Using sarcasm to avoid admitting you were wrong and to keep strawmanning your opponents' arguments isn't very productive. It's also rather transparent, especially when you're clearly trying to get the last word and change the subject.OK. You've all convinced me I was wrong. Death threats are just one more way of winning friends and influencing people, no different than any other method of persuasion. A credible death threat isn't going to permanently alter whatever relationship two people or group of people have with one another. I don't know what I was thinking.[...]
No one is asserting that being threatened with death will not change human relations. We're arguing that a carrot and stick approach has consistently proven itself to be more effective than just the stick alone. Moreover, you were arguing that death threats would have very specific reactions, not that it would just change the way people related to each other. You're trying to backpedal.