• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories
  • You may need to edit your signatures.

    When we moved to Xenfora some of the signature options didn't come over. In the old software signatures were limited by a character limit, on Xenfora there are more options and there is a character number and number of lines limit. I've set maximum number of lines to 4 and unlimited characters.

Ethics of Tarot Reading.

Mr Wolf

New Blood
Joined
May 1, 2005
Messages
20
Hi,

This is something I am giving a lot of thought to recently, and I wanted some opinions.

In my youth I was into all sorts of magic and mysticism. Crystals, Astrology, Tarot, I-Ching. You name it, I looked into it.

At the time I considered it part of a search for knowledge.

The I realised how science worked and havn't looked back since.

I am glad I am knowledgeable on these subjects, as it gives me a good perspective when arguing against them with people who practice them, and who dont understand their own subjects as much as the skeptic they are arguing with. ;)

My problem comes from two things.

Firstly, I am a poor student, and am always looking at ways to make a little money to make live more bearable.

Secondly, my mother just paid a Tarot Reader to do a reading for a group of her friends they paid her twelve pounds sterling per head, and she required a minimum group of 6 people. Thats 72 quid for a few hours work.

You see where I am going with this? :)

But I am wrestling with my concience over this as I have for years complained about con artists taking peoples money, and fostering the mindset of these kooky beliefs.

I dispise with a vengence the type of con artists that prey on peoples beliefs in an afterlife and cliam to talk to the dearly departed, while using blatent and badly executed cold reading techniques.

But from my experience of reading tarot cards in the past, I have found them to be a bit more benign. And I think I could make the readings a bit less woo woo, and make them a bit more geared towards giving harmless advice.

But yes, it still supports the "mystical" worldview, which I dont like.

I have thought about telling the people I read for that I was just using cold reading techniques and that I dont believe in the cards, after a reading. But I think this would make people feel insulted.

But 12 quid a head could really make my summer bearable.

Thoughts?
 
Mr Wolf said:
Thoughts?

Hmm... I'd rather you didn't do it, but I know how tempting money can be when you need it. Just in case you cannot resist the lure, I'll make a few suggestions:

What about putting all kinds of literature around debunking Tarot reading where you do the readings? Or playing an act of "those rotten skeptics say this about what I do?" Do your Tarot reading, but point out the things skeptics say about Tarot reading?

Maybe there's a way with a little critical thinking that you could lure in the mystic types, get paid for your otherwise useless knowege, AND maybe expose them to critical thinking?
 
Mr Wolf said:


Thoughts?

What exactly would you be offering the people in exchange for their twelve quid? If you're billing yourself as a party entertainer, and all they expect is entertainment, then it's probably fair. It's no worse to pay 12 quid to watch a good Tarot worker than to watch a good juggler.

If they actually think you're offering something other than a good show,.... well, there are words that describe people who take money under false pretences. With the possible exception of "Member of Parliament," few of them are complimentary.
 
Mr Wolf said:
Firstly, I am a poor student ...

... And I think I could make the readings a bit less woo woo, and make them a bit more geared towards giving harmless advice.
Study psychology instead of giving amateur advice :)
 
If you are honest with them from the outset that you don't believe in any of it, and that any significance they attribute to it is up to then then I guess it might be okay.

But if you in any way lead the clients to believe it is real, or you believe in it, and still charge them for it then that is fraud.

In that case it is not the "Ethics of Tarot reading" but merely the "Ethics of Fraud", and you might as well ask us if any sort of fraud is okay.
It's really not. No different from any sort of scam where someone pretends to offer a service when they have no intention of doing so.
And in some ways worse as, at the same time, you are bolstering false beliefs in people.

Sorry it'll have to be real work for the summer instead.:(
 
What exactly would you be offering the people in exchange for their twelve quid? If you're billing yourself as a party entertainer, and all they expect is entertainment, then it's probably fair. It's no worse to pay 12 quid to watch a good Tarot worker than to watch a good juggler.

I also Juggle. ;) Which is a much more usefull skill. :)

that is my view of how to bill it.

I have been doing readings for friends, just to see if I still could, and at the end of the reading they invariably ask, "Do you actually believe in this stuff?" Which then allows me to launch into the whole skeptic rant I usually give. :)

I have trouble lying to people, so if they asked I would have to tell them I didnt believe. But if I tell them before hand it would spoil the illusion for them and therefore the fun. And if I tell them afterwards it might stop them from hiring me again.

But I think billing it as a form of entertainment might work. Then answer questions honestly if they are asked.

Sorry it'll have to be real work for the summer instead.

Peh, why do real work when you can con bored housewives and grannies out of their cash. :P j/k

Thanks for the replies.
 
Mr Wolf
If you ask me it's insane to pay £12 for a tarot reading anyway. Still people do it.

I remember doing palmistry/tarot readings as part of a fundraising fair and I got quite a lot for all I charged. Of course I only charged £1 per reading but I read for about 30-40 people over a 3 hour period so I got £37. Each reading was short and lasted only about 5 minutes but I talked fast.
 
Comedy Tarot readings.

Subject draws "The Hanged Man". "Well, it says here you're looking for a well hung guy." Ba-dum CHING!

Now *that's* entertainment!

- Timothy
 
Lol, I will remember that one. ;)

Yeah for 12 pounds I would probably give them a birthstone or a trinket of some kind too. :)



Nothng?
 
Mr Wolf, if I were you, I wouldn't listen to impassioned skeptics. They think that all "scamming" is evil, regardless of whether it is fraudulent or not.

Don't feel guilt about lying to people, as long as you're not defrauding them. They are the ones who believe you, and they get their own benefits (hope, comfort, confirmation) by talking to you. You are also giving a small service to your society by taking money off the hands of irrational people.
 
First and foremost would be the "entertainment purposes only" disclaimer.

Second would be to say up front what the cards "can and cannot do." For example, I have an acquaintance who does this for a living, and she tells her clients that the cards do not answer questions. They can only give generalities, and it is up to the client to decide how they apply.

But even with that in place, understand that there will be people who will believe that the cards and/or you are truly insightful, and may actually make life decisions based on what you say.

Know also that some people are going to ask you things like "Is my daughter in heaven now?" or "Is my husband unfaithful?"

These things will most likely either:

1. Disturb you, and you will give the whole thing up, or
2. Lure you, bit by bit, over to "the dark side," where you will become that which you profess to despise.

Your call, but I would advise against it.
 
EVERY Tarot card reader claims they are doing what they do "for entertainment purposes only." That's how they get around the fraud laws.

Don't do it.

The more you learn about the paranormal and how unbelievably easy it is to get some people to believe ANYTHING, the more often you will feel those tugs of greed to get on the bandwagon.

Get used to it.

I'm sure many a fraudster started out as just kidding around and eventually the temptation pulled them to the dark side and they began to become serious in their scamming.

There is nothing even remotely funny about taking advantage of people's gullibility. And they won't appreciate post facto revelations/education.

All you will end up with is contempt for those who believe, and that is not the way to go.
 
I'd say that if you do it, drill the entertainment disclaimer into them before doing any reading. Really drill it into their skulls. If someone particularly gullible shows up, bowing in worship of you, bring it back up, firmer each time they express their belief in your nonexistant powers.

Maybe you should tell them it's an act afterwards, how you did it, and hopefully they'll leave a few pounds/dollars wiser. Demands for refunds might be a problem with that, however.
 
I've occasionally considered taking my pack of Tarot cards and my crystal ball along to the local Psychic Fair, and doing cold readings of people. At the end I would tell them that regardless of how accurate they thought I was, I did not have psychic powers and neither did anyone else. Then I would refund them the money they paid for the session.

I planned this for a little while, but then I figured that once the organisers got wind of what I was doing I'd be kicked out of the fair.
 
Hmmm, I am still undecided.

It really does feel like a temptation to the dark side. I am not doing it for the purposes of education, I am really doing it for the money.

Not sure that is a good reason.

I work with a bird of prey rescue centre, and we are currently arranging a sort of medieval fair. With demonstrations of Falconry, Archery and that sort of stuff. I may do a stall there with the proceeds going to the charity, just to see what it is like. And of course the next time my mother wants to pay 12 pounds a head for a reading, I will offer to do it for a good bit cheaper, and make sure I explain the concept of "for entertainment purposes"

My worry is that regardless of what I tell these people, I know there are some that will say that even if I dont believe in it that it is still true. I have met these people before and there is no explianing things to them. "God is working through you even if you believe in him or not"

I dont see people with beliefs as the enemy. Rather as people with a kind of cureable mental disorder. And I dont feel good taking advantage of that.

Demands for refunds would be given with a smile and a handshake. ;)

I guess I dont really want to do it or I wouldnt even be discussing it.
Maybe I should stick to the juggling.
 
Francois Tremblay said:


Don't feel guilt about lying to people, as long as you're not defrauding them.

I'm not sure how you lie to people in order to take their money, but don't defraud them.

Similarly, I'm not sure what an example of "scamming" that isn't evil would be.

Perhaps you would take this opportunity to explain the subtleties of ethical reasoning that are obviously going over my head?
 
Mr Wolf said:
... But I am wrestling with my concience over this as I have for years complained about con artists taking peoples money, and fostering the mindset of these kooky beliefs...
I would have thought this is pretty cut and dry.

You have asked people's opinions and they have pretty much all said this is fraud.

It sounds like you really actually do want to do it and are looking for some form of 'permission'.

You won't be getting it here.

If you are pretending to believe in things when you don't and are getting paid money by people without informing them of this then it is fraud.
It is also morally pretty unpleasant.

I think it's time to stop trying to rationalise it as anything but getting money for yourself by deception.
The fact that you'll give refunds if caught doesn't make it any better.

Our advice is - don't do it for both legal and moral reasons.

It's up to you if your desire for the money overrides that advice.
 
Yeah, thats true.

But where is the line drawn?

Is it up to the performer or the audience to be aware of the deception.

If I believed in the tarot, would I then be a fraud?

If neither my audience or me believed in it and considered it only a performance, would it be a fraud?

I dont think it can be a legal issue, because surely you would need to prove legally that the tarot didnt work.

I agree that as a skeptic and critical thinker I shouldnt do it due to the fact that there are people out there for whom my actions would reenforce their beliefs, but can it really be a legal issue? And yes I was motivated the money.

Has anyone sucessfully sued a medium or psychic?
 
Mr Wolf said:
Yeah, thats true.

But where is the line drawn?

Is it up to the performer or the audience to be aware of the deception.
So why ask us?
If I believed in the tarot, would I then be a fraud?
Moot point, I hope. You do not. It is fraud.
If neither my audience or me believed in it and considered it only a performance, would it be a fraud?
It would then be simple cruelty. I have seen readings on paltalk get out of hand very quickly. Are you prepared for the person who is making major decisions (finance, love, life itself) based on your entertainment?
I dont think it can be a legal issue, because surely you would need to prove legally that the tarot didnt work.
Yeah, I guess if you don't get caught it is ok. Morals are for losers. Only suckers do the right thing.
I agree that as a skeptic and critical thinker I shouldnt do it due to the fact that there are people out there for whom my actions would reenforce their beliefs, but can it really be a legal issue? And yes I was motivated the money.
Prostitution is more honest.
Has anyone sucessfully sued a medium or psychic?
Do you really care? If you could get away with murder, would you do it?
 
Mr Wolf said:
Thoughts?
Pretty much what most have said, if you're going to do it, tell the client this is only for entertainment. Tell them in a clear way too. Not telling the client is fraud pure and simple, and there is always the risk of trouble with the law, albeit small as it may be.
Originally posted by Mr Wolf
Maybe I should stick to the juggling.
Good idea. Could it be possible to get hired by a circus, or carnival of some kind? Hire out to kids parties, stuff like that?

If your hard up for cash, why not do what alot of other students do, look for a job!! You know, the help wanted ads, a placement agency, an employment councillor, handing out resumes door to door even. Why do you even have to consider bilking people of their money?
 
arthwollipot said:
I've occasionally considered taking my pack of Tarot cards and my crystal ball along to the local Psychic Fair, and doing cold readings of people. At the end I would tell them that regardless of how accurate they thought I was, I did not have psychic powers and neither did anyone else. Then I would refund them the money they paid for the session.

I planned this for a little while, but then I figured that once the organisers got wind of what I was doing I'd be kicked out of the fair.
Would that be so bad? Now all you need is a journalist and a photographer!
 
No one is going to pay 12 quid for a reading full of disclaimers and denials. So forget trying to hedge it all. Either do it or don't do it, but don't pretend that there is a middle way that is both profitable and ethical.

If you do decide to go through with it, then my advice is to go all the way to the dark side. Why bother with cold reading when warm reading and hot reading are so easy in the situation that you describe? Go on the internet and gather information. Go to the client's house and talk to neighbors. Have a friend pretend that his car broke down in front of the client's house and ask the client if he can come in a use the telephone - a lot of information can be gained just by looking around the house. If you are going to throw away your ethics, then do it for 120 quid per head instead of 12 quid per head.
 
For everyone: What if the tarot reader made it clear that they were presenting the Tarot reading purely as a symbolic mechanism to assist sitters with thinking through their situation and their goals in life, and not as in any way an attempt to divine anything by supernatural means?
 
Kevin_Lowe said:
For everyone: What if the tarot reader made it clear that they were presenting the Tarot reading purely as a symbolic mechanism to assist sitters with thinking through their situation and their goals in life, and not as in any way an attempt to divine anything by supernatural means?
\

That's what I do. But I never charge for readings. I feel it's unethical.
 
Mr Wolf said:
I work with a bird of prey rescue centre, and we are currently arranging a sort of medieval fair. With demonstrations of Falconry, Archery and that sort of stuff. I may do a stall there with the proceeds going to the charity, just to see what it is like.
You could have some fun with that. Predict a murrain on their cattle, the black death, and an invasion by the wicked French. If you make it sufficiently medieval, you won't be fooling anyone, and can take their money, especially for charitable purposes, with a clear conscience.

Here's a good piece of cold reading for anyone under thirty: "The cards fortell a fat middle-aged balding man who constantly tells you what to do. Beware of him." If they exclaim "That's my teacher/headteacher/boss/bank manager" then continue: "The cards say that he's a witch..." And if they don't recognise the description --- then you used the word "fortell", didn't you?
 
Kevin_Lowe said:
For everyone: What if the tarot reader made it clear that they were presenting the Tarot reading purely as a symbolic mechanism to assist sitters with thinking through their situation and their goals in life, and not as in any way an attempt to divine anything by supernatural means?
Then we should still be left with the question of whether this was more or less effective than other methods, such as having a bit of a think, or talking it over with the more sensible of your friends, or doing some research to see what others have done in the same situation. How useful is it, after all, to introduce a random element into what I would wish to be a rational decision-making process? What happens if the correct solution to my problem is one which any level-headed person could have told me, but which cannot be given as an interpretation of the cards I happen to get dealt?

There seems to be a strong likelihood (a priori) that if nothing supernatural is involved, decisions made with the "aid" of the cards would tend to be worse than those made by other methods, because it introduces consideration of irrelevant facts (the particular cards dealt) into the decision-making process.

I don't know of any experimental data on this subject, though.
 
Rather, it is more the introduction of facts that, at first, seem irrelevant; but which may turn out to be just the key needed to come to the right conclusion.

Yeah. That's it.
 
zaayrdragon said:
Rather, it is more the introduction of facts that, at first, seem irrelevant; but which may turn out to be just the key needed to come to the right conclusion.

Yeah. That's it.
But if the fall of the cards is random, then the fact that I turn over, say, the seven of coins, is not relevant, and the attempt to fit it in with the actual facts of the case when I try to come to a decision will be at best useless labour and at worst actually misleading.
 
That's certainly one way to look at it.

But let's say you're looking at why you're having trouble completing a project at work, and in turning cards you pull up one that speaks about passion, relationships, sex; no, on the surface, it has nothing to do with your project. But perhaps, by someone/something randomly bringing that up, you might realize that you're being terribly distracted by something in your personal life, or something along those lines.

Of course, not every card turn applies. But the methodology can work - for or against, I'll admit - in very strange ways.

Some folks read Bible passages 'for inspiration'. This is much the same thing. Others might try to 'tune out' their problems and watch TV - and end up doing the same thing based on something they saw on television.

Not everyone can see a problem they're facing from all available angles. Very few are trained to analyze a situation fully. Few realize just how integrated their lives really are. A missed cup of coffee in the morning can change whether or not you get promoted at work; subconscious worries about a sick relative might be an unrealized block in trying to woo your current love interest.

Personally, I hate psychology; but there is something to it, and different folks prefer different tools to use psychology on themselves.

Of course, you might also mis-interpret these random cards; the real trick is recognizing the potential for error in any line of thought. Just because you turn up a dark-haired, dominating female who is 'against you' in the layout doesn't mean you should immediately distrust your dark-haired boss at work. You may not even know someone like that; in which case, you assign that bit a 'meaningless' status, and push it aside.

I've done a fair bit of writing, and it occurs to me that tools like tarot or runes are a lot like pre-writing exercises. If you get writer's block, and just have to do something, you might write about a different subject altogether, or try word-association, or dozens of other interesting techniques. It's much the same - sifting through the ol' grey matter for some speck you hadn't noticed before, essentially. Like a holistic search engine.
 
Greed, Temptation, Lawyerspeak. The Dark Side are these.

Beware! Of your feelings, be mindful, young Padawan. Let the skepticism FLOW through you.

If you turn to the Dark Side, the forever will it control your destiny. Resist, you must!
 
Dr Adequate said:
But if the fall of the cards is random, then the fact that I turn over, say, the seven of coins, is not relevant, and the attempt to fit it in with the actual facts of the case when I try to come to a decision will be at best useless labour and at worst actually misleading.

Playing Devil's Advocate here, you might well have some insight into a problem you are having if you consider it from a bizarre angle. It sounds like something Edward de Bono would do, for instance. We humans are very good at finding patterns in random data, which is why things like the I Ching and the Tarot are effective tools for fraud in the first place.

It seems to me that the worst possible outcome is a nonsensical fit between the cards and your problems which you can then ignore. That's no worse an outcome than if you went to a psychologist who couldn't help you, and it's cheaper (as it should be given you aren't a psychologist).
 
I hate the whole attributing honesty to skeptism. Im as dishonest as it comes. My latest gag tricked a guy out of a new computer. I dont care about other peoples' feelings.

I have often thought about setting up a fake tarrot reading thing to rake in some money. Only thing is, it would make enemies of my friends at the JREF forums.
 
DavoMan said:
I hate the whole attributing honesty to skeptism. Im as dishonest as it comes. My latest gag tricked a guy out of a new computer. I dont care about other peoples' feelings.

I have often thought about setting up a fake tarrot reading thing to rake in some money. Only thing is, it would make enemies of my friends at the JREF forums.

Might as well go for the tarot reading thing, I suspect you just made enemies of most of us anyway.

Fraud is wrong. Fraud with supernatural trappings is wrong because it is fraud, not because it has supernatural trappings.
 
Supernatural stuff is one thing, Fruad is another. If there is a way to cash in on stupidity of others, I'm all for it.

Normally I leave my ethics out of the JREF forums. This thread is an execption, re the title.

I'm more or less submitting that being a 'skeptic' of something doesnt imply any kind of moral code. I'm sure you could find a couple of 'skeptics' on this forum who hate each other.
 
It seems with skill and tact you might be able to create an act that entertained and informed people about the history and reality of tarot cards.

The problem I see is how to deal with an audience that expects to have their gullibility pandered to. I am thinking about somebody like my sister in law who seems to routinely have woo woo in her life. She is religious, studies tarot cards, etc. She is very excited to be going to a John Edward show and she comes to see your little show and finds somebody trying to tell her nicely that this is all a bunch of crap. I don't know how she'd react but it's always been a part of her life and I wouldn't expect a very positive reaction from her.

My wife and I met a fellow at the last TAM who was making a living doing something like this. He put on a magic act for schools that had skepticism as a theme. I am sorry I don't remember his name but he might be a good contact for some thoughts on this subject.

This is also the kind of question that Randi might have something interesting to say about. You might write him and see if he'll respond.
 

Back
Top Bottom