kmortis

I'm pretty sure I accidentally posted the same response about half a dozen times before realizing the thread was moderated. It hasn't appeared yet. Sorry!

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=349560

YOUR AUTO MOD

moved my thread
move it back where I put in in current events

and do not move my threads without prior discussion with me

I note that you edited a post of mine for supposed "copyright" reasons. The material is from the London Gazette, a British government publication that is Crown Copyright, which is therefore free to use - even in its entirety - with attribution (which I did).

Hi, did you move my fuelair thread from FM? If so, can you explain why. There have been similar threads there, particularly as this one was also about rule 9. Have I missed something? Sorry if I have.

Hello, kmortis.

I see that you edited my post to remove the claim that logger was "full of ****" when he said something. Sorry if this crossed the line, but I intended to say that what he said was obviously false, and so was responding to content, not the poster (crassly, admittedly).

I'm having trouble finding the rules (I thought that "rule 12" would link to rule 12, but it doesn't seem to -- or my browser is flaky), but I assume that you dinged me for attacking the poster?

Hey, I noticed that a couple of post were edited by you. I was trying to find out what I said that was in opposition to rules
Thanks

Your moderating confuses me.

A user called Saggy has repeatedly refused to answer questions about two Holocaust witnesses (Krzepicki and Rabinowicz). I finally wrote, to make clear why I think he's ducking, "Krzepicki. Rabinowicz. You're a coward, Saggy. Sad!" You edited my post. Good grief.

This same user frequently refers to me and others posting in the forum, based on nothing, as paid agents of Israel (hasbara trolls). You do nothing.

I am not sure why in the one instance drawing a conclusion about a member's behavior in refusing discussion - on a point he invited, mind you - gets edited but insults, ad hominems, and conspiracy theorizing with regard to other members by Saggy is permitted.

Frankly, I can't fathom the standard at work with your moderating.

Lemmy Caution

Hello, kmortis.

You edited my post for a rule 0 violation. With due respect, I didn't insult the poster. I pointed out a quite clear consequence of his own words. He doesn't know what a parsing rule is about, and he doesn't understand the meaning of "meaningless" (a slight irony, to be sure).

I bloody well stand by the post. It's not particularly friendly, but it's completely apt.

Thanks for your consideration.

Really? With due respect and I understand that you're a moderator, but what did I say regarding applecorped's post that passed the boundary? I'll appreciate any explanation you can give me. Thanks.

Going to TAM this year? Denise and I are.

kmortis,

You removed a post of mine this morning for "previously moderated material" or some such. Here is the message you sent:
-----
Post:

kmortis, I recently came across an excellent website debunking the various JFK assassination conspiracy theories. Perhaps you could give it a mention in the appropriate section of the Forums? Here it is:

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

Thanks!

Alice Shortcake

Gee, I thought I was actually letting him off easy.

Happy birthday!!

You can really never go wrong with Ebert. I don't always agree with him, but he's a talented enough writer that he's fun to read.

A review that you might enjoy:

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110105/REVIEWS/110109993

Thanks!

Happy birthday!!!!!

Happy birthday!