One thing more that does not belong to the court findings.
The prints simply do not match. The only one that is useful for probable identity is the one in Amanda's room and the second toe does not match,
You are wrong. It's true that there is a drop which you can identify with a second toe which does not match - this is one thing that actually, visually
does not match with the second toe in Knox's print, contrarily to the other shenanigans and mincing "findings" by Bill Williams & c. I consider this as a serious argument. However, this argument is not sufficient, not comparable to the set of information which allows to attribute the footprints. However, I was saying, you are wrong on one thing: that the one in Knox's room is the only useful one. In fact, also the prints in the corridoor are useful. In particular, one can be attributed to an individual whose foot is compatible with Sollecito, and another print (n.7) was also found to be a probable identity with Knox.
Thus, there are two probable identities wit Knox and one probable identity with Sollecito in the luminol prints.
Plus, there is a probable identity with Sollecito on the bathmat print.
something that is glaringly obvious yet Rinaldi did not even address in his report.
And neither the defence questioned him, did them?
Most of the Luminol prints are blobs and establishing probable identity based on blobs is stupid.
They are also reactive to luminol, they are unusual since they are human bare foots wet in a mysterious substance, they have a very peculiar distribution in the house, they have a very peculiar and striking analogy with some bloody bare footprints in diluted blood on a bathmat (certainly related to the crime), they are found together with other luminol stains with peculiar features (a shoprint from the Guede shoeprint track which was cleaned, yielding a mixture of Meredith+Knox DNA), other luminol stains in Filomena's room, also yielding a very remarkable mixture of Knox+Meredith's DNA; and the prints compatible Knox also have Knox's DNA.
Moreover, thse were found in a context where there are towels soaked with blood, which were used to wipe the floor, and there is also a tale about someone showering and then shuffling a rag or a mat across the corridor.
Rinaldi is a biased non-expert who works for the cops,
He "works for the cops", what an ugly thing.
he is educated as an engineer and could not even explain where some of his measurements came from.
Rinaldi has a degree in physics (he was a student in Bologna when I was) and is specialized in forensically applied physics.
Another lying liar and cheating cheater, just like Stefanoni.
Of course, like all people you don't like. They are all very ugly.
