halleyscomet
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2012
- Messages
- 10,259
A silly anecdote; as I said before, investigate the details, and avoid silly "2+2=5" anecdotes.
Of course, I don't mind attacks supported by sufficient evidence, but attacking absent evidence is not optimal.
I am not attacking you. I am trying to educate you on more effective communication techniques.
I was simply responding in accordance with the comment of another here:
..but I see like some others here, you want to make some form of comment, regardless of the lack of evidence or reason to justify said comment.
What standard of evidence would you want to see applied to assessing your poor communication skills?
You see "ProgrammingGodJordan" and something clicks, and you get the urge to say something likely silly, just for the irrelevant sake of it.
Here is a prime example: Yet another example where a member attacks Jordan, for a particular scope, but totally ignores another member for quite a similar scope.
None of that is relevant to my efforts to teach you how to communicate your ideas more productively.
I'm starting to get the feeling you care more about arguing with people than communicating your ideas.
Last edited: