So what
A commentator has some comments on the assassination:
By
Jacob G. Hornberger
Edited by zooterkin:
<Snip> for rule 4.
Ah, a comedian.
So, what was going on here? Why did the CIA fight so fiercely for so long to cover all this up?
Let's work backwards...
There is no way around it, not even for the U.S. mainstream press, which, needless to say, continues hewing to the ludicrous lone-nut theory of the assassination.
This is lie. The mainstream press has been continuing the scam of a conspiracy and multiple shooters in Dealey Plaza, and Oswald not being one of them.
Why did the CIA fight so fiercely for so long to cover all this up? Because the last thing the CIA wanted was for people to find out its role in setting up Oswald to take the fall for the assassination.
Why would the CIA set up one of their own guys? More importantly, why wasn't the CIA paying Oswald if he was one of their guys, so he wouldn't have to work in a warehouse?
Knowing the deeply seated Cold War fear of communists and communism that had been inculcated in the American people, the national-security state knew that the best thing it could ever do was to frame a “communist.”
So he knows nothing the communist threat, and the very real body-count of the Soviet Union, Cuba, PRC, and at the time North Vietnam.
h, but it gets worse. During the HSCA investigation, the CIA called Joannides out of retirement to ostensibly serve as an innocent, good-faith liaison between committee investigators and the CIA. In reality, he served as an obstacle to the investigation of the CIA’s possible role in the JFK assassination. Moreover, the CIA never revealed Joannides’ role in the DRE to the HSCA or, for that matter, to the ARRB.
Golly, so he hasn't read any of the assassination documents. If you had you'd know Joannides gave away the store to the HSCA re: Cuba.
Two months after Oswald moved to New Orleans, in June 1963, while Oswald was still in New Orleans, Kennedy delivered his famous Peace Speech at American University, which essentially was a declaration of war against the national-security branch of the federal government. In that speech, JFK effectively declared an end to the Cold War and an intent to move America in a totally different direction — one that was based on establishing peaceful and friendly relations with Russia, Cuba, and the communist world. That, of course, was anathema to the U.S. national security establishment. JFK’s Peace Speech undoubtedly solidified the decision to remove JFK from office.
JFK said one thing, but the archives demonstrate he was full steam ahead on the Cold War. His speech was optimistic, but he also is clear the US is not going to back down in the face of the evil that was (and is) communism. And you can read the full speech here:
Four months after JFK’s Peace Speech, in September 1963 Oswald went to Mexico City, where he engaged in a big public hullabaloo in which he made contact with the Soviet and Cuban embassies. For those who are still convinced that the Russians or Cubans employed Oswald to assassinate Kennedy, it’s worth asking: If that’s really true, would they really want to advertise their connection to the assassin in such a big way?
Here's something you need to get your head around: Oswald didn't work for anybody. The Russians knew he was a sad-sack loser, the Cubans didn't want to waste time with him because he was a flake, and CIA doesn't hire dorks like Oswald. And if the plan was to frame Oswald, why didn't the CIA Mexico City Station take tons of photos of him at both embassies, keep the recordings of his conversations (which the records show they'd wired both buildings for sound), and why didn't they follow him to that party at Silvia Duran's apartment that was loaded with KGB guys to take more pictures?
Does he not know how frame jobs work?
While in New Orleans, Oswald went to work for the Reily Coffee Company, which was owned by a fierce anti-communist conservative. What are the chances that a fierce anti-communist conservative would hire a died-in-the-wool communist at the height of the Cold War? No chance at all!
He worked there three months as a "greaser" maintaining machinery, and was fired because...he was a slacker. It's New Orleans, back then if an applicant was not a convicted felon, homosexual, and WHITE they'd get the job. Hardly a smoking gun.
But there was one significant thing that people didn’t know: The DRE was being supervised and generously funded by the CIA, specifically by CIA official George Joannides. For all practical purposes, the DRE was one of the CIA’s infamous front organizations.
Funded? Yes. Supervised? LMAO, not really. And it's not like they had a huge bankroll. He really should actually read the files some time.
In October 1962, President Kennedy settled the Cuban Missile Crisis, in which he promised that the U.S. would not invade Cuba. This was almost certainly the point at which the national-security establishment decided that Kennedy posed a grave threat to national security and needed to be removed from office, given the Pentagon’s and CIA’s conviction that the Cuban communist regime posed a grave threat to U.S. national security.
And yet JFK's NSC continued with it's anti-Cuban operations unabated. He leaves out the part where JFK's actions against Castro led to the Cuban Missile Crisis, but that's par for the course.
As the years and decades passed, it became increasingly clear that Oswald, who served in the U.S. Marines, was recruited to be an operative for U.S. intelligence, one who was trained to work under the cover of being a communist. That would explain why Oswald was not subjected to arrest, torture, indictment, prosecution, or even just an interrogation after he ostensibly defected to the Soviet Union and then returned to the United States with a Russian wife.
Well...that's in the files too. Oswald was in idiot, something the DIA and FBI had determined after he'd defected, and something the Soviets knew right out of the gate as they didn't want him, and only allowed his defection because he attempted suicide.
Oh, and Oswald was 17 when he joined the USMC. He was court-martialed twice, and did time in the brig. He was 19 when he defected to the Soviet Union. It takes about year to train as a CIA officer, and no point was LHO at Camp Perry, or their place in the Adirondacks, or the Sierra Nevadas. So when did he have time to train with the CIA? Air Traffic Control School was eight months, and USMC basic training was four months. Seriously, is this guy familiar with how calendar works?
The release of the Joannides records was reported this past Friday on Axios in an article entitled “
CIA Admits Shadowy Officer Monitored Oswald Before JFK Assassination, New Records Reveal” by Marc Cavuto. It’s worth taking a pause in reading my article and going over to read Cavuto’s article to get an overall context of these particular long-secret records that have just been released.
Cool, this guy probably should have read all of them. And Axios sucks as a source. They link to a "damning" document about a CIA officer getting a fake D.C. driver's license, as if this is unusual:
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/MEMO FOR SPECIAL AGENT IN[16503918].pdf
They're really going to flip out when they find the CIA fakes a lot of documents.
It is circumstantial evidence, such as the fraudulent autopsy that the U.S. military establishment carried out on President Kennedy’s body
You mean the one where Jackie Kennedy picked the autopsy location, and where RFK was present in the gallery above the entire time? That fake autopsy?
or the fraudulent copy of the Zapruder film that the CIA produced on the weekend of the assassination,
That's a new one. Comedy gold. Here's the problem; the chain of evidence for the Zapruder Film is air-tight. And it matches up with all four films of the assassination. And why film it at all? What kind of hit team doesn't control the target area? How hard would it have been to have "fake" Secret Service Agents tell people to put their cameras away? Why not destroy the film before it is turned over to the FBI, and why not arrange for it to be lost in the confusion?
Thanks to the release of the Joannides files, we now have more smoking-gun circumstantial evidence to add on top of the circumstantial evidence establishing the fraudulent autopsy and the fraudulent film.
No. The new files were mostly MLK Jr files. And none of the recently declassified files cover the autopsy nor the Zapruder Film. So what are he even talking about?
So, what was going on here? Why did the CIA fight so fiercely for so long to cover all this up?
Because JMWAVE was a big operation, and Cuba is a hostile nation, and leftist busy-bodies never figured that out. JMWAVE had nothing to do with the assassination because it was a JFK operation.
