Someone said the WC said nothing about Eugene Brading's presence in Dealey Plaza during and after the shooting. In point of fact, the fact that Brading, aka Jim Braden, was in the Dal-Tex Building and was arrested afterward is documented in 19 WCH 469, 527 (or Decker Exhibit 5323). The HSCA also noted that Brading/Braden was detained in Dealey Plaza (9 HSCA 424).
One of the best discussions on Brading/Braden and his activities before, during, and after the assassination can be found in Contract on America: The Mafia Murder of President John F. Kennedy, pp. 45-47, by Dr. David Scheim (Ph.D. in mathematics from MIT). FYI, former HSCA chief counsel G. Robert Blakely endorsed Scheim's book.
And 50 years later, what evidence has been developed that indicates Braden / Brading was part of a conspiracy and not just a guy in the wrong place at the wrong time?
Was a weapon located in the Dal-Tex building traceable to Brading?
Or traceable to anyone?
Or even not traceable?
Was any weapon found in the Dal-Tex building?
Were shells found located in a window facing the motorcade route?
Did any witnesses see a gunman in the Dal-Tex building and point him out to police?
Were Brading's fingerprints found on items in a window facing the motorcade route?
Did Brading resist arrest when approached by a police officer?
Did he give a reasonable account of why he was in the building?
Now, do note that this evidence does point to Oswald:
A weapon located in the TSBD was traceable to Oswald.
Numerous witnesses saw a young white male with a rifle in the sixth floor SE corner window of the TSBD and reported that to police after the assassination.
Shells located in the 6th floor SE corner TSBD window was traceable to Oswald's weapon
His prints were located on the rifle.
His prints were found on boxes in the 6th floor SE corner TSBD window.
Oswald resisted arrest when approached by Officer McDonald in the Texas Theatre, punching him in the face and drawing his weapon on McDonald.
Oswald could not give a reasonable account of the evidence accumulated against him - denying facts in custody that the police had already determined to be true (like transporting a long package to work on the back seat of Wes Frazier's car that morning).
Unless you can do more than snip at the heels of that evidence, you lose. Mentioning Braden / Brading is simply a deflection, you have no evidence he was involved in the assassination whatsoever, so you attempt to close that very wide chasm by speculation.
That won't do.
Hank