• I've created a thread for feedback on the reaction/likes feature Feedback thread
  • You may find search is unavailable for a little while. Trying to fix a problem.

[Merged] Musk buys Twitter!/ Elon Musk puts Twitter deal on hold....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Musk has damaged not just his public image but lost creditbility in the business world over this. He is getting a reputation as being unstable, and major banks and investment companies hate instablity. He might still get some loans, but they will be looked at more closely and the interest will be higher.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Told ya so waaay back at the beginning of the thread on page 5! It's a pattern like Lucy pulling up the football.


http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=13793770#post13793770
Click to expand...

In fact, I beat you by two posts...

angrysoba said:
His antics almost make it look like he's trying to scupper the purchase but in a way that he can blame Twitter.
"The deal is off because you broke the rules"
"See? They hate free speech. They used a heckler's veto. Oh well... I tried guys, but the game is rigged. It's rigged I tells ya!"
Click to expand...
 
angrysoba said:
Looks like it is off. Can’t say I’m surprised.
Click to expand...

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/07/08/tech/elon-musk-twitter-deal-exit/index.html

New York (CNN Business)Elon Musk moved Friday afternoon to terminate his $44 billion deal to buy Twitter — the latest twist in a whirlwind process in which the billionaire Tesla CEO became the company's biggest shareholder, turned down a board seat, agreed to buy the social media platform and then started raising doubts about going through with the deal. The next chapter in the saga is almost certain to be a court battle.

A lawyer representing Musk claimed in a letter to Twitter's top lawyer that he is ending the deal because Twitter (TWTR) is "in material breach of multiple provisions" of the original agreement, which was signed in April, according to a regulatory filing Friday evening.
Click to expand...
"The Twitter Board is committed to closing the transaction on the price and terms agreed upon with Mr. Musk and plans to pursue legal action to enforce the merger agreement," Twitter board chair Bret Taylor said in a tweet Friday, echoing earlier statements by the company that it planned to follow through with the deal. "We are confident we will prevail in the Delaware Court of Chancery."
Click to expand...

But the story goes on to say that Twitter shares fell 5% on the news, while Tesla shares rose 1%.
 
Musk might be forced to complete the purchase or pay a hefty fine.

Under the terms of the agreement the company can ask a judge for “specific performance”, which would compel Musk to buy the company for the $54.20 a share he agreed to in April. Alternatively, the company can also seek a $1bn break fee from Musk for walking away from the deal in contravention of the agreement.

Quinn said Musk’s arguments would probably fail in court. In Friday’s letter, Musk put forward three broad arguments: that Twitter had breached the agreement by failing to provide enough information on spam accounts; that Twitter has misrepresented the number of spam accounts in its disclosures to the US financial watchdog; and that the company breached the agreement by failing to consult with Musk when firing senior employees recently.
Click to expand...
 
You have to wonder if the reason Musk wants out is he found out ever if buys it he won't be able to have total control like he does with his other companies,that the Tiwtter BOD will have the ultimate say, not Musk.
 
dudalb said:
You have to wonder if the reason Musk wants out is he found out ever if buys it he won't be able to have total control like he does with his other companies,that the Tiwtter BOD will have the ultimate say, not Musk.
Click to expand...

Nope. If he owns the company the board serves at his pleasure, as any board of directors serves at the pleasure of the majority of their stockholders.
 
angrysoba said:
Yep, but it seems that even if he pays the fee for breaking the contract it will almost certainly be cheaper than buying Twitter which is currently worth so many billions less than what he agreed to buy it for.
Click to expand...

Yeah. The billion-dollar fine is virtually irrelevant. He acted recklessly and regrets it because just tendering the offer resulted in a reduction of his net worth.
 
Babbylonian said:
Yeah. The billion-dollar fine is virtually irrelevant. He acted recklessly and regrets it because just tendering the offer resulted in a reduction of his net worth.
Click to expand...

I do get the sense that it was an impulsive decision, and one that he wishes he could undo.

Musk likes to talk a big game, but often fails to deliver.
 
Babbylonian said:
Yeah. The billion-dollar fine is virtually irrelevant. He acted recklessly and regrets it because just tendering the offer resulted in a reduction of his net worth.
Click to expand...

But also, backing out of the deal, while a lesser financial punishment could result in a bigger reputational loss, which frankly seems to be something he has been doing for a while now. I don't know if it is hubris or he thinks that behaving like some "maverick" is good for him, but he seems to act as if nothing he does or says has consequences beyond the share prices of various companies.

Also, another serious misjudgment of his seemed to be throwing in his lot with the Republicans. It may have "triggered the libs" to say he will now vote Republican because the Democrats are meanies, but judging by Trump's comments about Musk being a BS artist, he might have lost a large chunk of right-wing supporters as well. Whether or not Get woke, go broke is true, if you fellate the right, you end up a right sucker.
 
Please point to any consequences he has faced in the last ten years for things he does or says, other than an impact on his wealth that is relatively inconsequential.
 
Looks like Twitter might be getting serious…

52207780722_ef9bb8dbab.jpg
 
Dr. Keith said:
Please point to any consequences he has faced in the last ten years for things he does or says, other than an impact on his wealth that is relatively inconsequential.
Click to expand...

He has a gaggle of kids. Those are are both financially and emotionally impact. The man can't stop having kids.

Other than that, you're right though.
 
plague311 said:
He has a gaggle of kids. Those are are both financially and emotionally impact. The man can't stop having kids.

Other than that, you're right though.
Click to expand...

At his level of wealth having kids is less of a financial impact. As a percentage of wealth it is a bit like me having goldfish. Sure, there’s a cost but it doesn’t make a dent in my bottom line.

And where did you get the idea that he can feel emotions? I mean, other than being insulted or needing more attention.

//That sounds more confrontational than I intended. Sorry about that. Agreeing vehemently?///
 
Last edited:
Dr. Keith said:
Please point to any consequences he has faced in the last ten years for things he does or says, other than an impact on his wealth that is relatively inconsequential.
Click to expand...

plague311 said:
He has a gaggle of kids. Those are are both financially and emotionally impact. The man can't stop having kids.

Other than that, you're right though.
Click to expand...

Dr. Keith said:
At his level of wealth having kids is less of a financial impact. As a percentage of wealth it is a bit like me having goldfish. Sure, there’s a cost but it doesn’t make a dent in my bottom line.

And where did you get the idea that he can feel emotions? I mean, other than being insulted or needing more attention.

//That sounds more confrontational than I intended. Sorry about that. Agreeing vehemently?///
Click to expand...

Ha ha! You are not wrong. That said, I have to wonder if there is a point at which potential investors will start to wonder how much he can be trusted. Obviously Space X and Tesla allow him a lot of slack because of the achievements of these companies, but I think there is only so much damage you can do to your reputation before people start to wonder if he is a stable genius after all.
 
plague311 said:
He has a gaggle of kids. Those are are both financially and emotionally impact. The man can't stop having kids.
Click to expand...
He has four. Two from his first marriage, after losing one to SIDS, and two from his current marriage. That's hardly extreme - my own brother has the same.
 
To be fair, Elon Musk is being consistent here. He is always worried about the decline in births in the west and wants to do something to reverse it. So he is doing his part, I suppose. Still, it could be a little dangerous to have so many half-brothers and half-sisters running around in a decreasing gene pool. Accidents can happen.
 
And bonus points for triggering the libs, of course.

While right-wingers can wag their fingers at the poor for having children and broken homes, it is cool for the rich to do the same.
 
angrysoba said:
To be fair, Elon Musk is being consistent here. He is always worried about the decline in births in the west and wants to do something to reverse it. So he is doing his part, I suppose. Still, it could be a little dangerous to have so many half-brothers and half-sisters running around in a decreasing gene pool. Accidents can happen.
Click to expand...
Well, one of his kids has disowned him now, so we could say eight.
 
Elon Musk and the World’s Biggest Case of Buyer’s Remorse

The $1 billion breakup fee here is part of the April agreement between Musk and Twitter. But Musk can’t just pay a fee and walk away — it only applies if regulators scuttle the deal, which isn’t happening, or if there’s fraud or some other major problem.

The upshot here is that, whether or not Musk wants to wriggle out of the deal, there is a contract he signed that holds him to the terms he agreed to.
Click to expand...

Is that true? What counts as a "major problem"? He cannot merely decide to pay $1 billion to walk away from the deal?
 
Puppycow said:
Elon Musk and the World’s Biggest Case of Buyer’s Remorse



Is that true? What counts as a "major problem"? He cannot merely decide to pay $1 billion to walk away from the deal?
Click to expand...

an argument could be made that his actions and comments have tanked Twitter values so much that the only way to make the shareholders whole is for Musk to buy it at the price he offered, and not leave it at the price he tanked it to.

There is precedent, but it's shaky.
 
Yeah, I imagine that a class-action lawsuit against Musk is Plan B. But that’s for another day. For now, it’s taking him to court to enforce the contract. I don’t buy individual stocks but I am kind of interested in buying Twitter at the current price. After all, it’s discounted if Musk has to buy it at $54/share. But that’s all contingent on a legal outcome that I can’t say for sure is certain.
 
Economists would say that the current price of Twitter reflects the Market's opinion that Musk won't buy Twitter and no one else will do so either anytime soon.
 
With the 4 or 5 billion from a few months ago (remember the poll asking if he should sell a bit of Tesla?) and the 8 or 10b for the Twitter deal, he should now have a new 12 to 15 billion in actual, real, liquid money in the bank.
As I suspect this was the real reason behind the entire Twitter debacle (is any legal ramification potential for some of that "other problems" mentioned upthread)... does anyone have a reliable account of how much real "cash on hand" he had prior to all this?
Hundreds of billions in Tesla stock isn't that handy if its ridiculous (over)valuation is primarily because you (Elon) haven't sold any. Honestly, how bad do you imagine the terms would be to get any major lender to front you cash against Tesla stock?
And a mere 50 billion in lost value is not a bad deal if you now have 10b or more in real bucks to do as you please.

So, anyone... was he cash flush before? Or not.
 
Last edited:
What would be the point of being cash flush with billions, especially in times of high inflation?
It's not like it's possible to carry a billion around with you.
 
Well, predictably this is all going to court now...

Twitter has taken billionaire Elon Musk to court to try to force him to buy the social media firm, setting up a legal battle with the world's richest man.

It comes after Mr Musk announced he was walking away from his proposed $44bn acquisition of Twitter on Friday.

He claimed Twitter had not given information about the number of fake and spam accounts on the platform.

Now Twitter has asked a Delaware court to order Mr Musk to complete the merger at the agreed $54.20 per Twitter share.

"Having mounted a public spectacle to put Twitter in play, and having proposed and then signed a seller-friendly merger agreement, [Mr] Musk apparently believes that he - unlike every other party subject to Delaware contract law - is free to change his mind, trash the company, disrupt its operations, destroy stockholder value, and walk away," said the lawsuit.
Click to expand...

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-62144776
 
Puppycow said:
Is that true? What counts as a "major problem"? He cannot merely decide to pay $1 billion to walk away from the deal?
Click to expand...
As I seem to continually have to point out, Musk's (and other billionaires') wealth is not in the form of cash sitting around in big Scrooge McDuck style money bins. It's in assets, specifically the stock value of the companies he holds a majority share in. To simply pay $1billion, he would have to liquidate a non-trivial amount of that, and that's not something that you can just decide to do.
 
arthwollipot said:
As I seem to continually have to point out, Musk's (and other billionaires') wealth is not in the form of cash sitting around in big Scrooge McDuck style money bins. It's in assets, specifically the stock value of the companies he holds a majority share in. To simply pay $1billion, he would have to liquidate a non-trivial amount of that, and that's not something that you can just decide to do.
Click to expand...
That's why I mentioned the couple things I did...

Was he cash flush before? Honest question, and no I don't know if this economy effects whether he wants to be or not.
Second, was the Twitter kerfuffle a ruse to bank value from over valued Tesla stock he can't just sell without taking a stock price hit. See the two times he has sold chunks of his holding. He does hold a couple hundred billion in TSLA though so it might have been a smart move.
But... is doing so against the rules? Does he carry any legal responsibility for that overvaluation? Not taking value out is what kept what's her name from a lengthy prison stretch over the Theranos fallout. Is Elon at risk?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom