulations provide new clues about powerful plasma jets...
The same gibberish and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.Team discovers new way supermassive black holes are 'fed'...
Plasma jets do not originate from inside black holes. They consist of matter and energy that are whipped up from just outside the black hole into spirals, which forces them to jet away from the black hole in ways that we can detect. There's no violation of the standard model of black holes - nothing is escaping from inside the event horizon.How to escape a black hole: Simulations provide new clues about powerful plasma jets
The same gibberish and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.
Black holes do not emit any matter. Especially his delusion of "expanding dark substance". The article is about black holes ejecting matter that is outside of the black hole .
Thereis sciencepeopleare scientists who say that black holes can radiate one moment more power than all the stars in the universe.
FTFY
Yet you don't bother to link to them.
<snip>
And then it is claimed that the combination of two black holes will result in a tremendous escape of radiation?!?
������
��
If two bodies are orbiting each other and they are brought closer together then that will release energy. If we are talking about black holes each 20+ times the mass of the sun then that is a lot of energy. I think that is what they talking about. Though most of the articles I have read are rather vague about this point so I could be wrong.
So, you have two black holes which mass in infinity "inside" singularity ja when this two infinity mass collide, you get lot of radiation.
Ok. Where that radiation come from?
You say, black hole centre is singularity. Infinity density mass.
And then you have lot of radiation hokkus pokkus!!?
Your post makes no sense. Please revise and resubmit.
So, you have two black holes which mass in infinity "inside" singularity ja when this two infinity mass collide, you get lot of radiation.
Ok. Where that radiation come from?
You say, black hole centre is singularity. Infinity density mass.
And then you have lot of radiationhokkushocuspokkuspocus!!?
Damn. If you were willing to sell for 28 million I might willing but 38 is too steep for me.
Too bad.
If we're in a bidding war, you can have the rights to my story for only 27 million.
Dave
I'll go 1.5
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.There is sciencepeople who say that black holes can radiate one moment more power than all the stars in the universe.
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.Physicists use supercomputers and AI to create the most accurate model yet of black hole mergers
https://m.phys.org/news/2019-01-physicists-supercomputers-ai-accurate-black.html
"One of the most cataclysmic events to occur in the cosmos involves the collision of two black holes. Formed from the deathly collapse of massive stars, black holes are incredibly compact—a person standing near a stellar-mass black hole would feel gravity about a trillion times more strongly than they would on Earth. When two objects of this extreme density spiral together and merge, a fairly common occurrence in space, they radiate more power than all the stars in the universe."
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.So, you have two black holes which mass in infinity "inside" singularity ja when this two infinity mass collide, you get lot of radiation.
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.After 33 days price is going to be 138 000 000 euros.
So, you have two black holes which mass in infinity "inside" singularity ja when this two infinity mass collide, you get lot of radiation.
Ok. Where that radiation come from?
You say, black hole centre is singularity. Infinity density mass.
And then you have lot of radiation hokkus pokkus!!?
��
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.Ultra-luminous infrared galaxy with strong ionized-gas outflow discovered
https://phys.org/news/2019-01-ultra-luminous-infrared-galaxy-strong-ionized-gas.html
...
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.Active galaxies point to new physics of cosmic expansion
https://m.phys.org/news/2019-01-galaxies-physics-cosmic-expansion.html
Outflow from an active galaxy is not the same thing as outflow from beyond the event horizon of the black hole at its centre. Do you even know what high- and low-ionization potential lines are? What is the difference between the [O III] emission line and the [O II] emission line?Ultra-luminous infrared galaxy with strong ionized-gas outflow discovered
https://phys.org/news/2019-01-ultra-luminous-infrared-galaxy-strong-ionized-gas.html
Galaxys born inside to outside.
"The researchers found that J0916a showcases signatures of an extremely strong outflow in its emission line profiles. They noted that high- and low-ionization potential lines show large velocity dispersions and shifts in relative to the stellar absorption lines. "J0916a shows extreme outflow not only in the [O III] emission line, but also in the [O II] emission line," the paper reads.
The study reveals that the outflow in J0916a most likely extends to a radius of about 13,000 light years. The astronomers say that this outflow is among the most powerful observed in ULIRGs and quasars at redshifts between 0.3 and 1.6, as it has the mass outflow and energy ejection rates estimated to be at a level of around 500 solar masses per year and approximately 400 tredecillion erg/second respectively."
Inside to outside.
Outflow from an active galaxy is not the same thing as outflow from beyond the event horizon of the black hole at its centre. Do you even know what high- and low-ionization potential lines are? What is the difference between the [O III] emission line and the [O II] emission line?
You show zero evidence that you actually understand these papers and what they're saying. You see language that seems to you to correlate with what you believe, and hold them up as evidence. The only thing they are evidence of is your own lack of understanding of physics.
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.Expanding space is naked empire....
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.f galaxygroups moving "in" space faraway from eachother, you dont need expanding space.
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation."The expansion of the universe is the increase of the distance between two distant parts of the universe with time.[1] It is an intrinsic expansion whereby the scale of space itself changes. The universe does not expand "into" anything and does not require space to exist "outside" it. Technically, neither space nor objects in space move. Instead it is the metric governing the size and geometry of spacetime itself that changes in scale."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.We dont need expanding space ...