alfaniner
Penultimate Amazing
I'm not sure about this statistic's implications. What is the "first panel"? Is it a smaller group of the 96? Or the entire bunch? How many have been excused? (My question is with CNN's chyron reporting, exactly as you stated.)
I think the danger is more in hidden Trump supporter lying, and getting on the jury, rather than someone who admits disliking him but claiming they can be fair.
Now clarified:
Sixty of 96 potential jurors were quick to say in the New York court that they could not be impartial.
Yeah, wow. I thought it was maybe they were doing groups of 10 or something, but this is very clear. I highly doubt that all the remaining ones are truly impartial, but that's for the lawyers to sniff out.
Posted By: jimbob
Last edited by a moderator: