Why are you constantly arguing in circles? How many times do I have to tell you that it depends on how the legal system deals with crypto compared with other assets/property?
Where property could be recovered from the scammer, the legal system would generally order its return. If the scammer fails to comply with such an order, the legal system would generally have remedies for that situation depending on whether the property could be forcibly removed from the scammer or not.
I feel like I'm arguing in circles because my point isn't ever being addressed. What is there for when it's easy to prevent the property being forcibly removed from the scammer, as is the case with crypto?
Well if that was an attempt to clarify a question, I failed miserably at understanding it
Because it is hard to compel people to give up their ill gotten gains and there is nothing physical some armed men can forcibly take away.
I get scammed on my credit card I call my bank and tell them that and they reverse the transaction, I am not dependant of forcing the scammer to reverse the transaction.
Why read the answer to a question then ask the very same question again?I feel like I'm arguing in circles because my point isn't ever being addressed. What is there for when it's easy to prevent the property being forcibly removed from the scammer, as is the case with crypto?
That is not necessarily guaranteed otherwise phishing scams would not be at an all time high. Where reversibility is a possiblility, GOTO 3759.I get scammed on my credit card I call my bank and tell them that and they reverse the transaction, I am not dependant of forcing the scammer to reverse the transaction.
You have no idea.Phishing scams are at an all time high because scammers can now use crypto rather than traditional means.
Why read the answer to a question then ask the very same question again?
That is not necessarily guaranteed otherwise phishing scams would not be at an all time high. Where reversibility is a possiblility, GOTO 3759.
You didn't say that. You just re-asked the question as though it was never answered at all.Because I think the answer didn't resolve my question.
Only if the money is still there and only if you can convince your bank that this was a fraudulent transaction. In many cases the money is long gone and your bank can't do anything about it.My bank can refund me a fraudulent charge even if the scammer took their money overseas.
Dealt with comprehensively 10 years ago.but that’s different than with crypto where they literally cannot reverse the transaction under any circumstances without access to the wallet. like if crypto was mistakenly sent to a dead wallet it’s simply forever gone.
Banks here are very flexible about repaying fraud.Because I think the answer didn't resolve my question.
My bank can refund me a fraudulent charge even if the scammer took their money overseas.
Maybe you should run along and tell all of the victims of phishing scams that we see on the news that they don't have to worry. The bank will get their money back.Banks here are very flexible about repaying fraud.
Dealt with comprehensively 10 years ago.
Yes I appreciate your discernment.Samson's predictions are basically an art form now ..
Samson's predictions are basically an art form now ..
ftfy.14k is the maximum targetnowin the far distant unspecified future.
14k is the maximum target now.
Tulip bulbs are still sold at farmers markets.
The problem with crypto is you can't hold them in your hand.
The most miserable brand in history.
14k is the maximum target now.
Tulip bulbs are still sold at farmers markets.
The problem with crypto is you can't hold them in your hand.
The most miserable brand in history.
I watch Michael Saylor.Is there an expiration on this "prediction", or is it in-perpetuity?
I watch Michael Saylor.
Somehow he managed to buy 18000 bitcoin at 64650 on September 3, which is higher than the market traded, lifting his average price to 38k. A year ago it was less than 30k.
He predicts 10 million per "coin" in 20 years, when he would be a sprightly mid 70s.
He always talks limited supply, but never addresses the 20k other coins, or that anyone can clone bitcoin for infinite supply. Give me a gold adjacent element on the periodic table with your own brand spanking new big bang I would suggest to him.
The above numbers are from memory, but roughly true I think..
he bought over a billion dollar's worth?
Is it time to remind you of your dishonesty again?He always talks limited supply, but never addresses the 20k other coins, or that anyone can clone bitcoin for infinite supply.
I have no dog in the fight, Ethereum looks vulnerable to a major downtrend, but this can't happen without bitcoin in tandem.
ftfy.I have no dog in the fight, Ethereum looks vulnerable to a major downtrend, but this can't happen without bitcoin in tandem.
I don't know butI see a completely different paradigm between the periodic table and the crypto table.I am going to pretend yet again that nobody has explained that the existence of alternatives to bitcoin doesn't increase they supply of bitcoin.
The advice to would be crypto investors is the same as it always has been for other would be investors: Anybody who claims that they can consistently beat the market average for returns (or can "guarantee" a fast profit) should be regarded as a scammer.FBI's Cryptocurrency fraud report for 2023 just came out:
https://www.ic3.gov/Media/PDF/AnnualReport/2023_IC3CryptocurrencyReport.pdf
As the use of cryptocurrency in the global financial system continues to grow, so too does its use by criminal actors. In 2023, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) received more than 69,000 complaints from the public regarding financial fraud involving the use of cryptocurrency, such as bitcoin, ether, or tether. Estimated losses with a nexus to cryptocurrency totaled more than $5.6 billion. While the number of cryptocurrency-related complaints represents only about 10 percent of the total number of financial fraud complaints, the losses associated with these complaints account for almost 50 percent of the total losses.
Yeah, it's an early crypto spring. Here's a short piece:Saw a headline that bitcoin has surged to a new record above $75 k as crypto investors root for Trump victory.
ETA: basically up $5,000 in a day.
Moreno’s victory means the Senate will be controlled by Republicans in 2025, spurring optimism that pro-crypto legislation could be possible in Washington, D.C.
Trump has promised to fire Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler, one of the industry’s greatest antagonists. He has also pledged to appoint a crypto presidential advisory council and establish a "strategic national bitcoin stockpile" with the help of Congress.
I don't understand this moral objection to gambling on crypto. Do you also consider it unethical to gamble at the casino or bet on horses/sporting events?If I'd been super cynical I'd have bought some bitcoin as soon as Trump's victory was called, then sell it a little while later.
But I do not consider it ethical to participate in that market.
Fair enough.For me it's not a gambling issue. If you recall I find the technology and process unnecessarily wasteful of energy. The "mining" involved is basically competing to see who can burn the most electricity for longest to zero constructive purpose, and I'm not incentivizing that by becoming part of the demand.
The same is true of internet based scams as a whole. I doubt that btc has increased the number of scams - just increased the variety of scams.plus there's also the fact that when it's not wasting tons of electricity to fuel gambling there's the constant stream of scams