The one difference between this piece and the latest from Harry Rag, is that it is in principle possible to find out who Michael Mills is. Mills' thesis is, in principle, unknowable, but it is explanatory as to why (as he points out) Italy has not gone after Amanda Knox (and probably won't) and has only confiscated Sollecito's passport, not detained him precauntionarily.
BTW - has anyone found Edward McCall's bona fides yet? Andrea Vogt and Machiavelli sing off of his song sheet.
http://www.allthingscrimeblog.com/2014/04/11/how-politics-knock-on-amanda-knox/
It seems this case has long since not been about the evidence, and really hasn't been about Knox and/or Sollecito other than which side the Sollecito's writ large are on in the larger internal political struggle in Italy.
It's clear which side Machiavelli is on, when he posts here.
One thing is sure, CoulsdonUK will be critical of the Italian Supreme Court, because Meredith's memory is way, way, way down the list of things which are important to them.