MarkCorrigan
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2008
- Messages
- 13,680
Doesn't explain anything, isn't an excuse and still doesn't answer the question.
Still no response then?
Doesn't explain anything, isn't an excuse and still doesn't answer the question.
If he turned the car into a hybrid, then he's responsible for the fire if, as you claim, it began with the battery.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
It's not mutually exclusive.
Yes it is.
Either the manufacturer ****** up with a ****** design or defect, or the guy had an aftermarket* or DIY EV conversion.
*did some googling and no one in the UK seems to offer such
Aw but did you check the dark net?
So Vixen's clutched-straw fantasy is that the car's owner converted it from a diesel to a diesel hybrid (though she can find no evidence at all showing anybody has ever done that, probably because it has literally never been done) and yet he did not tell the DVLA to request the car be reclassified to a lower CO2 emissions bracket to save on tax, nor tell his insurer that he had modified the car (almost certainly voiding his insurance). Then its hybrid battery caught fire, emitting burning shrapnel which somehow pierced the fuel tank at the opposite end of the car (although we await Vixen's evidence that burning EV batteries actually emit such shrapnel, capable of punching through something like a fuel tank).
Not even Vixen actually believes this is what happened. It's like a God of the gaps argument except you have to put your fingers in your ears and go la-la-la-la to maintain the fiction that some of the gaps even exist.
You know why. Fossil fuels good, EVs bad. When this fire was reported everybody said "This is the end for EVs. Nobody will ever touch one again after this disaster!" - and we would be rid of the evil things for good.If this really was some slipshod garage mechanic job that caused the fire, then why the coverup?
So it was an EV from the future sent back to destroy EVs before they can take over the world. Sent to 2014 when they didn't have an EV model, wearing a fake 'diesel' badge and a false moustache and biding its time for 9 years until it suddenly burned down a car park using its burning shrapnel and concrete melting abilities which all armchair detectives instantly recognized as signs and portents of lithium.
I believe there was a publicly consultable car registration directory in Belgium the best part of 100 years ago because it was a plot point in an early Tintin story. But it doesn’t exist now.
On the EV conversion front, I learned to drive in a Peugeot 205 back in the day and we’ve recently uncovered that very car in the back of a barn up in the mountains. We’re talking about a summer conversion project but we - including an uncle who used to run a garage and an uncle and a cousin who run a sizeable electricians business - are doing a lot of reading before taking a decision. It’s not exactly a weekend job using household tools.
Nice, I briefly had an RD350LC Mk1 with a Stan Stephens Stage 2 tune. Scary fast, also never caught fire (though it did seize a couple of times)Back in the early 80s I converted a Yamaha RD250 to a 400 by swapping the barrels, rods and pistons.
It was still badged as a 250 and that's what it said on the V5 but there was no way to tell without measuring things.
Fastest learner bike in the country lol
It never caught fire.
Nice, I briefly had an RD350LC Mk1 with a Stan Stephens Stage 2 tune. Scary fast, also never caught fire (though it did seize a couple of times)
Nice, I briefly had an RD350LC Mk1 with a Stan Stephens Stage 2 tune. Scary fast, also never caught fire (though it did seize a couple of times)
Home made conversions to pure EV are around (never seen or heard of a home made hybrid though- although it is 'technically' possible, its much harder than a pure ev conversion....
Pull the original ICE motor, and fit a electric motor in its place, fit batteries and controllers and done...
Never had an LC, just the air cooled, then passed my test and moved on to 'big' bikes.
Meaningless pseudo-science. Maybe even worse than that. Just drivel.
Why did you write "the burning vehicle"? That's clearly the ground floor and vehicle #0 was a few floors above. Directly above was also a raging inferno with hundreds of cars ablaze.
Vixen, do you really expect anyone to believe - no, do you really believe that a Li-ion battery in a car could melt through the floor of the garage so fast that you wouldn't see any molten concrete or steel dripping through before it could all come through? Do you think that a Li-ion battery fire is so intense that it would "melt" through the concrete floor in an instant, and that a fire that staggeringly hot would still leave a recognizable car to fall through?
The Daily Mail is written by and for idiots, so their headline is predictably sensationalized. "Moment Range Rover explodes" (they didn't even get the make right) sounds way more dramatic than "Moment span collapses due to massive, prolonged fire involving numerous cars".
And why do you keep ignoring the NHTSA study showing that Li-ion vehicle fires are, at worst, no more destructive than in gasoline or diesel vehicles? Is NHTSA part of the sinister plot? Did they fake that study six years ago at the behest of a foreign auto manufacturer?
Ah, this twitter guy has 8,000 or so followers. So, we know that videos posted by someone with 8,000 followers are trustworthy, while those with only 232 followers are unreliable.
How many followers are enough to make video tweets reliable exactly? Or is the blue check mark the mark of integrity?
Right, it's not mutually exclusive.
But let's go with the working hypothesis that the prime minister (or maybe someone even higher up) wants to deflect blame from Land Rover. That's why, after all, you said the arrest was made, to distract attention away from the manufacturer.
Why would you publicly claim that the fire was a result of vehicle fault on the same day? Why not just remain silent on that point? If you're trying to avoid attention on the manufacturer, mentioning vehicle fault is a poor strategy.
Are these people just stupid? They announced the arrest like the higher-ups ordered, but they forgot to strike mention of vehicle fault from the press conference notes?
Your theory makes little sense.
Different buildings, different situations, fires can behave differently. Were I a fire expert, perhaps I could see something suspicious in these different rates of spread or perhaps not. But like you, I don't know much about fires. Unlike you, I don't expect every parking garage fire started by an ICE car to spread at exactly the same rate.
The Luton Airport ard park fire began in a 2013 diesel Range Rover. No lithium batteries needed.
Why do you think Vixen posted a screenshot instead of a link?
Just to re-iterate what the likes of Catsmate have already said: this is utter nonsense, totally not true and in no way a reflection of how the UK public sector deals with personal information (veteran of many years of public sector IG training here, who lives with someone who's done even more of it, both of whom have used their knowledge to hit lax organisations over the head and change their practice).
Still no response then?
Your name and address is in the public domain.
But the link to your car registration isn't.
I was post 125cc limit so it was a 'big bike' for me (insurance costs kept me on lower capacity bikes for years).
Your name and address is in the public domain. People can look up your address on the Electoral Register, which is also available online. People can also subscribe to 191 and look up anybody's address. People can look up your birth and marriage certificates, and other personal details from the Public Records Office. The owner of your property can be found on the Land Registry by anybody. You can opt out of your details being visible on the Electoral Register and you can ask the Preferential Mailing lists to take your name and address off their 'marketing spam' lists. None of this breaks the DPA.
I would not be surprised if anyone can apply to DVLA through the correct means to identify a vehicle should you have good reason, such as a hit and miss or damage to your property. Insurers have a way of identifying the other driver.
It is nonsense to claim that it is a national security risk and a breach of law for this information to be public. It is probably not online but through special application because there is no centralised database to cope with idle internet surfing.
His video was used by the worldwide press, including BBC, ITV, APF and Reuters. He confirmed it was his original and he has the copyright. Unlike the guy who claims to have the film from the front of the vehicle and the person who claims to have deciphered the number plate and identified the make and model. Learn to spot fake from authentic.
They are just giving you bland platitudes. Within hours a fire fighter told a journalist it was probably a fuel line leak (just like the one in Liverpool). Learn to differentiate considered speculation from confirmed fact.
It is clear the brand is being protected for now or it would have been named.
It is only speculation it was a Range Rover. Some say it is a Tesla from its outline.
Here we have someone who believes in obviously fake news and has the temerity to claim they have 'drivel' detectors.
Your name and address is in the public domain. People can look up your address on the Electoral Register, which is also available online. People can also subscribe to 191 and look up anybody's address. People can look up your birth and marriage certificates, and other personal details from the Public Records Office. The owner of your property can be found on the Land Registry by anybody. You can opt out of your details being visible on the Electoral Register and you can ask the Preferential Mailing lists to take your name and address off their 'marketing spam' lists. None of this breaks the DPA.
I would not be surprised if anyone can apply to DVLA through the correct means to identify a vehicle should you have good reason, such as a hit and miss or damage to your property. Insurers have a way of identifying the other driver.
It is nonsense to claim that it is a national security risk and a breach of law for this information to be public. It is probably not online but through special application because there is no centralised database to cope with idle internet surfing.
As I pointed out, this has nothing to do with 'national security'.
Here you can ring up the national population centre and ask for anybody's address. When I worked in insolvency practice we had no problem in finding people and discovering what assets they owned via Land Registry and it was all quite legal.
As I pointed out, this has nothing to do with 'national security'.
Here you can ring up the national population centre and ask for anybody's address. When I worked in insolvency practice we had no problem in finding people and discovering what assets they owned via Land Registry and it was all quite legal.