Recent developments in the Greenland thread.... - Trump is on very recent record as favoring military action for the benefit of the USA against other independent countries - Denmark (Greenland) and Panama. ...
Recent developments in the Greenland thread.... - Trump is on very recent record as favoring military action for the benefit of the USA against other independent countries - Denmark (Greenland) and Panama. ...
Be nice to America, or they'll bring democracy to your country.Yea when america does it, it isn't and invasion but liberation. We are going to Liberate Greenland for example.
MAGA likes Trump because he says what he means, but don't worry, he didn't mean what he said.How does a Trump supporter actually determine when he is lying, and when he is being truthful?
I think Canada has a dedicated, competent military. But America spends so much on its defense, and have so much newer (and often better) equipment, that the US would probably have little or no problem taking out Canada's armed forces quickly. (Our main fighter jets are CF-18s, which are variants of the original F18s and are over 3 decades old; they aren't even the newer 'Superhornets') If it were actual generals involved in the planning, I doubt they would bother with the oil fields (I don't think they would provide any tactical advantage.). Probably take out the air bases in Cold Lake and Bagotville first (since our jet planes would be key in putting up any real defense.)Where along the border do you think the invasion force will focus its initial offensive? Do you think they'll go straight for the capital, or try to find the wartime seat of government wherever in Canadia it is established? Or do you think they'll try to secure the oil sands and oil infrastructure first?
Will the Canadian air force give a good account of themselves, or will they never even get off the ground? Do you think either side will have time to get into the drone warfare game, before it's all over?
We have seen Trump make some pretty bone-headed decisions in his first term (abandoning the Kurds, killing an Iranian general, etc.) If he were thinking 'strategically' he would not done either of those.Trump is random and unpredictable in some ways, but I think it's largely a strategy, not senility.
Except of course when he supported sending forces into both Iraq and Libya. So... not really consistent.I would be shocked to see him invade an ally. Hell, I would be surprised to see him invade an enemy. He has been fairly consistent in not liking US troops deploying to war zones.