Axxman300
Philosopher
At least iAs military operations go, it has been very special.
Were you Viet Cong or NVA?I was a soldier in Vietnam in 1966 where I was taught that if you don't declare war then it's not a war but only a conflict.
At least iAs military operations go, it has been very special.
Were you Viet Cong or NVA?I was a soldier in Vietnam in 1966 where I was taught that if you don't declare war then it's not a war but only a conflict.
Reminds me of the old joke: My grandfather downed twelve German bombers in World War 2. He was the worst mechanic in the Luftwaffe.At least i
Were you Viet Cong or NVA?
It has a long and proud (bless their hearts) tradition. The Germans tried to portray the invasion of Poland as a quick police action.Yes. It is a phrase to fool stupid people into thinking an unwarranted large scale invasion of a country is just some quick border dispute.
You were ordered to use a euphemism for the purposes of propaganda.I was a soldier in Vietnam in 1966 where I was taught that if you don't declare war then it's not a war but only a conflict.
No he wasn't*. And no such propaganda campaign ever existed.You were ordered to use a euphemism for the purposes of propaganda.
Well, I've been reading the contributions to this forum and honestly, really, truly my perspective does appear to be diverse.
I cannot possibly comment on that at all. Moscow media sources are completely censored here. So if my perspective is similar to that of Moscow's then it must be a miracle. How do you know so much about Moscow's perspective? If you have a link to their sources I'd be obliged if you could share it with me. I'd love to see what they have to say.
Please send me a link to those Moscow media sources and I'll take a look at it. I can't promise I'll find "an explanation" but maybe I can at least form an opinion and then we can discuss it.
I was a soldier in Vietnam in 1966 where I was taught that if you don't declare war then it's not a war but only a conflict.
He won't be able to answer, he doesn't speak Polish.Were you Viet Cong or NVA?
He could be Australian.In the light of this post:
If you served in Vietnam, then presumably you are American.
a cat that has somehow lost 2 of its paws and a couple teeth that mouse. I mean, I basically agree, Ukraine is the mouse to the tiger that was Russia, but we've found out that its a bit of a paper tiger haven't we. It's basically the equivalent of the US invading Canada losing more a few hundred thousand soldiers in 3 years. Shocking and heroic resistance from the Ukrainians.Putin is not everyone .......
..... Putin is the cat, Zoolinsky is the mouse.
The ass has been kicked when the last shot has been fired and the terms have been set.
Or ROKHe could be Australian.
I can access Russia Today International.Is Russian media censored in Australia? I lived in Seoul for 2 years, and I'm pretty sure it isn't censored there.
I can access Russia Today International.
I can remember as a kid watching MASH, they made ironic reference to the Korean war being a "police action" rather than a war.Funny, I served a short, unheroic hitch in the armies of Lyndon Johnson in 66-67, and all I heard about was "the Korean conflict." WW2 and Nam were wars right enough.
When Clutch gets out of the stockade, he'll have a chance to straighten us all up about it.
If Putin hasn't "invaded Ukraine", how would you describe it?I maintain that Putin has not "invaded Ukraine" so the truth has yet to be presented. The MSM is not the go-to source of truth in any way, shape, or form. If you are willing to discuss whether or not Putin “invaded Ukraine” ….. fine. Cool.
Putin isn't interested in taking Ukraine. Hitler claimed he only wanted to "liberate" the ethnic Germans in Sudetenland but then he promptly took all of Czechoslovakia. Putin made the same claim about the ethnic Russians in Donbas and that is all he did until the Nazi Azov (backed by the Fascist political coup government) made it necessary for the Russians to temporality increase the zone of liberation. If you call it an ”invasion” you are free to do that and I am not bothered. But when the general spin calls it ”a full scale invasion” of the whole of Ukraine then that is what I call a bold faced lie.If Putin hasn't "invaded Ukraine", how would you describe it?
"Reclaimed parts of Ukraine"?
Or maybe you believe Putin's army first attacked parts of Ukraine in 2022 without Putin's orders?
Thank you for clarifying.Putin isn't interested in taking Ukraine. Hitler claimed he only wanted to "liberate" the ethnic Germans in Sudetenland but then he promptly took all of Czechoslovakia. Putin made the same claim about the ethnic Russians in Donbas and that is all he did until the Nazi Azov (backed by the Fascist political coup government) made it necessary for the Russians to temporality increase the zone of liberation. If you call it an ”invasion” you are free to do that and I am not bothered. But when the general spin calls it ”a full scale invasion” of the whole of Ukraine then that is what I call a bold faced lie.
Any time.Thank you for clarifying.
Yes.The Azov Brigade were indeed neo-nazi paramilitaries.
No, I don't realize that and I doubt it. But link me up to find out.You do realise that they were wiped out in the first few months of the war?
Dispersed, not wiped out at all.The Azov Brigade were indeed neo-nazi paramilitaries. You do realise that they were wiped out in the first few months of the war?
Yes.
No, I don't realize that and I doubt it. But link me up to find out.
The survivors of the Siege of Mariupol surrendered to Russian troops and were captured.Dispersed, not wiped out at all.
![]()
Azov Brigade - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Siege of Mariupol - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It's not too hard to find out what happened to them.
The survivors of the Siege of Mariupol surrendered to Russian troops and were captured.
After the siege ended, a couple of units of the SSO formed up called "Azov SSO" but they were incorporated into the Ukrainian Ground Forces in 2023. A few veterans have joined or formed new volunteer units, but the Azov Brigade that Putin used as an excuse to invade essentially no longer exists.
And again, the alleged US-backed "nazi coup" is direct propaganda via an article in a German newspaper written by Putin himself. It has no basis in fact.
Okay, let's say "all but" wiped out.So we agree that they were dispersed.
Maybe. It's a convenient narrative, and pretty hard to prove either way. They were an uncomfortable reality for Zelensky.Okay, let's say "all but" wiped out.
And like I said, Putin's excuse for invading. But however you cut it, the Azov Brigade did not survive Mariupol. Are there survivors of the siege still alive? Yes, a few. But Putin's so-called "special military operation" was specifically in order to counter neo-nazi paramilitary groups in Donbas, of which there was, essentially, exactly one. What has Russia been doing for the last three years?Maybe. It's a convenient narrative, and pretty hard to prove either way. They were an uncomfortable reality for Zelensky.
I'm not attempting to defend or justify Putin's motives. Azov were not the only openly Nazi brigade at all. They were just the most visible.And like I said, Putin's excuse for invading. But however you cut it, the Azov Brigade did not survive Mariupol. Are there survivors of the siege still alive? Yes, a few. But Putin's so-called "special military operation" was specifically in order to counter neo-nazi paramilitary groups in Donbas, of which there was, essentially, exactly one. What has Russia been doing for the last three years?
You think it's irrational to staunchly support a country that is invaded by its neighbour and fighting for its survival against a foreign aggressor?I'm not attempting to defend or justify Putin's motives. Azov were not the only openly Nazi brigade at all. They were just the most visible.
I have no dog in this fight mate. I think staunchly supporting either side is irrational.
It's "Strava"Slava Ukraini!
![]()
Maybe.The survivors of the Siege of Mariupol surrendered to Russian troops and were captured.
OK.After the siege ended, a couple of units of the SSO formed up called "Azov SSO"
OK.but they were incorporated into the Ukrainian Ground Forces in 2023.
OK.A few veterans have joined or formed new volunteer units,
How is your English? How are you using the term "an excuse"? It is clear to me that you are contradicting yourslf ..... your very own words.but the Azov Brigade that Putin used as an excuse to invade essentially no longer exists.
Take it up with Victoria Nuland.And again, the alleged US-backed "nazi coup" is direct propaganda via an article in a German newspaper written by Putin himself. It has no basis in fact.
That is - and has been - Putin's stance from the very start of his Special Military Operation. Personally, I think calling it a Special Military Operation is a side-step but Putin didn't concoct it. The US invented it and they got away with it. "Follow the leader"? The development of the war (or is that only a "conflict"?) supports Putin's goal/intentions. There is no reason or example of his performance so far that contradicts his word...... Putin's so-called "special military operation" was specifically in order to counter neo-nazi paramilitary groups in Donbas,
You need to supplement your MSM diet with something more realistic. If you do that you can begin to ask yourself many questions and find answers that will be based in logic and (hopefull) fact, and .......... you can come to the next debate with something more insightful than "Putin bad - Zoolinsky good"...... What has Russia been doing for the last three years?
Yes, making the referendums of Donetsk and Luhansk a necessity.Genocide against it's own citizens?
I can teach you a few lessons about both Sweden and Denmark but your post/contribution is much more balanced and non-biased than most of the crap I've seen in decades so I'll just take my hat off to you and say, "A very good effort from you."CC must be thinking of Sweden:
A country that committed genocide against its own citizens for a decade? A country that was infiltrated and manipulated by US and NATO skulduggery? A country who celebrated it's Nazism?
Yes, I think it's irrational to unconditionally support them.
This is in no way an endorsement of Putin's invasion.
Are you aware of how the LGBT community are treated by the Ukrainian government?
Wokeism is a religion. Suspension of rational thinking appears to be a prerequisite. Gays for Palestine much?