• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories

Dirt is alive!

bubblebug

New Blood
Joined
Jan 7, 2024
Messages
2
I'm a physician, graduated from the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (the best Medicine university of south Brazil) in 2014.
I have spent so far 3 years of studying and about U$ 100,000.00.
Furthermore, I have discovered the “Bubble bugs” (a.k.a. Sarcoptes scabiei), the Dirt itself, a living being, who creates the bubbles we see in liquids. That shiny spot at the center of the bubbles is, indeed, a mature Sarcoptes scabiei.
I have it all well documented at my TikTok account: @gzzn55.
You are all welcome to join me in this revolution of knowledge.
Dirt is alive! It is just the beginning…[IMGw=800]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20240213/9df877eecedd20b9a221eeea96c52c31.jpg[/IMGw]
A split sample after some time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You've discovered scabies?
You've discovered scabies in "dirt"?
Do you mean soil?
If you want to know how bubbles are created in liquid please send me money for a nice Cremant de Loire and I shall demonstrate how bubble formation is influenced by glass shape. It shall of course require replication.
 
"Discovered"..?

I think you're about 1200 years behind the curve:

In 1687, Bonomo and Cestoni described Sarcoptes mites as a cause of scabies, but the first author who accurately described the parasite was De Geer in 1778.
 
On the bright side, at least now we know the sign up process is working again now.
 
Gosh, who'd'a'thunk it?

Someone who's never heard of scabies mites and never heard of all the microbial and insect and wormy and crustacean and viral and fungal and whatever else life routinely found in soils.

Mate, Darwin wrote a whole lot about Lumbricus terrestris and its close relatives...I spent a load of time at university (Sheffield, the best university in the West Riding of Yorkshire and Leeds can sod off) looking at soils and what makes them up: there are good text books out there and I'm sure some of them are in Portuguese.

Nice try, but we will not support your scam.
 
Dirt is NOT alive as we now of what makes up life. Now dirt contains living stuff from worms down to and including bacteria. I'm not sure whether viruses live in dirt, but I would not be surprised. The is no conspiracy here.
 
Dirt is NOT alive as we now of what makes up life. Now dirt contains living stuff from worms down to and including bacteria. I'm not sure whether viruses live in dirt, but I would not be surprised. The is no conspiracy here.

I can recall an interesting conversation, where it was revealed that clay behaves as it was alive. It was a group of researchers who had been creating tests that can be carried on space probes, to determine if there was any life on objects like comets...

The problem that they kept running into, was that crystals and clay, both, tended to defeat the tests.

(i.e. exhibited 'growth' while being observed in a test sample.)

The whole 'self-replicating' molecule world is incredibly interesting.
 
You've discovered scabies?
You've discovered scabies in "dirt"?
Do you mean soil?
If you want to know how bubbles are created in liquid please send me money for a nice Cremant de Loire and I shall demonstrate how bubble formation is influenced by glass shape. It shall of course require replication.


Dirt itself is indeed the remains of these mites. Everything oficial to this matter is a great BS.
First take a look at a few examples I've posted on TikTok, then take some time studying it with a microscope. The easiest sample you can use is your own saliva. Take a look at what happens with its "bubbles" over a couple of hours.
Anything I'm bringing here needs any source of "believing". It's not that simple but it's not that hard either. Nothing I'm bringing here will be found on books or internet. Only you with the help of your own brain is capable of understanding it. So don't came here with some simple lines you read in a book to dismiss three years of studying. I'm no retard. At the age of 16 I already had an IQ of 161. I easily entered in the most difficult Medicine school in South Brazil, hence I graduated for free.
My best regards!
 
Is there a chance soil is fine mineral and dead organic material?

I am also very curious where a million US went in three years to come up with the answer you came up with.
 
Last edited:
Welcome, bubblebug.

Dirt is NOT alive as we now of what makes up life. Now dirt contains living stuff from worms down to and including bacteria. I'm not sure whether viruses live in dirt, but I would not be surprised. The is no conspiracy here.

Exactly. Dirt isn't alive, it just contains living organisms.

Do we need to define "living" for our new member?
 
In my experience, I have observed that TikTok is not the most reliable place to get scientific or medical information. Perhaps you should try submitting a paper to a reputable peer-reviewed journal with your findings?
 
Gosh, who'd'a'thunk it?

Someone who's never heard of scabies mites and never heard of all the microbial and insect and wormy and crustacean and viral and fungal and whatever else life routinely found in soils.

Another head-scratcher, this. Perhaps there is some sort of language issue here.

Kinda hard to say you discovered something new when it already has a scientific name.

Kinda hard to pretend you've never heard of it before or think that it's new when you already *know* the scientific name.

Kinda hard to believe that one just happened to find and recognize scabies mites without already knowing where they were commonly found.

As for scabies mites causing all bubbles? That's just loony toons.
 
I'm a physician, graduated from the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (the best Medicine university of south Brazil) in 2014.
I have spent so far 3 years of studying and about U$ 100,000.00.
Furthermore, I have discovered the “Bubble bugs” (a.k.a. Sarcoptes scabiei), the Dirt itself, a living being, who creates the bubbles we see in liquids. That shiny spot at the center of the bubbles is, indeed, a mature Sarcoptes scabiei.
I have it all well documented at my TikTok account: @gzzn55.
You are all welcome to join me in this revolution of knowledge.
Dirt is alive! It is just the beginning…[IMGw=800]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20240213/9df877eecedd20b9a221eeea96c52c31.jpg[/IMGw]
A split sample after some time.

Oh dear. :boggled:
 
Yeesh. Of all things.

Had a girlfriend who brought scabies home from a nursing home she worked at back in the day. Not fun.
 
I'd like to hear more about how all those clay minerals, sand particles, calcium carbonate, bits of basalt (yes, I've been to Iceland), granite, gneiss, dolerite and all and all which are to be found in soils (this is what is meant by dirt, isn't it?) is actually really, really alive.

We could be confounding a whole heap of much scientific knowledge and many, many Nobel prizes await!
 
Nothing I'm bringing here will be found on books or internet.

Surely as a medical student, having graduated from the most prestigious medical school in southern Brazil, you would have been taught the importance of consensus in and duplication of scientific claims, especially claims of a medical nature that might be dispositive of diagnosis and treatment. When you tell us that you and you alone are the source of this knowledge, and that TikTok is your chosen place to publish your findings—well, I'll be blunt: we don't believe you.

Only you with the help of your own brain is capable of understanding it.

That's not generally true of scientific claims. Usually you need a fair amount of study and experience in the relevant fields.

I'm no retard. At the age of 16 I already had an IQ of 161.

Since English may not be your native tongue, let me admonish you that your first sentence in this quote uses a word that many English speakers would consider derogatory and inappropriate.

I would expect a medical student to understand the limitations of I.Q. testing and the application of I.Q. test scores. High I.Q. is not a guarantee of correct reasoning in some specific case.

I easily entered in the most difficult Medicine school in South Brazil, hence I graduated for free.

This is relevant only if your school participated in some way in the research you are presenting. Did it sponsor and guide the research? Did it publish your findings? Otherwise we have to conclude that even eminent medical students may be susceptible to errors in scientific practice, without the appropriate institutional and industry review and consensus.
 
I can recall an interesting conversation, where it was revealed that clay behaves as it was alive. It was a group of researchers who had been creating tests that can be carried on space probes, to determine if there was any life on objects like comets...

The problem that they kept running into, was that crystals and clay, both, tended to defeat the tests.

(i.e. exhibited 'growth' while being observed in a test sample.)

The whole 'self-replicating' molecule world is incredibly interesting.

Growth is not a definition of life nor an attribute of only the living. Volcanoes grow, mountains grow clay tends to grow(swell) when associated with water, perhaps the scientists should redefine what are attributes of life that can be modelled and measured by instruments. If you remember that the Viking missions observed life on Mars until the scientists realized their models were looking at the wrong reactions of life. Dirt nor clay is alive.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom