Hmmm, I get it, I really do, but I don't like it. I'd have preferred they carried on fighting through the courts... it's not like they can't afford decent lawyers. And if they lost and he ended up imprisoned, hope the next president after Trump did the decent thing.
Yes what Biden did seems perfectly legal and yes you can't blame a father for doing it, but there's obviously a conflict of interest here and power should not be able to be wielded when there's such a conflict of interest. Biden did the right thing initially by recusing himself from any involvement.
And it's no good screaming that Trump is worse...
he obviously is but the average Joe will not see that distinction. This will just become, 'they all do it' and as I understand it, he did do the crime and, whilst he may be punished to a more severe degree than the usual, the same could be applied to other people committing the same crime... it just usually isn't. So, yeah, they've made an example of him because of who he is, but making an example of someone by applying the maximum penalty is not unheard of nor wrong per se. Their motives in doing so are clearly politically oriented but again, afaik, they are merely pursuing him to the full extent of the law. ◊◊◊◊ that they chose to do so, but then he shouldn't have committed the crime(s).
Puts hard hat on and prepares for incoming....