• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories

[Merged] Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? Pt 2

Pixie of key

Master Poster
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
2,666
I predicted after the 2011 Tsunami Japan that Jupiter's red patch, which has been harvested for more than 300 years, would be intensified.

However, that storm has decreased.

Hence its diameter.

At the same time, however, it has intensified. That is, it gets higher.

Why is that way?

Well, the dark matter from the galaxy's center is expanding within Jupiter when it crashes into the sunset from the sun and starts to push toward the surface of Jupiter, and of course out of the way where a giant storm is.

And the extra pushing force of 2004, 2011 and 2018, this year, will boost its expansion and thus push it into a higher thinner shower.

��
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 4 and rule 6.
Do not post material available elsewhere on the web, and do not post substantial portions of text in languages other than English.


Continued from here.
You may quote and respond to any posts from that thread here.
Posted By: zooterkin
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That is, Jupiter, yes, cycles the Sun and is, together with the supermassive object in the center of the galaxy, the biggest factor in how the solar comets / Sunspots are born.

And yes, other gas planets mess up the cycle.

One potential factor for long silly cycles would be that other gas planets slow down at Jupiter at the point of projecting upwards at a certain depth and thus pushing the stem to reach the protruding above.

And when the speed of some Jupiter launches slowed down sufficiently, the speed of many Jupiter launches would slow down so much that they would never get up to the surface of the Sun.

This is still to be considered, but this is a very worthwhile alternative.

Why could not the 11-year cycle be due solely to the fact that at the time of Saturn, at a certain depth, the sun would bring Jupiter into the groupings so that they would penetrate the Sun's surface at about 11-year intervals.

Uranus and Neptune then together would have their pace slow down so that they would not reach the Sun's surface at all.

Or, on the other hand, the expedited speed of Jupiter's accomplishments is not enough without the added bundle of the yields of Uranus and Neptune,

��

Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 4 and rule 6.
Do not post material available elsewhere on the web, and do not post substantial portions of text in languages other than English.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you remember what happened after the December tsunami in December 2004?

Four of the biggest-sized hurricanes. Katrina and partners. Year was 2005.

That is, the energy pulse that was only sparked after the tsunami of 2004, through the Earth, released from the Earth's center energy that delayed towards the Earth's surface and the seas first warmed up and ultimately pushing power was diverted from the Earth's energy, causing very powerful hurricanes.

And that energy was also thrust into other planets.

Jupiter with a delay in the new red spot little brother red spot jr in 2006.

Astronomers marvel at 'Red Spot Jr'
May 5, 2006

https://www.google.fi/amp/s/phys.org...vel-red-jr.amp


That's the way it is pushing.
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 4 and rule 6.
Do not post material available elsewhere on the web, and do not post substantial portions of text in languages other than English.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I predict that expanding Earth loosing expanding air nore than science people understund.

But it is not problem because we get new expanding air all a time from Earth centre.

Sometimes so fast and a lot that there is Hurricane and Tornadoes.

Earth centre get new expanding gas from galaxy centre supermassive concentration, which expanding and emit dark expanding matter which pushing inside expanding stars and expanding planets.

Yes, this all mide be too much for you.

Dont worry, be happy.

😃
 
Earthquakes and tsunamis happen all the time. There is no season for them, and they are not linked to a position in space:
https://youtu.be/ph7Eczs-nTI

Yes, Earthquake dont need every time some big extra energy from space, maybe.

But expanding matter get expanding pushing force from space all a time.

And this is a reason why expanding tectonic plate pushing that way where is next expanding tectonic plate.

And finally there is Earthquake.

😃
 
NOTE !!!

Sunspots and the Sun's short cycle are proof that the planets are expanding.

Nope, there is no observational evidence that anything is expanding as you assert.


And focus on expanding pushing force into the expanding Sun.

Just as the supermassive object of the galaxy center targets the pushing force of the Stars and the planets that are expanding all the time.

��

Also there no observational evidence for any "pushing force" as you assert.
 
Wolff's minimum of 1280 - 1350
Spherer minimum 1460-1550
Maunder minimum 1645 - 1715
Dalton's minimum of 1790 - 1830
Jokker's special 1940 - 2000

Something strange is the time span that should have been a period of sunshine, but then they were still, or they were still found.

The question is what made Jupiter's work more energy even though Neptune was not on its site at the time.

Was it the 1604 supernova?!?

https://fi.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SN_1604

If so, then we can estimate the delay at which Jupiter times usually reach out to the Sun's surface.

The delay can be estimated to be about 300 to 350 years.

&#55358;&#56596;&#55358;&#56596;&#55358;&#56596;

&#55357;&#56835;
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 4 and rule 6.
Do not post material available elsewhere on the web, and do not post substantial portions of text in languages other than English.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jokkers special was 1938 - 1999, Sunspots because of SN 1604

Wolff's minimum of 1280 - 1350
Spherer minimum 1460-1550
Maunder minimum 1645 - 1715
Dalton's minimum of 1790 - 1830
Jokker's special 1940 - 2000

Something strange is the time span that should have been a period of sunspots minimum, but then they were still, or they were still found.

The question is what made Jupiter's work more energy even though Neptune was not on its site at the time.

Was it the 1604 supernova?!?

https://fi.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SN_1604

If so, then we can estimate the delay at which Jupiter times usually reach out to the Sun's surface.

The delay can be estimated to be about 300 to 350 years.

������

��
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 4 and rule 6.
Do not post material available elsewhere on the web, and do not post substantial portions of text in languages other than English.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The supermassive object of the Galactic Center is expanding and "radiating" to us a dark substance that conveys a pushing force out of the center of the galaxy.


There is no observational evidence for such radiation or "dark substance" as asserted.

In the sun there is an expanding pushing force inside them that causes them to expand into the detectable substance which then protrudes into the Sun's surface.

There is no observational evidence for such "expanding pushing force" as asserted.

Sunsets from Jupiter collide with the Sun when Jupiter is on the opposite side of the Sun in relation to the center of the galaxy.

"Sunsets from Jupiter collide with the Sun" is just gibberish.


By the way.

The dark matter does not pulling to anything.

Curving space is naked empire.

Nucleus of atoms expanding and recycling expanding pushing force which have a nature of electrons and nature of expanding light.

Expanding light moving faster and faster same way what matter and light expanding.

&#55357;&#56835;

Again there is no observational evidence of "light moving faster and faster". As that would alter the frequency to wavelength relation as well as the permittivity and/or permeability (electromagnetic properties) of free space and be readily detectable


So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces.
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 4 and rule 6.
Do not post material available elsewhere on the web, and do not post substantial portions of text in languages other than English.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very interesting.

Sun is more often in the area between some gas planets than that all gas planets would be on the same side of the Sun.

Here, you should concentrate on Saturn, Uranus and Neptune so that when those planets are on the same side of the Sun.

This, maybe, is also worth considering while looking at the shorter cycle of the Sun. 2015 was reported in a shorter cycle with a length of 330 days. Does that cycle spell 340,75 days which would be the average lap of the stone planets around the Sun.
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 4 and rule 6.
Do not post material available elsewhere on the web, and do not post substantial portions of text in languages other than English.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What about that climate warming speculation?!?

Supernova blew and pushed some extra energy into the Sun.

Global warming effect with 300 - 350 years delay.

Will it cool later?

🤔
 
Wolff's minimum of 1280 - 1350
Spherer minimum 1460-1550
Maunder minimum 1645 - 1715
Dalton's minimum of 1790 - 1830
Jokker's special 1940 - 2000

Something strange is the time span that should have been a period of sunspots minimum, but then they were still, or they were still found.

The question is what made Jupiter's work more energy even though Neptune was not on its site at the time.


If Neptune could not be replaced on its own site, it should have been replaced on the highest value available spot, or if all the spots were occupied, as near to its own spot as possible directly towards the top end.
 
Times where the Sun has been in the area between Neptune and the center of the galaxy. The effect of Neptune will take about 40 to 60 years, i.e. start some tens of years before the date I announced and end in the same way some tens of years after the date.
910
1075
1240
1405
1570
1735
1900
2065

Something strange is the time span that should have been a period of sunspots minimum, but then they were still, or they were still found.

The question is what made Jupiter's work more energy even though Neptune was not on its site at the time.

That is, it is assumed that when the Sun is in the area between the supermassive object of the galaxy and the Jupiter, the dark matter of the dark matter originating from the supermassive object would collapse within the Sun from the drifts originating from Jupiter so that the dark matter would expand into perceivable matter and the Sun would get some more substance that would go toward the Sun the surface where it would only be able to get help from other gas floats. The big role would be at least Neptune, whose lap time around the Sun seems to be cyclizing drowsy episodes.

&#55357;&#56835;
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 4 and rule 6.
Do not post material available elsewhere on the web, and do not post substantial portions of text in languages other than English.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wolffin minimi 1280 - 1350
Spörerin minimi 1460 - 1550
Maunderin minimi 1645 - 1715
Daltonin minimi 1790 - 1830
Jokkerin erikoinen 1940 - 2000


Neptunus Uranus
910.........938 ja 1022
1075.......1106 ja 1190
1240........1274 ja 1358
1405........1442 ja 1526
1570.......1610 ja 1694

Look at when Uranus and Neptune were simultaneously on the same side of the Sun as the center of the galaxy.
Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 4 and rule 6.
Do not post material available elsewhere on the web, and do not post substantial portions of text in languages other than English.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jupiter cycles the sun.

Other gasplanets help Jupiter, but sometimes Uranus and Neptunus cant help, because they are same time same side Sun what galaxy centre is

Delay about 330 years.

The Supernova's energy of 1604 sprang into the Sun and helped Jupiter's deliveries up to the surface of the Sun.

So, we did not have a Sunspots minimum 1940 - 2000

Without the supernovas energy they would not reach the surface of the sun.

��
 
Last edited:
Jupiter cycles the sun.

Other gasplanets help Jupiter, but sometimes Uranus and Neptunus cant help, because they are same time same side Sun what galaxy centre is

Delay about 330 years.

The Supernova's energy of 1604 sprang into the Sun and helped Jupiter's deliveries up to the surface of the Sun.

So, we did not have a Sunspots minimum 1940 - 2000

Without the supernovas energy they would not reach the surface of the sun.

��


What's a Jupiter Delivery?


P.S. Fighting the urge to ask about the Klingons ...

 
What's a Jupiter Delivery?


P.S. Fighting the urge to ask about the Klingons ...


There is dark matter / dark pushing force from galaxy centre supermassive concentration.

When Sun is between Jupiter and galaxy centre supermassive concentration, this dark matter particle collide with Jupiter pushing force particle inside Sun.

.
 
2004, 2011 ja 2018 Tsunams and Earthquake, delay and some strong weather phenomena

The solar system has extra energy / pushing force by the Sun and into and in of the planet, releasing energy / pushing force that produces highly affecting weather phenomena.


In December 2004, the tsunami and the earthquake.

Day after that, a very powerful energy pulse penetrates the Earth.

2005 4 x Greatest Class 5 Hurricane and, Much Much Hurricane.

2005 and 2006 strong sunshine.
An energy pulse to the solar system, part of which protruded into the sun and strengthened the expansion and the surface of the new deterrent projecting towards the surface towards the penetration.

Same thing in Jupiter. Jupiter's Red Spot jr 2006 is about a year behind Jupiter.

2011 Japanese Tsunami and Earthquake on March 11, 2011

25 - 28 April 2011 with a short delay of 80 years the biggest and the strongest in the Tornado Horns in the southeastern United States.

According to the article published on June 9, 2011, the largest solar eruption in the last five years, that is, the last hassle, after December 2004 after the delays of the Solar Delay, the largest.

In May 2012 there is a powerful sunshine

2012 In July, 150 years, the strongest solar eruption.

2018 After the Tsunami in Indonesia, there are still no strong Sunsets / Sunstorms

Otherwise, an exceptional weather phenomenon.
California forest fires most recently.

On the other hand, was there a deepening dark matter from the supermassive object of the galaxy center that had expanded intensely within the Sun and thereby exposed the Sun to a new deterrent to the surface of the Sun if it reached its speed of expulsion.

There was, but how close to the Sun's surface had come to pass. Its delay.

🤔
 
Nucleus of atoms expanding and recycling expanding pushing force with "all" other expanding nucleus.

That Expanding pushing force have also nature of expanding light which interactive with other expanding light.

Expanding light moving faster and faster same way what matter and light expanding.

🤔
 
Nucleus of atoms expanding and recycling expanding pushing force with "all" other expanding nucleus.

That Expanding pushing force have also nature of expanding light which interactive with other expanding light.

Expanding light moving faster and faster same way what matter and light expanding.

🤔

Look, predict 2019 and 2020, and we might be impressed.

Anyone can predict the past.

Hans
 
The solar system has extra energy / pushing force ...
The same gibberish that was in the 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread and currently locked continuation.

There is a delusion about predictions. He lists past events and no predictions for them. Fantasies about "energy pluses" are not predictions.
This new thread has a couple of the themes of ignorance, gibberish, lies, insults and delusions in the other thread.
15th June 2009: Pixie of Key is a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.

The linked YouTube videos are more of the same ignorant, primitive videos.
  1. A video ignoring centuries of astronomy (planetary orbits and sunspots).
  2. Video of a rant that The Man cannot explain expanding spacetime when this is easily available textbook physics that The Man has posted several times over the last few years.
  3. Yet another deluded video from him on "Maunder Minimum, Jupiter Giant Red Spot, Reason for Hurricane and Tornados"
  4. Another deluded and even lying video from him on sunspots.
  5. This is a tsunami.
    Thus "What really happend 2004 december 26" is a delusion about "extra energy from space".
  6. This is a tornado .
    Thus "Joplin, Why you had a very srong Tornado 2011" is a delusion about "Extraenergy inside earth centre".
  7. This is the Sunspot cycle. We were in the Modern Maximum from 1914 to at least 2000. Cycle 23 was mild. Cycle 24 (the current one) "is on track to have the lowest recorded sunspot activity since accurate records began in 1750".
    Thus "Reason why there was Sunspots 1940 - 2000, even should not be. Jokkers special" is lying because the sunspot cycle was a maximum from 1914.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Revealing the black hole at the heart of the galaxy

Including the powerful ALMA into an array of telescopes for the first time, astronomers have found that the emission from the supermassive black hole Sagittarius A* at the center of the galaxy comes from a smaller region than previously thought. This may indicate that a radio jet from Sagittarius A* is pointed almost directly toward us.

That's just the laser sights. Wait for the shot.
 
Astronomers use split images of quasars to produce a new estimate of the Hubble constant

https://phys.org/news/2019-01-astronomers-images-quasars-hubble-constant.html

""The UCLA-led team came up with an estimate for the Hubble constant of about 72.5 kilometers per second per megaparsec, a figure in line with what other scientists had determined in research that used distances to supernovas—exploding stars in remote galaxies—as the key measurement. However, both estimates are about 8 percent higher than one that relies on a faint glow from all over the sky called the cosmic microwave background, a relic from 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when light traveled freely through space for the first time.

"If there is an actual difference between those values, it means the universe is a little more complicated," Treu said.""

Expanding space is naked empire.

🤔
 
Damn. If you were willing to sell for 28 million I might willing but 38 is too steep for me.

Too bad.
 
Back
Top Bottom