Gift us with December Stundie Nominations

From the same DIF thread about the Chinese landing.
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061890499&postcount=123
man has never been on the moon..1969 was a clear obvious hoax. For example, the moon has no atmosphere so the dust from Rover driving would go straight up in to the air but it doesn't and comes straight back down like it only can do being on earth. The atmosphere is the resistance
Because, you know, gravity has nothing to do with how the dust moves. :rolleyes:
 
man has never been on the moon..1969 was a clear obvious hoax. For example, the moon has no atmosphere so the dust from Rover driving would go straight up in to the air but it doesn't and comes straight back down like it only can do being on earth. The atmosphere is the resistance
As I was going up the stairs
I met a man who wasn't there...
 
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061890519&postcount=126

"If this was light from the Sun...surely the sky would not be jet black? Its never black on Earth when the sun is shining or giving light

This is so obvious spotlights in a studio...The natural light would also cover the whole area we see but it only seems to cover the rover. And no stars?"



I'm seconding this nomination, particularly for the bolded part, as this post includes a photo where you can see all the way to the horizon.
 
We should have known the Chinese Moon Landing would produce a tide of new Stundies.

In the Recursive Stundie category, here's lobuk, when asked to define "real evidence":


Originally Posted by juan diez
Refresh my mind if you will, what would you class as real evidence?

Sure.


Originally Posted by lobuk View Post
Whole thing stinks of pure propaganda to me and as far as i am concerned, that is exactly what it is until real evidence and proof is given. What we have seen so far doesn't even come close to proof. It is more about faith than evidence. Still amazes me how people are so willing to trust main stream sources when they have been shown time and time again to lie and manipulate practically everything that they do.


Originally Posted by lobuk View Post
Real evidence and if and when that comes then i will look at it with unbias and discernment and if i feels it is genuine, then great i will be the first to say that it looks genuine. There is no way can that be done yet but i will continue to watch with interest. Until then, it is pure propaganda and people should always question everything, especially when faith based and from unreliable sources.

Originally Posted by lobuk View Post
Already told you twice. A lot more than what has been shown so far. What has been shown so far doesn't even come close to real evidence and if you think it does, then you are taking on beliefs based upon faith and from very unreliable sources.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061885285&postcount=55

"Real evidence" is evidence that will convince him; so if he's not convinced, it's not real.
 
I'm seconding this nomination, particularly for the bolded part, as this post includes a photo where you can see all the way to the horizon.
And I'm thirding it, because the same guy (cosmo99) who understands that there is no atmosphere on the Moon in one post forgets that in the next when he's wondering why the "sky [is] jet black" there- even after, in the same post, contrasting the sky on the Moon with the sky on Earth and emphasizing the obvious difference.

I have a feeling, though, that an explanation of Rayleigh Scattering would get something like "yeah, right!"
 
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061890519&postcount=126

"If this was light from the Sun...surely the sky would not be jet black? Its never black on Earth when the sun is shining or giving light

This is so obvious spotlights in a studio...The natural light would also cover the whole area we see but it only seems to cover the rover. And no stars?"

Love it!

So he compares how the sun looks on earth and expects the same sky on the moon, he also wonders why there are no stars when the sun is shining. The Earth is hoax, there are no stars in the day time!

There is just so much wrong going on in so many ways in so few words. I'm definitely gonna vote for that one.
 
Last edited:
And I'm thirding it, because the same guy (cosmo99) who understands that there is no atmosphere on the Moon in one post forgets that in the next when he's wondering why the "sky [is] jet black" there- even after, in the same post, contrasting the sky on the Moon with the sky on Earth and emphasizing the obvious difference.

I have a feeling, though, that an explanation of Rayleigh Scattering would get something like "yeah, right!"

Yeah right, the guy who invented cigarettes knows so much about the moon! Hah!
 
Mass shooters are liberals:
http://vault-co.blogspot.com/2013/12/almost-all-mass-shooters-invariably.html

Almost All Mass Shooters Invariably Left-Wing Occultists

It's true, whatever that really means. You would be hard pressed to find a single conservative involved in a mass shooting in the past 100 years.

Leftists have a problem with impulse control and gauging outcomes because they have damaged, stunted amygdalas at the core of their brain. Despite their efforts to paint the world differently, they are the ones who are the most likely to lack compassion for their victims. If they encourage the government to steal from strangers to give to others they deem more deserving, what on earth makes you think they would feel anything for their victims when they go on a murder spree? Leftists are cruel, nasty envious people who pretend to be beautiful altruists on the surface. They are no such thing. The evidence says they are something else altogether.
 
http://fxn.ws/1bUm0ym

It was a FREE COUNTRY with FREE SPEECH till all of those Gays,Atheist,Liberals,Lawyers,Hollywood Elite and the Slaves of the Socialist Progressive Democrats along with this Crap of a President came along and started BULLYING EVERYONE ELSE that their way of Life is the Only way of Life.

I love it. It's just a huge burst of incoherent anger.
 
Apparently cat litter is too heavy to lift out of the trunk of your car.
Clayton Moore said:
Are you still pretending it's somehow "impossible" for Lanza to have walked while carrying a rifle, two pistols and some ammo?

M16 = 8 pounds.
Pistol = 2 pounds each
100 rounds = 3 pounds

If he were carrying 1,000 rounds his load would only total 42 pounds. My 16 year old son carries nearly that much in school books every day.

Yeah sure. Pick up a 40 lb. box of kitty litter sometime.
 
Is there a special Stundie. A kind of 'lifetime underachievement' or 'for services rendered to stupidity"?

I'd like to nominate DIF's felixfelix for just such an honour, because it's difficult to describe just how stupid his stupid is. "Stupid is as stupid does" doesn't come close.

I give you everything he has ever posted ever in the Glasgow helicopter crash thread and Apollo theatre roof collapse thread:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=264017

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=262489

Both threads have people who are (indirectly) involved in the incidents that directly contradict everything he says, and both of which have him posting numerous photographs and screengrabs and then stating that what is in the photographs isn't (the photographs of the very dusty Apollo theatre where he denies there is dust are great).

His services to idiots everywhere needs extra recognition.

Truly, truly special.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom