I wonder why she was in solitary confinement for 22 months.
.....
They pretty clearly wanted to make sure there was no repetition of the Jeffrey Epstein death. But they didn't necessarily handle it as well as they could have.
I wonder why she was in solitary confinement for 22 months.
.....
I wonder why she was in solitary confinement for 22 months.
I’m no fan, but that seems to border on cruel and unusual unless there was good justification. And if she was that isolated, body cavity searches do seem punitive rather than justified. Assuming everything in the complaints is in fact true.
It is all relative to expectations.
I do not for a heartbeat think she would expect approbation for acts of sin replicated at extreme levels by eg Putin Trump.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/m...cutors/ar-AAYLnvc?ocid=mailsignout&li=BBnb7KzNEW YORK (Reuters) -Ghislaine Maxwell should be sentenced to between 30 and 55 years in prison after being convicted of helping the sex offender and globetrotting financier Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls, U.S. prosecutors said on Wednesday.
Prosecutors ask for hard time:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/m...cutors/ar-AAYLnvc?ocid=mailsignout&li=BBnb7Kz
....
She has gotten off lightly IMO. She at least has a chance of not dying in prison.
From the victim impact statement of Annie Farmer
Annie Farmer, who told a court that Ghislaine Maxwell gave her a nude massage and groped her breasts at Mr Epstein’s ranch in Sanata Fe, New Mexico when she was 16, said in her victim impact statement that she has "wanted to erase from my mind the crimes that Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein committed against me and pretend they hadn’t happened for a long time".
"It was the type of dark memory that feels safest to keep locked away, and so I did the best I could."
"One of the most painful and ongoing impacts of Maxwell and Epstein’s abuse was a loss of trust in myself, my perceptions, and my instincts," she said, adding: "When predators groom and then abuse or exploit children and other vulnerable people, they are, in a sense, training them to distrust themselves."
"The ripple effects of trauma are undeniable, when one person is abused, many others are harmed."
"Judge Nathan, I hope when you consider the appropriate prison sentence for the role Maxwell played in this sex trafficking operation, you take into account the ongoing suffering of the many women she abused and exploited as we will continue to live with the memories of the ways she harmed us."
"I ask you to bear in mind how Maxwell’s unwillingness to acknowledge her crimes, her lack of remorse, and her repeated lies about her victims created the need for many of us to engage in a long fight for justice that has felt like a black hole sucking in our precious time, energy, and well-being for much too long now."
"These things cannot be replaced."
That's the thing. Maxwell didn't only facilitate the sexual abuse - she also instigated some of it.
She got off lightly - with reference to Bob001's information/observation, I only hope her sense of entitlement is so great that she doesn't manage to get off for good behaviour.
Whilst I agree Maxwell got what she deserved, I am uncomfortable by the US style of tiral-by-public opinion (cf Depp vs Heard)
Judge Nathan didn't seem impartial and seemed to be anti-Maxwell from the start.
A judge is supposed to reserve judgment until all of the evidence is heard.
In addition, in the UK, I doubt she would have got more than nine years.
... (1) if the offense was effected by force, fraud, or coercion or if the person transported had not attained the age of 14 years at the time of such offense, by a fine under this title or imprisonment for any term of years or for life, or both; or ...
Whilst I agree Maxwell got what she deserved, I am uncomfortable by the US style of tiral-by-public opinion (cf Depp vs Heard). Judge Nathan didn't seem impartial and seemed to be anti-Maxwell from the start. A judge is supposed to reserve judgment until all of the evidence is heard. In addition, in the UK, I doubt she would have got more than nine years.
What was the age of her youngest victim(s)?
Youngest who testified was 14.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/woman-maxwell-abused-age-14-81612630
she was first taken to Epstein’s estate in Palm Beach, Florida, by an older teenage friend, Virginia Roberts, now known as Virginia Giuffre.
I still find it bizarre that the prime mover in recruitment (and who was paid for recruiting) has not faced justice. Being a teenager is not normally grounds for not being tried for a crime, it is a defence to be presented at the trial.
I still find it bizarre that the prime mover in recruitment (and who was paid for recruiting) has not faced justice. Being a teenager is not normally grounds for not being tried for a crime, it is a defence to be presented at the trial.
You understand that she was convicted by a jury, not the judge, right? You can be sure that any evidence of impartiality would be used by the defense as grounds for appeal. And why should we care that somewhere else she would get a relative slap on the wrist for decades of predation and assault on girls and young women?
Giuffre is a piece of work for sure thank you for reminding us all.I still find it bizarre that the prime mover in recruitment (and who was paid for recruiting) has not faced justice. Being a teenager is not normally grounds for not being tried for a crime, it is a defence to be presented at the trial.
Giuffre is a piece of work for sure thank you for reminding us all.
I never rejoice in suffering by those who hardly knew which Shakespearian tragedy they were part of.Sad to see you joining the victim-blaming crowd.
I never rejoice in suffering by those who hardly knew which Shakespearian tragedy they were part of.
Flawed characters.Err, what?![]()
I think you are trying to say....I disagree with either Maxwell or Giuffre being called a 'bitch'. I can see the story on both sides. Whilst I have every sympathy with Giuffre and Ransome, and the other victims, there seems to lack balance in who is to blame for the latter's suffering. There is no doubt they have suffered enormously. However, Giuffre was being trafficked out to prostitution by her sixty-something pervert boyfriend years before she crossed paths with Epstein and Maxwell. Giuffre, contrary to belief was nearer 17 when she met the pair and became employed as Epstein's personal masseuse and recruiter of other young women, from locale high schools. Yes, Maxwell was clearly part of a conspiracy to provide prostitutes for rich men in a sophisticated prostitution ring but it takes more than one person to have a conspiracy. I get that Ransome ended up in hopsital after trying to kill herself. However, I am not seeing that it is Maxwell who si 100% responsible for this. Yes, she was calculating, sly and wicked. However, she may have been avictim of Epstein, too. The evidence for this is that after the pair split in 2004, Maxwell's pimping activities ceased.
Flawed characters.
Ghislaine Maxwell.
Virginia Giuffre.
Planigale sees nuance and why would we resile from discussing accuser and accused in the broad sweep of character flaws.
I think you are trying to say....
Just kidding.
These sins will never be resolved by vilifying Maxwell and sanctifying Giuffre.
Deconstructing the pecadilloes of the rich and famous gets in the way of dealing with those who truly suffer in miserable jurisdictions that are everywhere except America.
Not innocent but a bit player in a terrible universe of sin, I have great difficulty separating her way of controlling the fates of young women from the methods constructed by pillars of society.One doesn't spell "underage rapes" like that.
If you said that Maxwell wasn't the only guilty party, I'd agree. And Maxwell's clients have so far got away with it. But that doesn't make her innocent. Or undeserving of being incarcerated for the rest of her life (which she probably won't be). She got off lightly.
I disagree with either Maxwell or Giuffre being called a 'bitch'. I can see the story on both sides. Whilst I have every sympathy with Giuffre and Ransome, and the other victims, there seems to lack balance in who is to blame for the latter's suffering. There is no doubt they have suffered enormously. However, Giuffre was being trafficked out to prostitution by her sixty-something pervert boyfriend years before she crossed paths with Epstein and Maxwell. Giuffre, contrary to belief was nearer 17 when she met the pair and became employed as Epstein's personal masseuse and recruiter of other young women, from local high schools. Yes, Maxwell was clearly part of a conspiracy to provide prostitutes for rich men in a sophisticated prostitution ring but it takes more than one person to have a conspiracy. I get that Ransome ended up in hopsital after trying to kill herself. However, I am not seeing that it is Maxwell who si 100% responsible for this. Yes, she was calculating, sly and wicked. However, she may have been avictim of Epstein, too. The evidence for this is that after the pair split in 2004, Maxwell's pimping activities ceased.
But why not address Planigale's inconvenient truth?Who's claiming that Maxwell was ever "100% responsible" for what went on? And why do you even think this is relevant to the safety/justness of her conviction? If three men kick a vagrant to death, each of those three can safely be convicted of murder, even though it's clearly arguable that none of the three is "100% responsible" for the vagrant's death.
And what difference does it make to Maxwell's criminal culpability if prior criminal offences were committed against the same victim(s) by others? In your view, does that somehow mitigate - or even obviate - Maxwell's own guilt??
Your attempted arguments here are baffling, ill-judged, and entirely incorrect in law and ethics.
Not innocent but a bit player in a terrible universe of sin, I have great difficulty separating her way of controlling the fates of young women from the methods constructed by pillars of society.
Not innocent but a bit player in a terrible universe of sin, I have great difficulty separating her way of controlling the fates of young women from the methods constructed by pillars of society.
Who's claiming that Maxwell was ever "100% responsible" for what went on? And why do you even think this is relevant to the safety/justness of her conviction? If three men kick a vagrant to death, each of those three can safely be convicted of murder, even though it's clearly arguable that none of the three is "100% responsible" for the vagrant's death.
And what difference does it make to Maxwell's criminal culpability if prior criminal offences were committed against the same victim(s) by others? In your view, does that somehow mitigate - or even obviate - Maxwell's own guilt??
Your attempted arguments here are baffling, ill-judged, and entirely incorrect in law and ethics.
A bit player whose universe collided with Clinton etc. It is incomprehensible that she is the sole fall girl in this sordid narrative.No way was she just a "bit player"!! Maxwell was a fully participating, willing co-conspirator who knew exactly what she was doing, and was doing it for her own personal and financial benefit.
No she wasn't a bit player. She was a key accomplice of Epstein.
So was Giuffre also criminal as Planigale alleges?
<snip>
And you know, what really ***** me off? It is that Maxwell has shown utterly no remorse for what she has done - no apology to the dozens (maybe more) of women whose lives she and Epstein so badly damaged by their actions. The sole extent of her comments was some snarky remark she made.... "To you, all the victims … I am sorry for the pain that you experienced. I hope my conviction and harsh incarceration brings you closure"...
Did you note the total lack of acknowledgement of her own culpability in inflicting that pain on those women? No remorse there!
Did you note in that last sentence that she referred to her sentence as "harsh"? The only person she is sorry for is herself, for being caught!
A bit player whose universe collided with Clinton etc. It is incomprehensible that she is the sole fall girl in this sordid narrative.
No. The only thing that is "incomprehensible" is your (and other Maxwell apologists') inability to understand the difference between a "victim" and a "perpetrator" of sexual violence.
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell are PERPETRATORS of sexual violence!
Virginia Giuffre, Annie Farmer, Sarah Ransome, Elizabeth Stein, Jane, Kate and Carolyn are just some of their VICTIMS!
More of a misogynist than an apologist, IMO.No. The only thing that is "incomprehensible" is your (and other Maxwell apologists') inability to understand the difference between a "victim" and a "perpetrator" of sexual violence.
Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell are PERPETRATORS of sexual violence!
Virginia Giuffre, Annie Farmer, Sarah Ransome, Elizabeth Stein, Jane, Kate and Carolyn are just some of their VICTIMS!