• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

Mikeys said:
No one edited anything. A bunch of clowns made a bad res flick and played you. 10 years later they showed you high res photos and video clips. Amen
Click to expand...

Actually someone showed you a bad res video and told you its was a true and honest rendering of events and you fell for it.
In one clip that was on a truther website years ago we were to believe that the lo-res video showed a 'nose out' when in the very same clip Al Roker is on screen and the resolution is so bad his face is an amorphorous tan blob.:jaw-dropp The cognitive dissonance that such fanatical belief requires is utterly mind boggling.
 
jaydeehess said:
Actually someone showed you a bad res video and told you its was a true and honest rendering of events and you fell for it.
Click to expand...
That makes sense. So, what happened to the high res live video? Nobody saw it. I didn't. Why not just link to it? I for sure can't be certain the video claimed to come via media archives is the one showed on 911. Why media stores obscure videos and post them as real while hiding the real real ones. I wasn't recording that day. It's been 12 years. What are the reasons to keep the high res goodies hidden? Conversely, why the bad video has not been yet disproved? Clear amateur videos were showed after 10 years, why not the original high res video. You have a tea total fake video that shows stuff that could not have happened in reality.
 
Mikeys said:
That makes sense. So, what happened to the high res live video? Nobody saw it. I didn't. Why not just link to it? I for sure can't be certain the video claimed to come via media archives is the one showed on 911. Why media stores obscure videos and post them as real while hiding the real real ones. I wasn't recording that day. It's been 12 years. What are the reasons to keep the high res goodies hidden? Conversely, why the bad video has not been yet disproved? Clear amateur videos were showed after 10 years, why not the original high res video. You have a tea total fake video that shows stuff that could not have happened in reality.
Click to expand...

It's teetotal and it means abstaining from alcohol. How can we take you seriously?
 
Mikeys said:
That makes sense. So, what happened to the high res live video?
Click to expand...

What standard of live video broadcast was available in 2001?

Nobody saw it.
Click to expand...

Got proof of that?

I didn't.
Click to expand...

Then you are in no position to comment on it.

Why not just link to it? I for sure can't be certain the video claimed to come via media archives is the one showed on 911.
Click to expand...

And yet you claim authoritatively that it is not.

Why media stores obscure videos and post them as real while hiding the real real ones.
Click to expand...

Got proof of that?

I wasn't recording that day.
Click to expand...

So you have no standard by which to compare the images of those that were.

It's been 12 years. What are the reasons to keep the high res goodies hidden?
Click to expand...

Prove there is any higher res footage than that which exists.

Conversely, why the bad video has not been yet disproved?
Click to expand...

Because it is genuine? Crazy I know...

Clear amateur videos were showed after 10 years, why not the original high res video.
Click to expand...

See my first question. You weren't recording, seemingly didn't see it on TV, yet can somehow claim with authority that there is high definition video available. Where? Who has it? Who filmed it? With what? Who broadcast it?

have a tea total fake video that shows stuff that could not have happened in reality.
Click to expand...

Garbage.
 
threadworm said:
See my first question. You weren't recording, seemingly didn't see it on TV, yet can somehow claim with authority that there is high definition video available. Where? Who has it? Who filmed it? With what? Who broadcast it?
Click to expand...

As I said earlier, those details will be revealed when Mikeys gives us his full theory. If he wants to change my mind then the only way to do it is with evidence. Mikeys, the floor is yours.
 
Mikeys said:
That makes sense. So, what happened to the high res live video? Nobody saw it. I didn't. Why not just link to it? I for sure can't be certain the video claimed to come via media archives is the one showed on 911. Why media stores obscure videos and post them as real while hiding the real real ones. I wasn't recording that day. It's been 12 years. What are the reasons to keep the high res goodies hidden? Conversely, why the bad video has not been yet disproved? Clear amateur videos were showed after 10 years, why not the original high res video. You have a tea total fake video that shows stuff that could not have happened in reality.
Click to expand...

I saw the original broadcast from NBC that day. I wasn't recording either. Had no notion I would be called upon to produce it later. What is obvious of the video posted on the truther site was that it was several generations of compression. Why was it that the truth site felt it was impossible to transfer from their original to a form usable on the website without compressing it half a dozen times. It had to be either incompetence on their part or deliberate.
No one on this side of the debate needs the NBC original footage to know that planes hit the building, and IF any no-planer truther organization has bothered to request it in the last decade , NBC probably doesn't want to deal with unbalanced people.

BTW wtf do you think ' tea total' means? I think it means you proved how intelligent you are.
 
Last edited:
I suppose this means that Al Roker doesn't exist either, or at the very least wasn't working on 9/11. After all in the video 'proving' nose out on the site I visited, I only inferred it was he because of his voice and general shape and mannerisms
 
jaydeehess said:
I suppose this means that Al Roker doesn't exist either, or at the very least wasn't working on 9/11. After all in the video 'proving' nose out on the site I visited, I only inferred it was he because of his voice and general shape and mannerisms
Click to expand...

And nobody can prove that he's not a hologram.
 
dafydd said:
And nobody can prove that he's not a hologram.
Click to expand...

Or CGI.
I should add that, of course, all of the people he interacted with on the street, as is his won't on the show, were also unrecognizable. Apparently the "Today" show was entirely faked that day and once they cut to breaking news it didn't matter.
 
The poster in front of me, Jayhades suggested I was shown a crappy blurred video on which I base my comments. The only crappy blurred video I know of comes from media archives. I assume we talked the same video. He implied a better video was shown on 911, one
that would show the same events but in better quality. I asked for the link to see it for myself such wonder.
 
Mikeys said:
The poster in front of me, Jayhades suggested I was shown a crappy blurred video on which I base my comments. The only crappy blurred video I know of comes from media archives. I assume we talked the same video. He implied a better video was shown on 911, one
that would show the same events but in better quality. I asked for the link to see it for myself such wonder.
Click to expand...

Why not just admit that you have no full theory? Signed, a teetotaler.
 
I watched it ON 9/11 and was not recording. So I don't have a link.
How good the resolution ( in this case meaning pixels per true length of objects seen in the video) of any videos will depend on several factors. The type of recording media being used, the camera being used, the distance between camera and object, focal length of the lens.

That aside if we are to believe Mikey's then not only were the videos, live and recorded by all and sundry persons and recording media, all aircraft parts were surreptitiously placed around Manhattan, for not one, but two, aircraft. In addition, despite the fact that we have a tower burning and hundreds of people watching this, when the other tower then inexplicably had an explosion none of the dozens/hundreds who witnessed this managed to find their way to newspaper letters to the editor, radio talk shows, internet forums, to tell of the strangeness of being directly under the path of this supposed second plane yet they did not see it.

Tell you what Mikey's, its been over a decade. CGI has improved quite a bit over that time. Perhaps you can convince a cable network to set up cameras somewhere in a large city and send your hand picked team live video. You won't be told in advance where the cameras will be, nor what zoom or aperature settings will be of the camera. There will also be a few dozen people in the vicinity with various types of cameras. Your team's task is to insert a plane into the live feed then confiscate and alter all of these private videos.

Gee, its been over a decade and it hasn't occurred to any no-planer to demonstrate this! How come?
 
jaydeehess said:
No one on this side of the debate needs the NBC original footage to know that planes hit the building, and IF any no-planer truther organization has bothered to request it in the last decade , NBC probably doesn't want to deal with unbalanced people.
Click to expand...

The videos are for grabs or were from media archives, free to watch, decompressed. No foolies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom