Or FOR him!
The answer to the title question is that he learned how to manage a dysfunctional organization. He learned enough skills to manipulate technical people. He may even know enough to bully them if he decides too. However, he is not interested in whatever goals the organization has. His skill set seems adequate to create an illusion of accomplishment. Further, I think he both knows and is proud of it!
Maybe he is trying to be the Pointy Haired Boss (PHB) of Dilbert fame. I think that he is basically positioning us. His story is like a boast rather than a request for help. Believe it or not, there are people who emulate that sort of manager. I think his resume will look a lot like that of PHB.
He is boasting about his lack of curiosity. Scientists and technicians are supposed to have a curiosity. Managers are not supposed to have any curiosity. He hasn't told us what he wants to do with the degree. To be fair, none of us asked him what he wants to do with it. The other posters are assuming that he WANTS to produce something useful or interesting. However, he never said that.
There is in implicit statement about his loyalties. He will not value the intellectual or idealogical goals of technical people, or any coworker. In fact, he is making a promise that he won't get close or even pay attention to his coworkers. He is going to direct all extra energy that he has left after work to his family. Which means that he is going to act rather petty at work. He will do whatever provides the means to advance his family.
He made a plausible argument that technical skills are now obsolete. I think this was on purpose. The disconnect between question in the title and the questions in the main body of the message itself is a type of message.I think that he is testing us rather than asking for help. Maybe he is practicing some type of intimidation skills.
He told us how machines can perform much of what technicians and scientists consider 'basic skills'. Further, he informed us that his family is far more important to him than any gain in knowledge.
He asked for us to work for him. I am sitting here in awe of him. He is asking us to do his work for free.
If he really works for anyone, it will be a Machiavellian leader. Or maybe he will be a Machiavellian leader. He is picking us some rather potent social skills for that type of organization.
Is the PHB really that bad?