Let me continue to make my position clear that it was the Fall of the Jewish Temple of God c 70 CE that triggered the Jesus story which eventually became the basis of a New Religion.
Based on the writings of Josephus, Tacitus and Suetonius the Jews expected Jewish Messianic rulers sometime around the Jewish War against the Romans c 66-70 CE which was supposedly predicted in Hebrew Scripture.
This suggests that the Predicted Jewish Messianic ruler/rulers had not been revealed up to c 66-70 CE. Essentially, there was no Messianic ruler known to the Jews up to c 66-70 CE.
Apologetic writers for hundreds of years and after Josephus, Tacitus and Suetonius would confirm that the Jews did NOT acknowledge any Jewish Messianic ruler in the 1st century or at the time of Pilate.
The Dead Sea Scrolls also show that Jewish writings did not acknowledge an actual advent of a PREDICTED Jewish Messianic ruler.
1. All Jewish writings which appear to mention the story of Jesus are no earlier than the 2nd century.
2. All non-Apologetic writings which appear to mention the story of Jesus are no earlier than the 2nd century.
3. All recovered and dated manuscripts which appear to mention the story of Jesus are no earlier than the 2nd century.
4. All the Gospels in the NT are forgeries with Fake 1st century writers.
5. No 2nd century manuscripts of the Jesus story has been found in the Hebrew language.
6. No 2nd century manuscripts of the Jesus story was found in Galilee or Jerusalem.
7. Arguments AGAINST the Jesus story and cult are no earlier than the 2nd century.
8. Arguments BY CHRISTIANS about the NATURE of Jesus are NO earlier then the 2nd century.
The picture is quite clear.
The abundance of evidence overwhelmingly suggest that the Jesus story did not originate among the Jews and was unknown in Galilee and Jerusalem and was most likely initiated in the 2nd century.
The pattern of forgeries in the NT Canon is easy to detect.
1. All the supposed authors of the NT were either relatives of the unknown Jesus, hand-picked followers of the unknown Jesus or their acquaintances.
2. None of the authors of the NT has ever been located outside the NT and Apologetics.
3. Up to 180 CE, some Apologetic and non-Apologetic writers do not mention, acknowledge or do not associate Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, Peter, James and Jude with the direct composition of any specific Gospel or Epistle.
The more we examine the evidence it is quite clear that the NT and Jesus story is a product of the 2nd century and later.
Based on the writings of Josephus, Tacitus and Suetonius the Jews expected Jewish Messianic rulers sometime around the Jewish War against the Romans c 66-70 CE which was supposedly predicted in Hebrew Scripture.
This suggests that the Predicted Jewish Messianic ruler/rulers had not been revealed up to c 66-70 CE. Essentially, there was no Messianic ruler known to the Jews up to c 66-70 CE.
Apologetic writers for hundreds of years and after Josephus, Tacitus and Suetonius would confirm that the Jews did NOT acknowledge any Jewish Messianic ruler in the 1st century or at the time of Pilate.
The Dead Sea Scrolls also show that Jewish writings did not acknowledge an actual advent of a PREDICTED Jewish Messianic ruler.
1. All Jewish writings which appear to mention the story of Jesus are no earlier than the 2nd century.
2. All non-Apologetic writings which appear to mention the story of Jesus are no earlier than the 2nd century.
3. All recovered and dated manuscripts which appear to mention the story of Jesus are no earlier than the 2nd century.
4. All the Gospels in the NT are forgeries with Fake 1st century writers.
5. No 2nd century manuscripts of the Jesus story has been found in the Hebrew language.
6. No 2nd century manuscripts of the Jesus story was found in Galilee or Jerusalem.
7. Arguments AGAINST the Jesus story and cult are no earlier than the 2nd century.
8. Arguments BY CHRISTIANS about the NATURE of Jesus are NO earlier then the 2nd century.
The picture is quite clear.
The abundance of evidence overwhelmingly suggest that the Jesus story did not originate among the Jews and was unknown in Galilee and Jerusalem and was most likely initiated in the 2nd century.
The pattern of forgeries in the NT Canon is easy to detect.
1. All the supposed authors of the NT were either relatives of the unknown Jesus, hand-picked followers of the unknown Jesus or their acquaintances.
2. None of the authors of the NT has ever been located outside the NT and Apologetics.
3. Up to 180 CE, some Apologetic and non-Apologetic writers do not mention, acknowledge or do not associate Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, Peter, James and Jude with the direct composition of any specific Gospel or Epistle.
The more we examine the evidence it is quite clear that the NT and Jesus story is a product of the 2nd century and later.
Last edited: