• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories
  • You may need to edit your signatures.

    When we moved to Xenfora some of the signature options didn't come over. In the old software signatures were limited by a character limit, on Xenfora there are more options and there is a character number and number of lines limit. I've set maximum number of lines to 4 and unlimited characters.

Cont: Luton Airport Car Park Fire part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
phiwum said:
Seems to me that if this vehicle isn't the initial vehicle, then TWO cars caught fire all by themselves in the same car park at roughly the same time, one a diesel and the other with a lithium battery. Or is there some other way that the fire from the diesel could have indirectly set the SUV in the video on fire?
Click to expand...

Hear me out: Combustible quantum entangled particles
 
Obviously when the EV caught fire (first), PM Sunak—who has CCTV of all car parks in the UK fed into 10 Downing Street—sent MI-5 operatives to set fire to a diesel vehicle to draw away suspicion. Then Miss Moneyjenny from Communications doctored all the press releases.
 
EHocking said:
That and her class bigotry.
Which she believes is normal.
hmmm, not just class bigotry it seems…
Click to expand...

No 'class bigotry'. It should have been apparent and my apologies if it was not, that the reference to the 'working class' was shorthand for the UKIP-voting, anti-EV, anti-ULEZ, anti-boats Brexit flag-waving mob, usually associated with this type of issue (EV fires). That should have been clear from the context. It should not be necessary to have to quote AJP Taylor, EP Thompson, Marx Engels, Hegel or Gramsci to fully agree that the working classes are the salt of the earth. The people who put food on your table, clothes on your back, build your houses and cars, serve you in shops, deliver your babies, install and fix your plumbing; in fact do almost all of the productive work.
 
My Lords, Ladies and Gentlemen and the rest of you oinks. Please remember the topic of this thread which to give you a clue isn't Vixen. So please get back on topic and start discussing the fire that occurred in a diesel vehicle in a Luton Airport carpark.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat
 
My Lords, Ladies and Gentlemen and the rest of you oinks. Please remember the topic of this thread which to give you a clue isn't Vixen. So please get back on topic and start discussing the fire that occurred in a diesel vehicle in a Luton Airport carpark.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat
 
zooterkin said:
Once again, it's a blind trust that was registered, not a 'blind register'. You'd think an accountant would understand the terminology.

And, to your point, no, it's not a fact, as usual you're talking bollocks. Just one counter example:
Click to expand...

OK fair enough. I likely misread the article when it said 'other prime ministers such as Johnson and Cameron' hadn't done this to read as 'all other prime ministers'. Johnson only owned up a blind trust in retrospect when he became obliged to explain how and who paid for his wallpaper and it turned out to be some 'donors' or other. Lord Geidt cleared Johnson of any impropriety.

Sunak's business interests go far deeper than Johnson's wallpaper and holiday villas or Russian yachts moored off the coast of Scotland whilst pretending to be camping in a tent. As with Theresa May, the idea of simply passing one's interest over to your spouse is not removing yourself from conflict of interest at all in my view. Philip and Akshata in the meantime are controlling the business interests of their spouses which ipso facto are also their interests.

Suank had no problem in his wife benefiting from childcare policies that he implemented and there is a strong suggestion he bought Moderna shares whilst acting as Chancellor of the Exchequer during the Covid Vaccine crisis. Given Sunak's clear penchant for non-declaration he almost certainly will profit greatly from the presence of Tata in the UK, thanks to his wife's contacts, including her mother who was a Tata employee and her father a close friend.
 


I'm not following this thread so was struggling to work out the relevance of many of the posts to the purported topic of this thread, so removed most of the ones since Darat's modbox.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: jimbob
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom