Gravysites: Where 9/11 Conspiracies are Laid to Rest

[Fonebone]

Yes I have seen most if not all of this in the past.

First items, nowhere does this individual indicate where she was inside the Pentagon. There were many many individuals inside the Pentagon that day that were not sprayed with jet fuel, but they were not anywhere near the impact site. Her saying that she and others weren't sprayed with jet fuel does not in anyway disprove a plane crashing into the building.
Thank you for playing.

April Gallop has previously stated her desk was on the first floor of the E ring wedge approximately forty feet from the impact hole. She and other survivors escaped out through that hole onto the Pentagon lawn.
Thank you for pretending to play.

 

[bknight]

April Gallop has previously stated her desk was on the first floor of the E ring wedge approximately forty feet from the impact hole. She and other survivors escaped out through that hole onto the Pentagon lawn.
Thank you for pretending to play.

Forty feet from the impact hole and how many walls would fuel need to go through to shower her with it?
What caused the impact hole your imagination? When did the survivors escape? Not right away i=since there was fire engulfing the hole and some surround area, look at the videos after impact
I told you she did not indicate where she was in the video, my comment. If she indicated your response somewhere else, then you should have posted that in your post. You poorly present your belief. I'm not pretending to play you are.

 

[Brainster]

Gravy sites seem to not be working on those links anymore.

Any backup?

Archive.org has everything in its wayback machine.

 

[Myriad]

Bic?

Zippo.

 

[beachnut]

Here is an eyewitness account from OUTSIDE of the Pentagon.
https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/bn/date/2001-09-11/segment/35

[excerpt]
MCINTYRE: You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.[/excerpt]

(childish verbiage snipped)

Beachnut <9-11 truth seekers have learned to work in the dark. Bic?

What is your point? 77 crashed at high speed, explains why MCINTYRE sees no large parts. Thus you have no point? You have not expressed a conclusion on 77 hitting the Pentagon. Maybe you better stick with, What Music are you listening to RIGHT NOW? Part V, it does not require physics, sort of.

Gee whiz, how did the DNA from all those (save the small boy) on board 77 arrive in the Pentagon along the exact true course of Flight 77 impacted the Pentagon at 483.5 Knots. A speed which would destroy most of Flight 77 and kill all aboard.

Guess you can't comprehend 483.5 knots, and the Kinetic energy Flight 77 had at impact. 1215 pounds of TNT is the Kinetic energy equal. Why can't you do physics?

Usually pilots try to crash as slow as possible, which will leave tail sections, wings and larger debris. If a pilot crashes at landing speed, the Kinetic energy would be 101 pounds of TNT, but Flight 77 crash was intentional and the pilot pushed the throttles up to 100 percent to impact the Pentagon at high speed, 483.5 knots as found in the FDR in the Pentagon, the aircraft you can't figure out hit the Pentagon due to some fantasy world of woo.

Slow speed impacts would leave large pieces, Flight 77 had 12 times the energy at impact than a crash leaving large pieces. MCINTYRE thinks a crash should look like, he has no clue why there are no large parts. MCINTYRE has no clue how fast 77 was going, or why he is alive due to the impact being kinetic, and NOT a BOMB.

If you think there was no plane, you ignore reality based evidence, and use simile as your fantasy evidence. MCINTYRE is comparing crashes where the pilots tried not to crash, and slowed down. Simile, you are being fooled by a figure of speech.

truth seekers have learned to work in the dark - maybe you "truth seekers" need to use evidence next time and avoid falling for simile. It looked like there was no plane, when the parts, thousands of parts are right there.

Sad to see you can't figure out the only thing that could make the damage is an object the exact size, weight, speed of Flight 77.

911 truth, spreading lies forever, delusionally thinking they are truth seekers.

Did simile trick 9/11 truth cult followers. Why do those who fall for this nonsense fonebone pushes lack skills in math and physics? Why are english majors able to see the simile is not evidence and comprehend reality (the same for math majors, as I watch on as a engineer major and an ATP heavy driver/pilot)?

What would you expect to see when Flight 77 impacts the Pentagon at 483.5 knots? Explain what would be left? Make my day, use physics for once.

BTW, a note... Pilots are trained to cut off the throttles as the last step in a crash, at touch down - it is procedure in some types of crashes - it puts out the big fire in the engine. No big deal but two large Flight 77 engines are 100 percent throttle will only help ignite all the fuel atomized at impact to form the giant fuel fireball seen at the Pentagon at 77's impact.

Oopsee, another piece of evidence of 77, the fireball of an aircraft crash. Darn, how do you explain it in the fantasy you have of 9/11?

Yes, I can see you truth seekers are in the dark when it comes to 9/11.

thanks again for a typing tutor experience - please excuse all english errors, I am not ESL, it is all my fault

Zippo. (better than the Bic, believe it comrade?) Did 77 hit the Pentagon? Yes - based on evidence.

Remember, the jet fuel fire ball is actual evidence, and is exactly what Flight 77 impact would look like and did look like on 9/11. Use evidence? BTW, the simile stuff you present, is also evidence for Flight 77's impact. Darn this is too easy...

No big parts = high speed impact great energy = Flight 77 impact at 483.5 knots

Zippo.

 

[jaydeehess]

It amazes me that no conspiracy theorists have commented on a strictly liquid fuel fire causing the collapse of an overpass on I-95.
but but but gasoline cannot melt steel and concrete. LOL

 

[jaydeehess]

Here is an eyewitness account from OUTSIDE of the Pentagon.
https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/bn/date/2001-09-11/segment/35

[excerpt]
MCINTYRE: You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.[/excerpt]

That is a witness AFTER the fact. He is saying that there is very little aircraft debris outside the building. That is to be expected. You like metaphor? How much evidence is there outside the body when it is shot by a bullet? None, and unless it is a full metal jacket bullet, it is designed to tumble and come apart INSIDE the body, where it causes more damage.

You seem to expect that an aircraft weighing hundreds of tons would simply peel apart on the outside wall and scatter large pieces on the lawn. Why do you expect this? Please give us a scientific argument as to why this would be expected. This aircraft was going 555MPH when it hit. You may use that in your calcs.

 

[Dave Rogers]

Here is an eyewitness account from OUTSIDE of the Pentagon.
https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/bn/date/2001-09-11/segment/35

[excerpt]
MCINTYRE: You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.[/excerpt]

What a shameless and dishonest piece of quote mining. McIntyre was responding to a question about whether the plane crashed before hitting the Pentagon, and is stating that the visible debris indicated that in fact it hit the Pentagon without hitting the ground. To claim that this means that no airplane hit the Pentagon, if you've read the transcript you took it from, is a flat-out lie.

Dave

 

[cjnewson88]

What a shameless and dishonest piece of quote mining. McIntyre was responding to a question about whether the plane crashed before hitting the Pentagon, and is stating that the visible debris indicated that in fact it hit the Pentagon without hitting the ground. To claim that this means that no airplane hit the Pentagon, if you've read the transcript you took it from, is a flat-out lie.

Dave

Especially when, in the same transcription he links McIntyre was just previously talking about the aircraft debris on the heliport and in front of the Pentagon.. the level of dishonest cherry picking one expects from these "truth seekers".

Archive.org has everything in its wayback machine.

Ah, yes, thank you