• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories
  • You may need to edit your signatures.

    When we moved to Xenfora some of the signature options didn't come over. In the old software signatures were limited by a character limit, on Xenfora there are more options and there is a character number and number of lines limit. I've set maximum number of lines to 4 and unlimited characters.

Firefox privacy issue

Wudang

BOFH
Joined
Jun 30, 2003
Messages
17,603
Location
People's Republic of South Yorkshire
Via Jeff Martin https://mastodon.social/@cuchaz@gladtech.social

Yup, it's true. Firefox 128 includes new adtech features that are turned on by default and announced with very little fanfare, so most people might not even know they're there. :blobcatverysad:

Well, this is me telling you they're there. You might want to go ahead and take a minute to opt out.

Here's the little helpful explainer from Mozilla about how it all works:

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/privacy-preserving-attribution

My read seems to be: Mozilla says website surveillance is generally bad and should be defended against. Cool. No notes. Firefox actually has a lot of nice anti-tracking and privacy features there and that's the main reason why I like Firefox.

But, and I swear I'm not even joking a little bit here, Mozilla goes on to say that advertisers might be happier if Firefox itself just tracked you directly and sent activity reports back to them.

Doesn't that sound great?

Now, to Mozilla's credit, they claim to anonymize the activity reports. And you can still meaningfully opt out of the whole system.

But WTF, mate?! I use Firefox *because* it fights against adtech. Or at least it used to. Now, Mozilla just lets adtech right in the front door and hopes you won't notice? :blobcat_thisisfine:

Well, we noticed. Mozilla is damage and we need to route around it.

UPDATE: The about:config setting for this is `dom.private-attribution.submission.enabled`. It's a bool. Set it to false to turn it off.
 
From your link:

To opt out, do the following:

Click the menu button and select Settings.
In the Privacy & Security panel, find the Website Advertising Preferences section.
Uncheck the box labeled Allow websites to perform privacy-preserving ad measurement.

:thumbsup:

Should not have been enabled by default. :eek:
 
I have no problem in principle, with anonymized usage data. But none of the major players seem to be forthcoming about what exactly they do anonymize me.

It seems obvious that our current information ecosystem depends pretty heavily on a web of symbiotic/parasitic/co-dependent relationships. Advertisers - people with products to sell - clearly play an important part in this ecosystem. They need to be fed, too. So it really depends on exactly what info Firefox is sending, to understand who's exploiting who. Who's the parasite and who's the host?
 
The beauty of the boys at Mozilla is that they do a great job at not having us see ads at all. So even if they are giving anonymous data, it will surely result in some form.of targeted advertising?
 
Shenanigans from Chrome
https://simonwillison.net/2024/Jul/9/hangout_servicesthunkjs/
It turns out Google Chrome (via Chromium) includes a default extension which makes extra services available to code running on the *.google.com domains
....<snip>...
It looks like it's a way to let Google Hangouts ... get additional information from the browser, including the current load on the user's CPU

OK maybe not massive as it stands but it does make you wonder what else maybe out there.
 
One of many reasons I follow Charles Stross on Mastodon.

Yeah I'm suspicious of anonymised data after reading how much Google is still able to pull from other search engines that use it behind the scenes.

The Laundry series author?

Also, thanks fr the ehads up, Wudang. checking my settings now
 
I'm shocked people here are shocked. Nothing is free. If you're using something that is free it's because you are the product. I thought that was common knowledge.
 
Back
Top Bottom