On another matter.......
Sky News carried a short piece on the far-from-new news that Sollecito may have visited Meredith's grave several months ago. There's an accompanying text article on the Sky News website:
http://news.sky.com/story/1163726/meredith-kercher-murder-accused-visits-grave
What's most interesting to me, though, is the back end of the report and article. Given that this piece was filed by Nick Pisa, a reporter who covered the entirety of the trial process to date (including the current appeal), it's somewhat astonishing to find the following assertion from Pisa regarding the new tests on the knife (my highlighting):
Pisa appears therefore not to understand that only swab 36I was tested by the Carabinieri, and that it is only the results of their tests on this specific swab that revealed Knox's DNA but none of Meredith's or Sollecito's. In other words, he appears to be under the misconception that the Carabinieri re-tested the whole knife, and found no trace of Meredith's (or Sollecito's) DNA*.
To me, this speaks loudly to the very poor quality of "journalism" employed during this case. What's happened, in effect, is that the media (the press, in particular) seem to have left coverage of such a long drawn-out process to second-rate reporters and local stringers (big hello to Vogt and Nadeau!).
* Of course, it's true to say that C&V concluded that there was indeed none of Meredith's DNA on the knife as they were given it to re-test, and that Stefanoni's "finding" on Meredith's DNA on swab 36B was so riddled with malpractice and incompetence as to render it unreliable and inadmissible. But that's a completely different event than the one Pisa was "reporting" on: the C&V conclusions were news some 26 months ago.