I have seen that each side accuses the other of self-righteousness. Because of that, I try to be open minded to their issues. I like to think of myself as open minded.
I really tried at the beginning of my research into this case to be open that Knox and Sollecito could be guilty. I don't detect open mindedness on the guilt-side.
I've come to the conclusion that the confirmation bias started 4 days after the crime before the DNA had been processed, and it never stopped.
I posted here once - I tried presenting a list of what the guilters believe all in one place, to try to start a dialog. But it got too difficult with the way the threads quote from the prior one.
It's here http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=6072459&postcount=2755
I don't have the brain power of you or the other excellent posters!
Thanks for all your effort!
I really tried at the beginning of my research into this case to be open that Knox and Sollecito could be guilty. I don't detect open mindedness on the guilt-side.
I've come to the conclusion that the confirmation bias started 4 days after the crime before the DNA had been processed, and it never stopped.
I posted here once - I tried presenting a list of what the guilters believe all in one place, to try to start a dialog. But it got too difficult with the way the threads quote from the prior one.
It's here http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=6072459&postcount=2755
I don't have the brain power of you or the other excellent posters!
Thanks for all your effort!