Mojo
Mostly harmless
No conspiracy theory is ever too dumb for conspiracy theorists.Yep. It was a dumb conspiracy theory at the time, and it's been a dumb conspiracy theory ever since. Time to put it back to bed and move on.
No conspiracy theory is ever too dumb for conspiracy theorists.Yep. It was a dumb conspiracy theory at the time, and it's been a dumb conspiracy theory ever since. Time to put it back to bed and move on.
On the other hand, most conspiracy theories are too dumb to be worth dragging out in pointless debate, long after they've been thoroughly debunked.No conspiracy theory is ever too dumb for conspiracy theorists.
Sure; but the ones in charge of the inquiries that found no evidence of conspiracy were the part of the conspiracy charged with finding no evidence of conspiracy. To understand CTist thinking, you have to first grasp the essential tautology at the heart of it, the idea that every effect can be attributed to the one cause.Were there not at least two separate inquiries into Diana's death and they all found no evidence of a conspiracy at all to kill her? They all took years, had hundreds of witnesses and found basically nada.
Seconded. And no discussion of who killed it.Please just let this thread die.
PookieBear still checking in daily, though. Shouldn't we let our Pook flag fly (at least at half mast) in her honor?Seconded. And no discussion of who killed it.
Seconded. And no discussion of who killed it.
Has this thread literally turned into a cargo cult?
Well, I am currently waiting for a parcel to be delivered. Does that count?
Well, I am currently waiting for a parcel to be delivered. Does that count?
Not that much different from the real Amazon, where sometimes you get somebody else's parcel, or they get yours.Only if you've made a fake parcel box out of bamboo and are sitting there holding a piece of cardboard with the Amazon parcel tracking page drawn on it. Oh, and it's someone else's parcel you're waiting for.
(By coincidence I'm listening to the audiobook of Dream Park at the moment)
Not that much different from the real Amazon, where sometimes you get somebody else's parcel, or they get yours.
I've luckily not had to participate in that game yet, but I have seen people playing it online, via the medium of Facebook (sometimes successfully).There's the fun game where they leave your parcel at a random location within your general area, then send you a photo of it and a few square foot around it & you have to go find it. Oh, and hope you don't get caught on a security camera "stealing" your own parcel! I found myself playing that at about 11pm in the snow before Xmas.
I've luckily not had to participate in that game yet, but I have seen people playing it online, via the medium of Facebook (sometimes successfully).
It's €10,000 per transaction in Ireland on foot of EU regulations, though those limits came in well after Diana's death.It's not clear to me whether these large sums (was it 8,000 3 months in a row?) were cash deposits by Paul himself or payments from someone else. If they were considered potentially suspicious* then I'd expect the authorities to have follow up who paid them unless it was cash deposited by Paul himself.
I'm sure his job would have been an ideal position for a bit of drug dealing or pimping to wealthy clients, which would explain large amounts of cash. I'm less convinced the pampered guests at the Paris Ritz often find they have a craving for weapons. I'm not sure what lucrative thing he might have done as an "undercover operative". That sounds rather like a movie playing in your head, I'm afraid.
I've already asked but let's try again: Do you suppose that spies are especially highly paid?
* I vaguely remember there's a threshold amount where banks report on large cash payments or transfers. Might be $10,000 in the US, that sort of amount. If he was depositing multiple sums a bit less than that it might well be to avoid attracting attention.
Myself and my mother were accidentally rearended a good few years ago (before I had a licence so mam was driving). The other party readily admitted fault and it was a fairly minor ding (cracked rear bumper). My mother wanted it off the insurance because she could get it done for roughly €100. The other driver wanted to everything by the book so mam had to go through official dealer who decided the bumper needed replacing and charged north of €2,000.In a funny sort of way I actually quite like that attitude to minor dings. Admittedly I'm saying that after having someone pull up behind me and stop while I was in motion pulling out of a parking space where a van had parked next to me and blocked my line of sight, £2k for a single dent. Yes I was at fault, but I use that carpark several times a week and if I see someone reversing out of a space and know it's going to be hard for them to see me I hold back for five seconds dammit!
Myself and my mother were accidentally rearended a good few years ago (before I had a licence so mam was driving). The other party readily admitted fault and it was a fairly minor ding (cracked rear bumper). My mother wanted it off the insurance because she could get it done for roughly €100. The other driver wanted to everything by the book so mam had to go through official dealer who decided the bumper needed replacing and charged north of €2,000.
And if not Moron, the Torygraph were more likely to be at fault than security services.Phone hacked?
Probably Piers Morgan
So, by Fiat?Because she said so.
So, by Fiat?
We are certainly finding the depth of the threads suspicious in the shroud discussion.Does anybody else find the death of this thread suspicious?