How do we know a pandemic's over?
- Thread starter Chanakya
- Start date
marting
Illuminator
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
- Messages
- 4,249
Yeah, no doubt about that. Early on Covid Vaxes had a pretty good uptake while Flu vax update has remained fairly steady. Covid Vax rates are pitiful so pretty much depends on long term, memory cell protection which, lucky for us, is reasonably good. That and fairly high population immunity from both vax and survivor immunity (the phrase natural immunity seems to imply "good" for some) has taken a big bite out of the Covid threat. This new variant could make for another large wave this summer like last year's. Probably not going to have much effect on San Diego's 2024/25 fiscal year reporting as it closes out at the end of June.
I think it has already closed:
Last edited:
Australia:
Denis - The COVID info guy on X, May 30, 2025
COVID-19 outbreaks in Australian residential aged care facilities: 29 May 2025
Active cases: 1,218 (+54.5%
Active outbreaks: 173 (+47.8%)
Residents: 903 (+55.6%)
Staff: 315 (+51.4%)
Reported deaths in 2025: 157* (+6)
@Mark_Butler_MP
https://health.gov.au/resources/publications/covid-19-outbreaks-in-australian-residential-aged-care-homes-30-may-2025?language=en
I hope they're right:
JWeiland on X, May 30, 2025
From viral evolution alone, I think you're correct here Ryan! One other factor for consideration is the build up of susceptables during the last 8 months of low/very low in a lot of states (nothing at all from XEC or LP)- a possible mini powder keg looking for a match.
marting
Illuminator
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
- Messages
- 4,249
It hasn't closed. The reports are monthly instead of weekly until Oct. Been that way for several months. Should get the next report this coming week.
This one is sooo 2020 if it weren't for the cough that dare not speak its name:
Some countries still seem to be concerned about the health of their populations:
And that is despite the economy of Turks and Caicos being very dependent on the tourist industry.
HHS.gov on X, May 30, 2025
@NYTimes, @WashingtonPost, @Politico got it wrong again. The COVID-19 vaccine schedule is very clear. The vaccine is not recommended for pregnant women. The vaccine is not recommended for healthy children. Any decision by a parent to vaccinate their child outside the CDC recommended schedule should be made in consultation with their healthcare provider.
Chanakya
,
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 5,592
Okay, this is anecdotal, and what's more an anecdotal reference to one man's opinion, but still:
I happened to be talking to a friend --- well, more acquaintance than friend, but whatever --- who's a doctor, and who seemed very knowledgeable about this recent escalation in infection numbers. And he tells me that these are a bunch of variations of the Omicron strain, which, like their parent the Omicron, are highly infective, hence the uptick in infection numbers; but, again like their forebear the Omicron, not very ...harmful, compared to other strains, that is to say not lethal generally. So that this uptick isn't really a matter for worry, in and of itself.
However, people in those geographies that do see an uptick, would be well advised to mask, and when ill to isolate etc, not so much for their own safety, but to generally keep down infection rates --- because the more the proliferation, the greater the chances of new mutations; and the greater the number of mutations, the higher the possibility that one or more of these might end up being harmful, lethal, in new ways.
So yeah, that was his (apparently well-informed) take on this. That despite the uptick there's no reason to panic; but in general terms it makes sense to do what we can to keep numbers down.
While I'm not independently sure if he's right, but he did seem to make sense. (Well, provided he's right about his facts, and not just gassing away. It is partly to share this here generally, and partly to lean on the knowledge and expertise of people here, to make sure he's indeed making sense, that I'm mentioning this now.)
I happened to be talking to a friend --- well, more acquaintance than friend, but whatever --- who's a doctor, and who seemed very knowledgeable about this recent escalation in infection numbers. And he tells me that these are a bunch of variations of the Omicron strain, which, like their parent the Omicron, are highly infective, hence the uptick in infection numbers; but, again like their forebear the Omicron, not very ...harmful, compared to other strains, that is to say not lethal generally. So that this uptick isn't really a matter for worry, in and of itself.
However, people in those geographies that do see an uptick, would be well advised to mask, and when ill to isolate etc, not so much for their own safety, but to generally keep down infection rates --- because the more the proliferation, the greater the chances of new mutations; and the greater the number of mutations, the higher the possibility that one or more of these might end up being harmful, lethal, in new ways.
So yeah, that was his (apparently well-informed) take on this. That despite the uptick there's no reason to panic; but in general terms it makes sense to do what we can to keep numbers down.
While I'm not independently sure if he's right, but he did seem to make sense. (Well, provided he's right about his facts, and not just gassing away. It is partly to share this here generally, and partly to lean on the knowledge and expertise of people here, to make sure he's indeed making sense, that I'm mentioning this now.)
I have a problem with this:
"but, again like their forebear the Omicron, not very ...harmful, compared to other strains, that is to say not lethal generally."
COVID-19 was never "lethal generally." The vast majority of people who got infected survived. And the vast majority of survivors seemed to get over it without much harm done. That was the case even before the vaccinations.
However, "not very ...harmful, compared to other strains," was never true. IIRC, Omicron virulence was estimated to be about 80% of the previous strains, which I wouldn't call not very harmful in comparison. And that the point was when everybody started calling it mild. Vaccinations had started during Delta and before Omicron, which made it a bit harder to estimate the difference in virus virulence. So did the level of immunity that some some people had from previous C19 infections.
However, since Omicron (like Delta before it, but more so) was more contagious, which - in combination with the post-vaccination let-it-rip policy - meant that in some places, e.g. Denmark, Omicron managed to kill more people than previous variants - in spite of allegedly being mild and in spite of vaccinations and in spite of 'hybrid immunity'.
Daily new confirmed COVID-19 deaths per million people (Our World in Data)
(For comparison, I would have added Cuba where the big killer variant was Delta, which arrived pre-vax in the summer of 2021 in that country, but Our World in Data gives Denmark and Cuba the same color, which is confusing.)
Notice the big spike in the winter of 2021-22. That's Omicron. Post-vax! At that point, the majority of Danes had had three shots. Two in the spring/summer of 2021 and one in October-November.
Notice also the summers 2020, 2021 and 2022. The summers were restriction-free in Denmark. And yet the summer of 2022 was far worse than the two previous summers even though it was all supposed to be over.
In the 2024-25 flu season, which was a pretty rough season for flu, C19 still killed more people than the flu. And the sequelae from C19 are far worse.
I don't think your doctor acquaintance is "just gassing away," but don't expect MDs to always be well-informed about this stuff. In the summer of 2022 when I pointed out to doctors and nurses how bad the situation was in comparison to the two previous years, they rarely believed me and sometimes asked me to prove it. They were much like everybody else in this respect. They believed what they had been told by the media: Covid was now mild and nothing to be concerned about. And we now had super (= hybrid) immunity. Even when I showed them the numbers and the graphs, many of them tended to think that Our World in Data must have got it wrong.
That is, unless they happened to work at a ward full of C19 patients.
"but, again like their forebear the Omicron, not very ...harmful, compared to other strains, that is to say not lethal generally."
COVID-19 was never "lethal generally." The vast majority of people who got infected survived. And the vast majority of survivors seemed to get over it without much harm done. That was the case even before the vaccinations.
However, "not very ...harmful, compared to other strains," was never true. IIRC, Omicron virulence was estimated to be about 80% of the previous strains, which I wouldn't call not very harmful in comparison. And that the point was when everybody started calling it mild. Vaccinations had started during Delta and before Omicron, which made it a bit harder to estimate the difference in virus virulence. So did the level of immunity that some some people had from previous C19 infections.
However, since Omicron (like Delta before it, but more so) was more contagious, which - in combination with the post-vaccination let-it-rip policy - meant that in some places, e.g. Denmark, Omicron managed to kill more people than previous variants - in spite of allegedly being mild and in spite of vaccinations and in spite of 'hybrid immunity'.
Daily new confirmed COVID-19 deaths per million people (Our World in Data)
(For comparison, I would have added Cuba where the big killer variant was Delta, which arrived pre-vax in the summer of 2021 in that country, but Our World in Data gives Denmark and Cuba the same color, which is confusing.)
Notice the big spike in the winter of 2021-22. That's Omicron. Post-vax! At that point, the majority of Danes had had three shots. Two in the spring/summer of 2021 and one in October-November.
Notice also the summers 2020, 2021 and 2022. The summers were restriction-free in Denmark. And yet the summer of 2022 was far worse than the two previous summers even though it was all supposed to be over.
In the 2024-25 flu season, which was a pretty rough season for flu, C19 still killed more people than the flu. And the sequelae from C19 are far worse.
I don't think your doctor acquaintance is "just gassing away," but don't expect MDs to always be well-informed about this stuff. In the summer of 2022 when I pointed out to doctors and nurses how bad the situation was in comparison to the two previous years, they rarely believed me and sometimes asked me to prove it. They were much like everybody else in this respect. They believed what they had been told by the media: Covid was now mild and nothing to be concerned about. And we now had super (= hybrid) immunity. Even when I showed them the numbers and the graphs, many of them tended to think that Our World in Data must have got it wrong.
That is, unless they happened to work at a ward full of C19 patients.
India:
COVID-19 resurgence: India notices five-fold increase in cases; experts warn of high transmissibility of new variant NB.1.8.1 (India Times, May 31, 2025)
COVID-19 resurgence: India notices five-fold increase in cases; experts warn of high transmissibility of new variant NB.1.8.1 (India Times, May 31, 2025)
Roger Ramjets
Philosopher
It was the same here in New Zealand. We easily squashed the original variant, but couldn't quite manage to eradicate Delta because it was too infectious for the level of compliance achievable. Therefore we had no hope of stopping omicron. Luckily by that time enough people had been vaccinated that we could risk 'letting it rip' (not that we had much choice). Then we went from zero deaths to thousands. But our cumulative death rate is still only 1/5th that of the US, suggesting that vaccinations really do work. I hate to think what would have happened if we weren't vaccinated.
BTW after thinking yesterday that maybe it's finally over, I just checked the wastewater count today and was only mildly surprised to see a big spike, up to the same level it was in November 2022 just before the third big surge. Not over!
However I expect deaths will stay low here because 70% of reported cases are now reinfections. If they survived it once they probably will again. As to long term damage, it may be decades before we can evaluate the eventual effect on lifespans. If a person dies 10-20 years before they otherwise would it should be counted as a premature death, but probably won't be.
When I look at Our World in Data, I get the impression that New Zealand was actually pretty good at eradicating even Delta.
Here in comparison with Cuba where the same approach was attempted but didn't succeed. The country managed well until it was inundated by Delta in the summer of 2021, almost entirely unvaccinated at the time. NZ succeeded!
Daily new confirmed COVID-19 deaths per million people (
, 
)
On the other hand, once its vaccination campaign was over by the end of 2021, Cuba tackled Omicron far better than almost all other countries. (I say almost because I don't know of any other country that did better.) In Cuba, Omicron was just a little bump in the road in Jan-Feb 2022.
New Zealand, on the other hand, was hit hard by Omicron in early 2022, post-
, when the eradication strategy was abandoned. In fact, Omicron's impact on New Zealand looks much like what we experienced in Denmark post- when all other precautions were abandoned.
Cumulative confirmed COVID-19 deaths per million people (, , 
)
In August '22, NZ had come up with an alternative way of counting C19 deaths, so the graph no longer reflects how the countries were actually doing after that date. It was NZ's way of 'flattening the curve'.
You should consider this difference whenever you make comparisons with other countries after Aug '22.
Here in comparison with Cuba where the same approach was attempted but didn't succeed. The country managed well until it was inundated by Delta in the summer of 2021, almost entirely unvaccinated at the time. NZ succeeded!
Daily new confirmed COVID-19 deaths per million people (
, )On the other hand, once its vaccination campaign was over by the end of 2021, Cuba tackled Omicron far better than almost all other countries. (I say almost because I don't know of any other country that did better.) In Cuba, Omicron was just a little bump in the road in Jan-Feb 2022.
New Zealand, on the other hand, was hit hard by Omicron in early 2022, post-
, when the eradication strategy was abandoned. In fact, Omicron's impact on New Zealand looks much like what we experienced in Denmark post- when all other precautions were abandoned.Cumulative confirmed COVID-19 deaths per million people (
, , )In August '22, NZ had come up with an alternative way of counting C19 deaths, so the graph no longer reflects how the countries were actually doing after that date. It was NZ's way of 'flattening the curve'.
You should consider this difference whenever you make comparisons with other countries after Aug '22.
Chanakya
,
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 5,592
Right, that sanity check is what I was looking for.
Specifically this, for instance, where you say: "in some places, e.g. Denmark, Omicron managed to kill more people than previous variants - in spite of allegedly being mild and in spite of vaccinations and in spite of 'hybrid immunity'"
So yeah, then while what Dr. G so impassionedly explained to me, while maybe it's not fully wrong as far as the background facts, but it seems off as far as the conclusion he draws from it. Of course, he does suggest taking precautions, but not so much to protect ourselves in the here and now but to prevent further mutations in future. And in his complacency about the immediate risk represented by this uptick in numbers, he seems to be wrong. I'm going with that.
More NZ, but I haven't found any confirmation:
This one is two months old:
Too many catching Covid-19 in hospital, experts say - but precautions being rolled back (RNZ.nz, Mar 26, 2025)
ETA:
I guess this is a kind of confirmation:
Amanda Kvalsvig: "Epidemiologist in the Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington @OtagoWellington Aotearoa New Zealand, all views my own, she/her."
She retweeted Elizabeth Black's tweet:
Interview with Amanda Kvalsvig:
This one is two months old:
Too many catching Covid-19 in hospital, experts say - but precautions being rolled back (RNZ.nz, Mar 26, 2025)
ETA:
I guess this is a kind of confirmation:
Amanda Kvalsvig: "Epidemiologist in the Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington @OtagoWellington Aotearoa New Zealand, all views my own, she/her."
She retweeted Elizabeth Black's tweet:
It is a reference to this retweet:
Denis - the COVID info guy on X, May 29, 2025
COVID-19 outbreaks in Australian residential aged care facilities: 29 May 2025
Active cases: 1,218 (+54.5%)
Active outbreaks: 173 (+47.8%)
Residents: 903 (+55.6%)
Staff: 315 (+51.4%)
Reported deaths in 2025: 157* (+6)
COVID-19 outbreaks in Australian residential aged care homes โ 30 May 2025
Interview with Amanda Kvalsvig:
Last edited:
India:
Reported is important in this context. I have no idea what is considered to be a C19 death in India. 26 deaths this year is far less than in Denmark. Populations:
1.4 billion; 6 million. I also don't know when (and why) people there get tested, which is important for the interpretation of the "rise over 1,200%": Does it reflect that an increased number of people are being tested? Did the criteria for getting tested change? I have no idea.
Like everywhere else, the main message in this article is: "Nothing To Worry About"
India's Covid Cases Rise Over 1,200% In A Week. What's Driving The Surge (NDTV, June 1, 2025)
According to the data available on the official website of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, there are 3,395 active Coronavirus cases in the country as of Saturday morning, a rise of about 1,200 per cent from last week. India had 257 active cases on May 22 and 1,010 by May 26.
(,,,)
The data also showed that India has reported 26 deaths this year.
Reported is important in this context. I have no idea what is considered to be a C19 death in India. 26 deaths this year is far less than in Denmark. Populations:
1.4 billion; 6 million. I also don't know when (and why) people there get tested, which is important for the interpretation of the "rise over 1,200%": Does it reflect that an increased number of people are being tested? Did the criteria for getting tested change? I have no idea.Like everywhere else, the main message in this article is: "Nothing To Worry About"
Last edited:
I linked to the TODAY Show's article in post 1,364. Mike Hoerger and others point out that the article not only mentions N95s specifically, not masking up in general, but it also doesn't recommend washing your hands, which is useless when you are dealing with an airborne virus.
Mike Hoerger on X, May 31, 2025
The TODAY Show recommends N95s, vaccines, and frequent testing to dodge the potentially forthcoming NB.1.8.1 summer wave.
The U.S. government recommends against vaccines for children and pregnant people.
The beginning of a thread:
Charlos on X, June 1, 2025
So many replies from people developing #LongCovid in the last year from repeat infections.
This will keep happening !!!
USA - disability claims:
It's correlation, obviously, but ...
It's correlation, obviously, but ...
Jammer on X, June 2, 2025
โAlong with a baffling rise in excess mortality, Americans claiming disabilities have skyrocketed since 2020 (nearly 35%).โ - U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
โReasons behind the stunning increase vary, but many seem connected to COVID. A sizable number have LongCOVID.โ
Chanakya
,
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 5,592
Yeah, this Long Covid thing is a bitch! I don't remember which thread, it may have been this one, or the other one on Covid, or maybe the one in which @icerat spoke at some length about his own Long Covid symptoms: but I do remember briefly mentioning my cousin, who, following an intense bout of Covid, and despite apparently recovering from it, ended up with a whole bunch of weird symptoms. Went from being a perfectly healthy young guy to having a bunch of old-man symptoms that, hell, even his father (my uncle, who's a healthy enough guy, knock on wood) doesn't suffer from. Blood pressure, blood sugar, going completely bald, weird things going wrong with one of his eyes, weird things happening with his skin. Most conspicuously of all, going from being actually a very healthy and personable young man to becoming hugely obese.
Well, it's been years now, and he's still suffering from all of those. Just the other touched base with him. They say it's Long Covid, but of course, no one can be 100% sure about that, and nor can you treat those different symptoms other than one symptom at a time.
Well, it's been years now, and he's still suffering from all of those. Just the other touched base with him. They say it's Long Covid, but of course, no one can be 100% sure about that, and nor can you treat those different symptoms other than one symptom at a time.
Last edited:
That was in the science and medicine thread.
I don't know if that was also where you mentioned your cousin, but I think it would be more likely.
Going bald and skin conditions are some of the PASC symptoms that are rarely mentioned. They don't kill you and they don't usually affect your ability to work, but much like another one of the sequelae, impotence, they do affect your quality of life.
Did you see my post about Laura Loomer in the Conspiracy subforum?
I would hate to get Long Covid, obviously, but I would hate it so much more if I had been claiming that C19 was no big deal and even wishing that I would get it. In that case, 'living with (Long) Covid' seems to require a level of cognitive dissonance beyond ordinary (in)sanity.
Netherlands:
LowCovid Kane on X, June 2, 2025
#SARSCoV2 in wastewater the Hague (Houtrust) at high level 500 e+11 copies /100k inhabitants during the upcoming Corona Summer Wave in South-Holland:
Chanakya
,
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 5,592
Hadn't seen that post, no. Don't read that thread much (or maybe not at all, don't remember which).
Checked out the post just now. I would have smiled at a Covid denier coming down with that, except that sort of thing's horrible, even if the one getting it is a nutjob and invited it, so to say, by refusing vaccines.
Incidentally, my cousin's case, I don't remember 100%, but I think that was before the vaccines.
And yes, even if none of these symptoms are life-threatening, but they're a very big deal still. They would be, to anyone, but particularly when you're young.
Marty Makary! From a Face the Nation video (8:58 min.).
Without saying it directly, his main point is that "young healthy kids" shouldn't get the vaccine.
The journalist is great:
She also confronts his claim about vaccinating pregnant women.
In the comments on X, MAHA morons accuse her of being a pharma shill!
The correction of NOT --> now in the quotation is mine. I have no idea what he means when he says that the new variant is going to become the fifth coronavirus.
Without saying it directly, his main point is that "young healthy kids" shouldn't get the vaccine.
So he isn't talking about bringing back people's confidence in the vaccines, on the contrary. And he is using the mistrust that he, RFK Jr., Vinay Prasad, Jay Bhattacharya etc. have created - 88 percent of parents didn't want their kids to get the booster shots in the previous season - as his argument against the vaccines.
The journalist is great:
So much for Makary's "young healthy kids"!
She also confronts his claim about vaccinating pregnant women.
In the comments on X, MAHA morons accuse her of being a pharma shill!
The correction of NOT --> now in the quotation is mine. I have no idea what he means when he says that the new variant is going to become the fifth coronavirus.
Last edited:
USA:
Mike Hoerger on X, June 3, 2025
This is the lowest Covid transmission since "hot vax summer."
Does anyone remember how that turned out?
Last edited:
From:
UK - school absence:
Cat in the Hat's tweet was in response to this:
Not much, it seems ...
Cat in the Hat on X, June 5, 2025
Letโs be crystal clear: Persistent absence is still horrendously HIGH.
Pre-pandemic, persistent absence was ~10.9%.
So far this year, itโs at 18%, a rise of 65% vs pre-pandemic.
And the key driver is ILLNESS.
We have the tools to fix this thoughโฆ by CLEANING THE INDOOR AIR!
Cat in the Hat's tweet was in response to this:
Not much, it seems ...
Last edited:
marting
Illuminator
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
- Messages
- 4,249
Interesting graph. What's really weird is that the CDC also has an estimate of total Flu deaths since Oct. 2024 and it's a range between 27,000 and 130,000. The range is so large because USA Flu surveillance is spotty. The graph shows Flu deaths at around 18k. Here's the CDC link:
Preliminary Estimated Flu Disease Burden 2024-2025 Flu Season
Weekly, preliminary estimates of cumulative in-season flu burden in the United States.
www.cdc.gov
Yeah, habits. That must be it.
A long thread on X about the impact the pandemic has had on kids, from mortality to 'absenteeism'.
One example from last year:
Laura Miers on X, Aug 18, 2024
โThe positivity rate is one of the only timely metrics left to track the spread of the virus. Californiaโs rate has yet to show signs of slowing, since it first started growing in Mayโฆ
So how are schools handling back to school this year? In general, districts are not taking special precautionsโฆโ
Another year of magical thinking & Thoughts & Prayers. Best of luck, everyone. https://mercurynews.com/2024/08/16/bay-area-students-going-back-to-school-amid-ongoing-covid-wave/
Examples not just from the USA but also from places like the UK and Finland:
Ilkka Rauvola on X, Aug 25, 2024
Excess deaths: in Finland, deaths of 5-9 year olds have risen to a level five (5) times above normal in July, and 2.5 times above normal during the past year. Total excess deaths continue to decline.
Australia:
Mike Honey on X, June 22, 2025
Australian COVID-19 weekly stats update:
The risk estimate rose sharply last week to 1.3% โCurrently Infectiousโ, or 1-in-80. It has passed the peak from early Jan - the XEC wave.
That implies a 31% chance that someone is infectious in a group of 30.
#COVID19 #Australia
marting
Illuminator
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
- Messages
- 4,249
That's one weird chart dann.
Looking closely at the Finland chart it appears the red line is one year moving average, the blue line a 3-4 month moving average and the yellow a 5 week moving average.
A few things jump out.
1. There are 5 places where the 5 week average clips at -100%. This means zero deaths, let alone excess deaths, in the 5 weeks centered around each point.
2. The excess deaths don't occur until the latter half of 2021. Over a year after the start of C19!
When were kids 5-9 vaxxed? This is the sort of chart I'd expect to see from the anti-vaxxers!
I don't see what your problem is with the chart, marting.
I don't know when (or even if) "kids 5-9" were vaxed in Finland. Maybe Vixen can tell us. However, I do know that the other Nordic countries than
didn't let go of all other pandemic precautions than (including 'studying from home') till the winter of 2021-22, which was when excess mortality in 
really took off and even overtook . Until November 2021, and 
had negative excess mortality.
So you are right, there is a correlation (!) between excess mortality and, which was more or less complete (first two shots) by the summer of 2021 (earlier in than in , 
, and because 
sold 1.17 million Pfizer-BioNTech jabs to ):
Excess mortality: Cumulative deaths from all causes compared to projection based on previous years, per million people
But there is also the correlation that, after the, , , and (also) gave up on masking, TeTrIs, working and studying from home etc. In fact, people in were told to go out and get infected during Omicron because it would allegedly give them "super immunity": "Vaccinated + infected = super immunity". I assume that people in , and were told something similar.
You could say that the other Nordics embraced's herd immunity by infection post-, so that was when C19 dying really took off. I don't know why excess mortality got so much worse in than in , , and even , but if it had been due to the , it should have happened earlier in than in .
The lesson is that "the excess deaths don't occur until the latter half of 2021. Over a year after the start of C19!" because that's how effective the (not at all 'draconian') restrictions were in the four other Nordics than for the first 18 months or so of the pandemic.
Unlike most other European countries,, , and have the advantage of being very sparsely populated, but didn't really use that advantage for anything. On the contrary, it pursued Anders Tegnell's herd-immunity-by-infection strategy from the get go by keeping schools, bars and restaurants open and telling people that face masks were dangerous etc.
As for the other thing that 'jumps out': is a fairly small country, 5.6 million. I don't think it's weird that there were weeks when no kids aged 5 to 9 died. If they were not at home, they were probably meeting outdoors. The restrictions meant that infectious diseases other than C19 were also rare. And the 
must have stayed calm for whatever reason.
I don't know when (or even if) "kids 5-9" were vaxed in Finland. Maybe Vixen can tell us. However, I do know that the other Nordic countries than
didn't let go of all other pandemic precautions than (including 'studying from home') till the winter of 2021-22, which was when excess mortality in really took off and even overtook . Until November 2021, and had negative excess mortality.So you are right, there is a correlation (!) between excess mortality and
, which was more or less complete (first two shots) by the summer of 2021 (earlier in than in , , and because sold 1.17 million Pfizer-BioNTech jabs to ):Excess mortality: Cumulative deaths from all causes compared to projection based on previous years, per million people
But there is also the correlation that, after the
, , , and (also) gave up on masking, TeTrIs, working and studying from home etc. In fact, people in were told to go out and get infected during Omicron because it would allegedly give them "super immunity": "Vaccinated + infected = super immunity". I assume that people in , and were told something similar.You could say that the other Nordics embraced
's herd immunity by infection post-, so that was when C19 dying really took off. I don't know why excess mortality got so much worse in than in , , and even , but if it had been due to the , it should have happened earlier in than in .The lesson is that "the excess deaths don't occur until the latter half of 2021. Over a year after the start of C19!" because that's how effective the (not at all 'draconian') restrictions were in the four other Nordics than
for the first 18 months or so of the pandemic.Unlike most other European countries,
, , and have the advantage of being very sparsely populated, but didn't really use that advantage for anything. On the contrary, it pursued Anders Tegnell's herd-immunity-by-infection strategy from the get go by keeping schools, bars and restaurants open and telling people that face masks were dangerous etc.As for the other thing that 'jumps out':
is a fairly small country, 5.6 million. I don't think it's weird that there were weeks when no kids aged 5 to 9 died. If they were not at home, they were probably meeting outdoors. The restrictions meant that infectious diseases other than C19 were also rare. And the must have stayed calm for whatever reason.
Last edited: